similar to: Access across routers

I am trying to connect to remote machines NT or SAMBA servers using TCP/IP (SMB) via Windows 95 and/or Windows NT. We are connecting to an oracle database that needs to be mounted consistently one particular way. I can succesfully issue the run command \\<fully qualified domain name> on the NT side and everything works great. However Windows 95 fails! On the other hand I can issue the

We are running Samba 1.9.16p11 on a Sun SPARC 10 and Windows NT 4.0 (SP2/SP3). We have a NT Server acting as the primary domain controller, domain master browser, distributed file system server, password server, and WINS server. Users' home directories and some software reside on the UNIX machines. I am currently running a linux box inside a corp which is running NTDOMAIN. I am trying to

With create mask = 0750 in smb.conf I got for directories: drwxr-xr-x 2 meyer urtmit 512 Sep 16 13:28 xxxx for files: -rwxr----- 1 meyer urtmit 6 Sep 16 13:28 XYX Why not rwxr for the dir? TIA, KD _/ _/ ___/ _____/ K. D. Meyer _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Universitaet Trier _/ Email: meyer@uni-trier.de _/ _/ _/___/_/ _/ Rechenzentrum

What would you call elements of the form: xyz:$abc -- variables seems to be the name in the tablegen code ??? They are not mentioned in the tablegen users guide but of course used heavily. xyx must be a def and exist? Thanks. Reed

Mehdi, I am perusing the 3.8 trunk sources, and don’t find evidence where I would expect it for LLVM “downgrading” a function’s calling convention. PrologEpilogEmitter() { “CodeGen/” ... TFI->determineCalleeSaves() { “Target/XYZ/” TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves() { “CodeGen/” Return <<< some object derived

Mehdi, I’m seeing lots of “upgrading” logic, If (UseIPRA) createPass(new DummyCGSCCPass); if (UseIPRA) addPass(createRegUsageInfoPropPass()); if (UseIPRA) addPass(createRegUsageInfoCollector()); ??? --Peter. From: mehdi.amini at

I posted this yesterday to r-help and Ben Bolker suggested reposting it here... Dickison, Daniel <ddickison <at> carnegielearning.com> writes: > > The documentation for agrep says it uses the Levenshtein edit distance, > but it seems to get this wrong in certain cases when there is a > combination of deletions and substitutions. For example: > > >

Doh. I missed the list in my first reply... Here's the replay of the conversation: ----- Renato: On 10 August 2015 at 14:05, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > --> %SP<def,tied1> = t2LDMIA_RET %SP<tied0>, pred:8, pred:%CPSR, > %R7<def>, %PC<def>, %SP<imp-use,undef>, %R7<imp-use,undef>, >

I don't think it is reasonable to change the parser this way. This is currently valid R code: a <- "foo" "bar" and with the new syntax, it is also valid, but with a different meaning. Or you can even consider a <- "foo" bar %>% func() %>% print() etc. I like the idea of string literals, but the C/C++ way clearly does not work. The Python/Julia way

Hello All, Touching up a file is supposed to switch on the Archive bit. However, I can only get this to happen if the client doing the editing is also the owner. This is fine for owner access in the HOME directories, but is useless when a file is modified by any member of a group. The impact is that my incremental backup only backs up a group rwx file when it is modified by the owner. This is a

Dear list, I am using rsync with Ubuntu: clients use 7.04 LTS (rsync ?version 2.6.9 ?protocol version 29) server has 9.04 (rsync ?version 3.0.5 ?protocol version 30) I am working with rsync and I notice 2 strange behaviors: the fist one is already described in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536078 , but I don't find any reply the second one, when parsing log file,

In the past few years we have been working on making it possible to use packages in both R and Spotfire S+ (previously officially called S-PLUS). One problem was that certain lines in the DESCRIPTION file of a package needed to be specific to R or Spotfire S+. E.g., if your package used the xyplot() function then the package would depend upon lattice in R and trellis in Spotfire S+, or a package

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > I don't think it is reasonable to change the parser this way. This is > currently valid R code: > > a <- "foo" > "bar" > > and with the new syntax, it is also valid, but with a different > meaning. Or you can even consider > > a <- "foo" > bar %>% func() %>% print() > >

Hello, The function ARMBaseInstrInfo::AnalyzeBranch contains the following piece of code: } else if (I->isReturn()) { // Returns can't be analyzed, but we should run cleanup. CantAnalyze = !isPredicated(I); } else { This could lead to cases where for a block that ends with a conditional return, AnalyzeBranch returns false (i.e. analyzed), both TBB and FBB are

Hi, I made an interesting observation using webservers (not just mongrel) under red hat enterprise linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 5). Maybe this is helpful or somebody with deeper networking expertise can comment on this. Once client said that 1-2% of the response of our server were unacceptably slow (really huge 3s-21s). So I did more ab and httperf tests and notice that very few

Hi, I have my RoR deployed on Linux server. My application has "browse file" section where it selects the file from users machine (e.g. - D:/kw/loaddata/New/abc.txt) and passes it to convertTo method But the path is not being resolved. It throws me an error: Errno::ENOENT (No such file or directory - D:/kw/loaddata/New/abc.txt): .//app/controllers/releases_controller.rb:35:in

Ok fellows, This is my last try. Please, anybody tell me if something is missing on this list! I need to setup on a Linux + Samba (PDC) to restrict just one login per ID (not allow two logins with same id).So: 1 - edit /etc/pam.d/samba -> chaging session line with session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so 2 - in /etc/security/limits.conf: * - maxlogins 1 3 - in smb.conf:

I'm in the process of installing OpenSSH-2.5.1p1 on a cluster of machines. One of the aspects of a previous (non-OpenSSH) version of ssh that I had been using was its ability to tolerate soft links to it. Thus, one could set up # ln -s /usr/bin/ssh /usr/local/bin/machine and thereafter type just 'machine' to connect to that host. This version of OpenSSH doesn't appear to

> On Jan 3, 2017, at 1:24 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: > > Only Mac clients are affected? Have you tested a Linux (e.g. Fedora 25 > live OS would do) client? > > It's necessary for all files to have selinux context > system_u:object_r:samba_share_t:s0. You can either user chcon -R to > apply it recursively to a particular directory

Hi all - should I be surprised to be receiving these notifications today when a newer version, 3.10.0-862.3.2, corresponding to https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1629 appears to already be available from CentOS ?yum update? Installing: kernel x86_64 3.10.0-862.3.2.el7 updates 46 M Noam