similar to: how to stop WfWG local browse master announcements?

Hi all! Here is my problem: I have installed RedHat Linux version 6.0 on a computer and I want to share its resources via samba. Unfortunately, my computer - which is running WfWg 3.11 for Eastern Europe and the trumpet winsock TCP/IP stack is not able to see the samba server. Other computers, running Win95, Linux and WfWg with M$ TCP/IP stack perform OK. I have tried the following combinations:

Has anybody got some experience with connecting machines running Windows3.1 or WfWG (3.11) to Samba? We would like to run a small lab network with user accounts and a shared printer off the samba box. Samba is running fine and there's no problem to connect to it from the Win95/WinNT machines... Any help appreciated. Frank Wornle, Glasgow Caledonian University Dept. of Engineering

Salam to all Thanks for reading this. I am using Samba 1.9.17p2 on Solaris2.5.1 running on Sun sparc-20 servers. Our print servers are running WfWg. We want to print from Unix to Wfwg servers. I have tested print command of smbclient on a printer attached with a NT box and it works fine. But I want to print not only from command line but also from

Dear users Thanks for reading this. Hope you will help me. I am using samba 1.9.17p2 on SunSparc-20 running solaris2.5.1 for printing and file sharing with PC-network. File sharing is working fine but I want to print to a WfWg printer from Solaris. So I have used your script smbprint.sysv and try to print. But I am facing following problems: 1-

I am using samba-1.9.18p10 in a Redhat 5.1 Linux box. I have a short question, i.e. Is it true that once the nmbd is running and becoming the Master Browser, others win95 clients will not act as Master Browser anymore ? Panyarak Ngamsritragul Department of Mechanical Engineering Prince of Songkla University.

Rudolf Kollien email: Rudolf.Kollien@medas.de Rudolf.Kollien@kollien.de *************************************************************************** Never trust a operating system you have no sources for *************************************************************************** Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 07:57:32PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: Hello Rowland. > I understand about CNC, nobody thinks about the builtin PC going > obsolete before the machine wears out, so you end up a machine that is > virtually obsolete. Exactly. > If it does, then creating a VM to run a Unix domain member in, would be > a good idea. I will do it, security is never

My server is RH 5.2 and i use Samba 1.9.18p10 and the client use WFW 3.11 with tcp/ip protocols installed. The subnet and the IP Address is right but I still only telnet form WFW 3.11 to Linux...not the reverse. On Linux telnet is working. I've checked it through this cmdline "telnet localhost 23 or telnet 127.0.0.1" . And I also testparm smb.conf and nothing wrong happen. FYI I set

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:04:29PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: Hello Rowland. > I had to read this several times to understand it, then a few more > because I didn't believe it. Well. In the industrial environment you may find everything ranging from CPM-86 onwards... old things talk via RS-232 or 422, the LAN equipped are regarded as "modern". In general all are

Hello. I need to let Windows for Workgroup 3.11 clients (industrial machinery) connect to shares in the PDC samba Version 4.2.14-Debian. I started to be able to connect to shares exported by domain members windows professional (7, 10) machines (share permissions include "domain users"), after I added "lanman auth = yes" to PDC and updated the user password, though it's

Well. A priori. I'm a dedicated legacy OS person. I cut my teeth on command line DOS and then WIN 3.xx (these days that means WFWG 3.11). I drew the line at WIN9x. Hate that beast with a true passion, but because it is the 800 pound gorilla, I have to find some way to accomodate it in the future. So, here is the rub. Linux is a real PITA. Capital PITA. Unbelievably techie and that is bad.

I have a network with two older systems protected by APC UPSs. Both systems run OS/2 and will continue to do so. Both systems have APC PowerChute Plus 4.2.3 installed and I can use that software to monitor and control both systems. I am also now running several linux systems, in fact I spend almost all my time on the linux systems and these OS/2 systems are servers running in the

I have a problem with 2.0.5 that did not happen in 2.0.4b or previous releases. I am seeing thousands of these messages in log.smb: [1999/07/20 23:44:24, 0] lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1095) ERROR: string overflow by 7 in string_sub(%M, 967) and the smbd process seems to be stuck in a tight loop. It's caused by the variable substitutions in these lines from smb.conf: root preexec = [ %U

At 12:25 AM 8/4/98 +1000, you wrote: > I setup the smbpasswd file as described in ENCRYPTION.txt (in >the Samba documentation), and, as we are _only_ 12 users wanting to >access the shares, gave everyone a simple initial samba password. Then I >asked the NT4 users to login to the samba server (Linux 2.x, Samba >1.9.18p8) as Unix users and change their samba password with the

I've been running samba servers with 200+ W98 machines for some time. I'm changing to W2k and everything was going fine. I've upgraded 40 boxes. One W2k box has started announcing itself as a local master browser for one of the workgroups. A samba server thinks it is master, forcing election. Samba will stop being the LMB for about 3 minutes and then will re-establish itself as

Hi, I have a network with a mix of Win95 and 98 machines (thus some use encrypted passwords by default and some don't. I already have all the users in a Unix password file therefore I'd like to use non encrypted passwords if I can and fall back on encrypted passwords if I don't have a choice (patched Win95 and Win98) because that requires people with encrypted password

Hi. Myself and a anti-Micro$oft companion tried to get NT domain logons working yesterday and seem pretty close, but not quite. Samba is 1.9.18alpha3, server is an Ultra-2 running SunOS 5.5.1. Encrypted passwords seem to be working, a la smbclient and mostly from NT, "mostly" because it *seemed* to be working but we did have some problems with home directories in smbpasswd changing

Hi, I'm thoroughly RTFM'ing in order to find out what I'm doing wrong <http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-October/thread.html#151046> and I noticed that links from the *Samba-HOWTO-Collection* to the *manpages-3* don't work... the problem is that both documentation sets are on different directories but links don't include a path (nor absolute, nor relative).

I noticed a few weeks ago that I was no longer able to access shares on a win98 box called cs198787-a. This used to work but it's now broken and I have no idea why???? I'm going nuts trying to fix this. I've even gone out and bought the book "Using Samba" .... great book btw. The samba server is running on a SuSE linux system and passes all the tests in the

My response is below. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:29 PM > To: Hawks, Steven L > Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA > Subject: Re: Can Samba be Installed on a Solaris 2.6 operating > system? > > "Hawks, Steven L" wrote: > > > > Can Samba be Installed on a