similar to: KerbNet!

I had given NIS access to the Windows NT domain users via Samba 1.9.18p3. The Samba gateway worked great when the users on the NT domain had the same username & password on both the NT PDC as well as the NIS. I have now set up Samba 1.9.18.p4 with server security & password sync turned on. The server specified is my NT PDC. Users get full access to the NIS & the NT with single logon

> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 07:03:49 -0800 > From: "Jorge Silva (Jorge Gomes da Silva)" <jorgesil@microsoft.com> > To: "'samba@samba.anu.edu.au'" <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> > Subject: /etc/passwd - Domain Controller Synchronization > Message-ID: <A1A4DA3CD56ECF11973200805F685F1680F51B@LIS-01-MSG> > > Hello, > > I don't know

SUBJECT: SAMBA digest 1700 ERROR: Text size exceeds maximum

I have a question on how to set up usernames under Linux/NT so that our new Samba setup works properly. This is how our new system is going to work: DOMAIN "OB-GYN" "Alfred" -- Windows NT PDC (NT Server 4.0) User Profiles stored on this machine Since it's a PDC, it processes login requests Also WINS server

I have samba running on RH 8, samba 2.2.7-2, and using winbind.. Want "homes" share to automatically display as users access it. Thought I could use the %u but am having no luck.. Currently, have it set up but when user clicks on home share a username/password dialog displays and will not accept valid credentials for that user? Have my config and log snips from nmbd and machine

My smb.conf looks like so. [global] security = ads realm = MIND.UNM.EDU workgroup = MIND idmap config * : backend = tdb idmap config * : range = 2000-7999 idmap config MIND:backend = ad idmap config MIND:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config MIND:range = 8000-9999999 idmap config MIND:unix_nss_info = yes winbind use default domain = yes restrict anonymous = 2 I have

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu> wrote: > Hi Karthik > > Looking at the information you have provided me, I would like to make sure > that I?m running the right commands. > > 1. gluster volume heal scratch info > If the count is non zero, trigger the heal and wait for heal info count to become zero. > 2. gluster volume

Hello We are trying to setup Gluster for our project/scratch storage HPC machine using a replicated mode with 2 nodes, 2 bricks each (14tb each). Our goal is to be able to have a replicated system between node 1 and 2 (A bricks) and add an additional 2 bricks (B bricks) from the 2 nodes. so we can have a total of 28tb replicated mode. Node 1 [ (Brick A) (Brick B) ] Node 2 [ (Brick A) (Brick

pls could you include my name in the samba Digest mailing list, thanks Mark.

Hi All, Greetings from the Gentoo Linux developers :) We are using isolinux 2.0 for our LiveCD and have found a small cosmetic bug. It appears that on some systems, our adorable boot graphic (see http://cvs.gentoo.org/~drobbins/livecd.png) does not display properly. Instead, we get a standard white-on-blue text display -- our text displays fine, our F2 help menu works fine, etc. -- but no

Hi, Please let us know what commands you ran so far and the output of the *gluster volume info* command. Thanks, Nithya On 9 January 2018 at 23:06, Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu> wrote: > Hello > > We are trying to setup Gluster for our project/scratch storage HPC machine > using a replicated mode with 2 nodes, 2 bricks each (14tb each). > > Our goal is to be

Hello Karthik Im having trouble adding the two bricks back online. Any help is appreciated thanks when i try to add-brick command this is what i get [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume add-brick scratch gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch/ volume add-brick: failed: Pre Validation failed on gluster02ib. Brick: gluster02ib:/gdata/brick2/scratch not available. Brick may be containing or be

Hi Nithya This is what i have so far, I have peer both cluster nodes together as replica, from node 1A and 1B , now when i tried to add it , i get the error that it is already part of a volume. when i run the cluster volume info , i see that has switch to distributed-replica. Thanks Jose [root at gluster01 ~]# gluster volume status Status of volume: scratch Gluster process

I found what I needed to do DOMAIN=MIND.UNM.EDU SHORT=MIND authconfig --enablekrb5 --krb5kdc=${DOMAIN} --krb5adminserver=${DOMAIN} --krb5realm=${DOMAIN} --enablewinbind --enablewinbindauth --smbsecurity=ads --smbrealm=${DOMAIN} --smbservers=${DOMAIN} --smbworkgroup=${SHORT} --winbindtemplatehomedir=/na/homes/%U --winbindtemplateshell=/bin/bash --enablemkhomedir --enablewinbindusedefaultdomain

My smb.conf file now looks like so [global] #--authconfig--start-line-- # Generated by authconfig on 2017/10/30 10:47:34 # DO NOT EDIT THIS SECTION (delimited by --start-line--/--end-line--) # Any modification may be deleted or altered by authconfig in future workgroup = MIND password server = MIND.UNM.EDU realm = MIND.UNM.EDU security = ads idmap config * : range = 2000-7999

Hi All We were able to get all 4 bricks are distributed , we can see the right amount of space. but we have been rebalancing since 4 days ago for 16Tb. and still only 8tb. is there a way to speed up. there is also data we can remove from it to speed it up, but what is the best procedures removing data , is it from the Gluster main export point or going on each brick and remove it . We would like

Looking at the logs , it seems that it is trying to add using the same port was assigned for gluster01ib: Any Ideas?? Jose [2018-04-25 22:08:55.169302] I [MSGID: 106482] [glusterd-brick-ops.c:447:__glusterd_handle_add_brick] 0-management: Received add brick req [2018-04-25 22:08:55.186037] I [run.c:191:runner_log] (-->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.8.15/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so(+0x33045)

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 at 21:16, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jose Sanchez <josesanc at carc.unm.edu> > Date: 11 January 2018 at 22:05 > Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Creating cluster replica on 2 nodes 2 bricks > each. > To: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> > Cc: gluster-users

Hi Jose, Gluster is working as expected. The Distribute-replicated type just means that there are now 2 replica sets and files will be distributed across them. A volume of type Replicate (1xn where n is the number of bricks in the replica set) indicates there is no distribution (all files on the volume will be present on all the bricks in the volume). A volume of type Distributed-Replicate

Hi, Removing data to speed up from rebalance is not something that is recommended. Rebalance can be stopped but if started again it will start from the beginning (will have to check and skip the files already moved). Rebalance will take a while, better to let it run. It doesn't have any down side. Unless you touch the backend the data on gluster volume will be available for usage in spite of