similar to: Samba not removing lock files?

I recently (a few weeks ago) installed 1.9.18p8 in order to get better performance with an Access Database, which along with adding a TCP_NODELAY in the [global] section has that working like a charm. Thing that's bugging me now is smbstatus. When I run it I see open files listed when I know that they aren't. The following output shows quite a few files open that aren't really. The

hello, can anybody explain or point me to a document that explain the locked files section produced by smbstatus -L (see below). what means denymode ? access ? what means exclusive+batch in the oplock section ? can anybody point me to a document explaining the way file locking works ? regards # smbstatus -L Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name

Dear all, I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12 On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them. After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well, We get on windows when we try to open the network drive

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: File Locking and Permissions Issue Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:10:28 -0700 From: Jack Lauman <jlauman@nwcascades.com> Organization: nwcascades.com To: mailto:samba@lists.samba.org I'm trying to get Lacerte 2007 Tax Accounting software working on a Samba v3.0.28a based server. When one user is logged in it works fine. When two or more users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Life is trying things to see if they work." Ray Bradbury ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a bug fix release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major bug fixes included in Samba 3.2.2 are: o

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "Life is trying things to see if they work." Ray Bradbury ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is a bug fix release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major bug fixes included in Samba 3.2.2 are: o

On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:34:29 +0200 Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, the users exist as both Linux and Samba users. My question was > if the Windows client user "Admin" also needs to be Linux and Samba > user. > There is no windows user called 'Admin', there is one called 'Administrator', if it is the later, then it

After having migrated my machines and user to Samba 4.3.11 on Ubuntu 16.04.1 (no domain upgrade, new provision, all accounts new defined) and old data copied over to the new machines, I have now a broader testbed and notice issues I didn't see prior to that. Having roaming profiles (defined in the user object in LDB)... Seemingly at random smbd keeps locks on NTUSER.DAT and ntuser.ini for a

As Andrew is a little busy right now I've made a Samba 2.0.6pre3 snapshot available at : Source code ----------- ftp.samba.org:/pub/samba/alpha/samba-2.0.6pre3.tar.gz RedHat 6.1 Intel RPM -------------------- ftp.samba.org:/pub/samba/alpha/samba-2.0.6pre3-19991102.i386.rpm RedHat 6.1 Source RPM --------------------- ftp.samba.org:/pub/samba/alpha/samba-2.0.6pre3-19991102.src.rpm Please

Using samba 3.05 and the point and print features how does one setup tcp/ip ports for printing. After having loaded the print drivers using the APW all the printer ports show a local port on the samba server and all of my printers use a 192.168.10.X address. Is there anyway this can automatically happen without user intervention. I wasn't able to locate this info in the how to's.

I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly sometimes. I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to be solved yet. The only

Hello, I have manually mounted the SYSVOL share, sync it with samba and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. But I'm not sure if all windows policies are acceptable by samba because of errors logs: 2015/03/18 09:30:52.197934, 0] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:338(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file myDomain.local/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Registry.pol --

Of course, the sysvol is located on a windows controller from the forest. mount -t cifs -o username=domain_admin_user //windowsDC.myDomain.local/SYSVOL /mnt/smb/sysvol and copied the files with -R --preserve to /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ Below logs are provided from /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd file. regards, On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at

Hi Jerry/Samba Team I have Samba 3.0.10 installed on Solaris8 server and Samba-client-2.2.10 installed on Linux Red Hat2.1AS servers The Linux servers use Samba to mount filesystems from Solaris8 server. My question is how to find out on the Solaris8 server which Linux servers are using Samba to mount from. Because it is hideous to go to every Linux server and see which Solaris8 server they are

Hello, Our samba fileserver is a member of a Windows 2008R2 domain, and has different shares. These shares are set with a "read only = yes" and have an explicit "write list". This works as planned. But when an "read only" user opens a pdf with Adobe acrobat, the file gets DenyMode DENY_WRITE and the user who can edit the file can't save the document anymore.

I noticed one of my smbd processes for one particular client (IUSR_JUNIPER) is taking 200MB in memory, far different from all the other smbd processes. Should I be concerned about a memory leak here? I don't think samba would be caching any files, so I can't see why it'd use this much memory. That windows client is a win2k IIS5 server, with well over 60 sites that are hosted off a

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:29:17PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >24.01.2023 20:22, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: >>What Samba version is this? This: >> >>>LEASE() >> >>... looks broken: the handle oplock/lease state claims to be a >>lease, which means the client didn't request an oplock but a lease >>which should not have happened in

Mandi! Kacper Wirski via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I understand the OP, I was asking some time ago similar question, but it was > in relation to samba domain member. Thanks, Kacper. > I couldn't get backend: ad to work for > machine accounts, so i switched to idmap: rid and it solved everything. I > tried manually adding UID and GID to Domain Computer group and to

Sorry, I have omitted to post the config file. # cat /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf [global] workgroup = myDomain realm = myDomain.local netbios name = DCLINUX server role = active directory domain controller dsdb:schema update allowed = yes [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/rcs-rds.local/scripts read only = No [sysvol]

Hi, I have an SMB server running RH6.2 with SMB 2.0.7. All the clients are WIN95, and require access to a database on the SAMBA server. The problem is that the database locks the file while the user is modifying it, and then unlocks it when the user returns to the programs menu. If the user then selects another action that uses the same file the program reports that the file is locked. Another