similar to: Security concerns

Hi, I want to connect to Samba volumes on a SCO Open Server 5 over the Internet from my NT 4 workstation. My workstation is in a local domain and gets a dynamic IP address when it connects to my ISP; the Internet hostname is also dynamic and can't be predicted. I can determine my ISP's B class subnet which I have put into the smb.conf file in the 'hosts allow' entry. However,

Having some strange difficulties with samba... it compiled fine and seems to be running ok but none of my win95 client machines can see the samba server. They can't even see the samba server when the server is configured as a WINS server and the client is configured to look at the server as its WINS server. anyways, my clients all have the following... microsoft network client IPX protocol

Thank you. So, If I understand correctly, "ordinary" "wide links = yes", means Samba *will* traverse an existing symlink that points outside the root of the share, if permissions allow. However because it *also* disables SMB1 Unix extensions, it *also* prevents the user from creating or modifying symlinks on the share, so in wffect it inherently prevents this being

Hi Jeff and Morten, I was just wondering if below wisdom is true, why not prefix every solution and project file with VC71 in front of the file name to signal the case that it is only designed for that specific IDE/tool? This gives us room for comming up with other solution and project files for another MS specific IDE/tool independt of each other. Henrik. ----Original Message Follows----

Hello All, I''m enjoying the simplicity and power of RJS templates in Rails 1.1, but am perplexed about sharing them. I have several templates that I would like to access in various controllers, but if I moved them to views/shared/whatever.rjs, my app can''t seem to find them. I changed the name to _whatever.rjs and referenced them as "shared/whatever", but no luck.

Is there some standard way to test migrations? It seems to me that an additional safeguard for migrations would be to test and see if applying the migrations to the test database allows one to reconstruct the structure of the development database. If you can''t, then there is an error in your migrations, most likely because someone hand-modified the database without generating a

----Original Message Follows---- From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No suchfileor directory Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:05:39 -0800 >Yes, it

----Original Message Follows---- From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No suchfile or directory Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:29:47 -0800

I successfully build llvm from cvs using vs2005 and stlport. I also had a couple of issues, but most were due to outdated project files. I also had to implement code for the alloca instruction. On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > The recent issues concern the head revision, post 1.9. As no one has > ever submitted patches to fix 2005 problems with the 1.9

It's a possibility, though it would be better to create whole separate trees for different versions of VS. It's not just the project and solutions that need to be kept separate; the object files themselves cannot be mixed between different versions of VS. There's no rush though. Trust me, C/C++ programmers will not rush to adopt Whidbey once it's released. You'd be

Hello I''m a newbie here so please don''t laugh at me... I plan to setup several (4) physical servers to run xen virtualized OS-es (in example web servers). What I need is that those virtualized OS-es must have simultaneous access to disk storage physically created on FC array. I read that this could be done by OCFS or Lustre file system but my question is: how virtualized

Hi, I have been trying to set up Apache2, Postfix, Dovecot, openLDAP and squirrelmail on my Ubuntu Server 10.04 machine. The idea is to make use of the LDAP to authenticate users to login to squirrelmail to send/receive emails. I have been using the link - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Postfix/DovecotLDAP, as a guide to get it all set up. I have checked the status for postfix and dovecot,

http://www.sdmagazine.com/jolts/2006index.html BOOKS TECHNICAL Jolt Winner: Agile Web Development with Rails by Dave Thomas, David Hansson, Leon Breedt and Mike Clark (Pragmatic Bookshelf) Productivity Winners: ? Framework Design Guidelines: Conventions, Idioms, and Patterns for Reusable .NET Libraries by Krzysztof Cwalina and Brad Abrams (Addison-Wesley) ? Practical Common Lisp by Peter

Henrik Bach wrote: > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > Reply-To: jeffc at jolt-lang.org, LLVM Developers Mailing List > <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VC++: Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': > No suchfileor

On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. I'm using the basic stuff (just libraries, 1.9) with 2005, although we had to fix a few

Hi, We needed a vorbis decoder that operated differently from the approach taken libvorbisfile. So I sat down, looked through the docs, and the sample decoder that come with libvorbis and wrote our own. Since I couldn't find any docs for the API for libvorbis itself, I've written some. It details all the steps you need to go through to write a _basic_ reusable decoder library using

The llvm-gcc source can be download from: http://jolt-lang.org/llvm-gcc.tar.bz2 31mb ~7 minute download http://jolt-lang.org/llvm-gcc.tar.gz 40mb ~8.5 minute download Download times assume you are the only person downloading. Please download the bz2 version if possible. I currently have no unexpected failures. Bill wrote: > On 5/4/07, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at

Yes, it should find windows.h with the default configuration. But you have to be suspicious of beta code that Microsoft gives out for free. It might just be very buggy, or it might be deliberately crippled. Considering the price tag on Visual Studio, it's one or the other (and probably both). Out of curiosity, did it accept the solution and project files as is, or did it want to

I agree completely with you, Jeff. However, I think it somehow would be nice, if you guys could tell comming users that the win32 solution is geared toward VC++ 7.1 (and hence use of other tools are at their own risk). And, I think it also would be really cool, if you guys come up with a solution how to handle multiple VC++ x solutions/projects from the same source, possibly ranging from VC

Thanks - that much I (pretty much) got. Its really the "wide links" option that isn't well distinguished/clarified. *insecure* wide links is much more clear, although the detail you've given helps a lot. What exactly is the "ordinary" "wide links = yes" option going to do (with or without Unix extensions), and how does it compare/how much exposure to