similar to: A suggestion about this List

Hello We are running samba on SGI/SUN/HP fileservers. We saw a problem on the SGI fileservers. After a while a lot of defunct smbd deamons were hanging and occupying the slots in the process table. We saw the problem with IRIX 5.2 and samba 1.9.16p11 and IRIX 6.2 and samba 1.9.17.p4 . Has anybody seen this problem before? This is a serious problem, because the smbd daemons are filling the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675 luke-jr+sambabugs@utopios.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luke- | |jr+sambabugs@utopios.org ------- Comment #2 from

On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Dieter Rothacker wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > > > > Here is the smb.conf of the disappeared samba box: > > ^^^^^^^^^^^ > I do not think THIS computer should become local master !? > (see below) > > > > wins support = no > > > workgroup = WORKGROUP > > >

On Sat, 14 Mar 1998 14:40:28 +1100, someone wrote: > >I was wondering if anyone else has seen the problem that I'm seeing with > >the latest version of Samba (1.9.18p3) under Solaris 2.6. I'm using it in > >part to backup about 15 PC clients (all but two are running NT 4) with > >the Amanda backup program. Anyway, the problem is that on occasion > >when

Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@coe.ufrj.br> wrote: > I think it would be useful if samba had a utmp log interface. > I know that it's possible to see who is logged with smbstatus, but > sometimes a simple who(1) or w(1) is more efficient and ubiquitous. If you were to search for 'wtmp' in the 1997 archives (via the Samba web pages), you would find one interesting

Howdy folks: Please (I beg you, please!) don't follow the examples of a couple of recent posters. This is very bad form. If you want to get off the list, please don't send send a message to the list begging other readers to help (they can't). Only you can help stamp out forest fires (or get yourself off this list). At the top of every message from the list is a URL that can

Hello root@inet.hkg.com, It looks like someone, at your end, is leaking SPAM into the Samba list. The apparent source of this SPAM is <inet.hkg.com> which, unbelieveably, is a real address. They are then relay-raping the Singapore Network to get it into this list. After careful deliberation, I have conciously decided to forward this one message into the samba lists. All future SPAM

NOT WANTED On Sun, 30 Nov 1997 samba@samba.anu.edu.au wrote: > SAMBA Digest 1508 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) How do I use multiple NT password servers > by jurgessj@b1b.ok.boeing.com (John E. Jurgess ) > 2) Re: How do I use multiple NT password servers > by Luke

We still have quite a few patches pending in samba-bugs. If you have sent a patch to samba-bugs and are waiting for it to be integrated then you might like to know about two things that make life easier for you and for us. The first is the samba-cvs list. This is a standard listproc list (just like this one) that automatically receives all the cvs commit messages. Be warned that this list is

Try using the "force create mode" parameter. Regards, Tim > Tim Boorman > UNIX Systems Support > Lusis Limited, Technology Drive, Bridgend Science Park, Bridgend, > United Kingdom CF31 3UJ > Extension: 44966 > Direct Line: +44 (0)1656 765966 > Mobile: +44 (0)468 647495 > Email: boorman.tim@lusis.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2403 Summary: ssh port setting Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: sambabugs@kilimajer.net QAContact:

We have noticed a change in the way AD authentication behaves starting with 3.0.25. Ive been hoping it was a bug and someone would notice and fix it. But since its still there as of 3.0.28, I guess its a feature :-). Anyway, our users on XP machines used to be able to authenticate against AD with just a username/password eg u1234567. But as of 3.0.25 they need to use a fully qualified username eg

---------- > > SAMBA Digest 1376 > > For information on unsubscribing and on what is appropriate to post to > this list see ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/lists/samba.txt > > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: Print Share Name Length > by Fred Pishotta <Pishotta.Fred@Mayo.Edu> > 2) Re: MS-Access problems with samba-1.9.16p9 > by

The Samba Team have just released a new alpha version of Samba - 1.9.17alpha5. It is our hope that this will be the last version of the 1.9.17 alpha series before the full 1.9.17 release. The new release is available from the URL: ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/samba/alpha/samba-1.9.17alpha5.tar.gz and is in the form of a gzip'ed tar file. Here is the WHATSNEW.txt from the release. Regards,

samba@samba.org Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> "Deborah Barba" <dbarba@yahoo-inc.com> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> "Michael Martin" <michael@violetstar.com> Michael Gerdts <gerdts@cae.wisc.edu> Sachin Patil (C&A_Projects) <cna-sp@asc.ltindia.com> Luke Kenneth Casson

Hi, I am getting unexpected behaviour from aggregate.ts(). The 'ndeltat' argument is effectively being reduced by 1 in some cases, even when it is an integer, with the result that the blocks to be aggregated are not of the expected size, and also that the end() of the aggregated series is much later than the end() of the original series. rawts <- ts(rep(1:10, each = 5), start = 1) ##

I always get the messages of this list in a digest format. This is bad to handle, esp. if you want to answer a question found in the digest. Does everyone else also get the list as a digest? Is there a way to switch to single messages? If not how do I easily answer messages which the subject correctly set? Or how do I automatically split the digest into the separate messages? For your

Please, remove my registration from your mailing-list. For weeks I tried everything I could, but without any response!! I followed all hints found under http://samba.anu.edu.au/listproc Sincerely Bernhard Himmel himmel@warnow.e-technik1.uni-rostock.de himmel@saphir.physik1.uni-rostock.de himmel@physik1.uni-rostock.de > Reply-to: samba@samba.org > From:

Pam_SMB allows Linux clients to validate their passwords against an NT PDC, so the only thing you have to do is set up the accounts on the Linux side with an '*' in the /etc/passwd entry. This can be done using a list of users: #!/bin/bash for i in `cat myuserlist`; do /usr/sbin/adduser -p '*' $i with various other command line options, such as "-s

I have tried in vain to address the Samba List Processor, and get these 'Samba Digest' messages stopped. I followed your procedure exactly, several times, to NO avail. Please contact your systems admin for me and have them STOP THIS DIGEST EMAIL. Also let them know the supposed 'automated' procedure for stopping it does not work. Thanks Systems Administrator Christian Medical