similar to: SAMBA digest 1365 and SPAM

Hello root@inet.hkg.com, It looks like someone, at your end, is leaking SPAM into the Samba list. The apparent source of this SPAM is <inet.hkg.com> which, unbelieveably, is a real address. They are then relay-raping the Singapore Network to get it into this list. After careful deliberation, I have conciously decided to forward this one message into the samba lists. All future SPAM

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// This Message was Composed using Extractor Pro Bulk E- Mail Software. If you wish to be removed from this advertiser's future mailings, please reply with the subject "Remove" and this software will automatically block you from their future mailings.

Hello all, Some may find this redundant, but this addresses a lot of qustions that I've been seeing, in the last few months, that were not dealt with, in the whole. In this message, I am addressing only capabilities, not specific HOW-TOs. It's more of a WHAT-IT-CAN-DO with a hint of WHY-YOU-WOULD-WANT-TO. In the near view, treat this as a features test report. SUMMARY: The questions were

Hello all, I have a recently discovered problem. It's creating a crisis. Most of my local GL is in Quicken. The Quicken data directory i on a Samba share on one of my Linux boxen. I am running p11. I use "force user" and "force group" to make sure that any entries are made under the same permissions and uuid. The "ledger" directory is shared out to two

> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 12:52:21 -0700 > From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> > To: eknuds@extremenetworks.com > Cc: "samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au" <samba@arvidsjaur.anu.edu.au> > Subject: Re: Linux smbfs 2.0.29... > Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970813125221.009e0a70@pop.mhsc.com> > > At 04:45 AM 8/14/97 +0000, you wrote: > >I

---------- > > SAMBA Digest 1376 > > For information on unsubscribing and on what is appropriate to post to > this list see ftp://samba.anu.edu.au/pub/lists/samba.txt > > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: Print Share Name Length > by Fred Pishotta <Pishotta.Fred@Mayo.Edu> > 2) Re: MS-Access problems with samba-1.9.16p9 > by

Pishotta.Fred@Mayo.Edu wrote: > > Yes, I got those too, on an identical platform, but with p6. Things seem > to work, but it would be comforting to know if this is a non-issue. > > -- Fred P. > > On Wed, 13 May 1998, SI-Gaetan Boudreau wrote: > > > I get these messages when compiling on a Sun Sparc 5 running Solaris 2.6: > > > > Compiling ipc.c >

12-06-98 7.30pm. Hi Fred Pishotta, Thanks for giving response to my mail.I'am unable to connect to the site you have given me to visit.Netscape browser is giving message "no entry in DNS server,type the correct URL".I will be grateful for helping me.My E-Mail address: reddyravinder@hotmail.com. Regards, Ravinder.

12-06-98 8.30pm. Hi Fred Pishotta, I received your mail. This time also i'am unable to get in to the site as netscape is giving same message as previous.I think i'am testing your patence,forgive. Tell some other sites from where i can download and the image servers to avoid such message.Thanks for repling me. Waiting for for

please take us off of the samba e-mail list for the time being thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: <samba@samba.org> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA <samba@samba.org> Sent: Monday, October 25, 1999 5:44 AM Subject: SAMBA digest 2283 > SAMBA Digest 2283 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue

Hello: I wonder if I could get a little help with random sampling in R. I have a vector of length 7375. I would like to draw 3 distinct random samples, each of length 100 without replacement. I have tried the following: d1 <- 1:7375 set.seed(7) i <- sample(d1, 100, replace=F) s1 <- sort(d1[i]) s1 d2 <- d1[-i] set.seed(77) j <- sample(d2, 100, replace=F) s2 <- sort(d2[j])

On a PMac 7200 (running LinuxPPC 3Q 99), trying to install "R-ctest-0.9.R16-1.ppc.rpm" and "R-splines-2.0.R3-3.ppc.rpm" rpms currently in the linuxppc binary download directory results in error messages saying that files in these rpms conflict with files from R-base 1.01-1. Of course, "R-rpart" and "R-survival4" then also can't be installed because the

Hello! I read your notice about your problem with Windows NT and servicepack 3. Did you find any solution? I have the same problem: I can?t see other computers on the network when I?m running SAMBA. I would appreciate if you could help me. Leif Magnusson

Unbelievable! These guys get more and more disgusting each day. But now I have a proof that Linux and all its free software community (samba included) are indeed growing and are indeed consideder a threat by M$. Expect more and dirtier moves. Can you guys point me to more material on the subject? []'s, Juan > From: "Le Quellec, Francis" <FLeQuell@Teknor.com> > >

I am using samba-1.9.16p11 and have not been able to make browsing work from my 9.04 HP where it is on a switched ethernet segement alone. I have tried many combinations including remote announce to networks as well as Our NT Domain Server/ Win Servers. All to no avail. I am sure there is some key point I am missing. In fact my clients have to have DNS turned on in addition to WINS in order to

Hi folks, I have a curious problem when executing self extracting zip files from a samba share. Everything does work, but it is very very slow. Copying the .exe onto local disk (from the samba share) takes no time at all (500kb/sec). I would say it takes about 10 times as long to unzip when run directly from the samba share. This happens will all self-extracting exe files, and also from any share

I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I

Dear CentOS Community Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need to stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today, my maillog look like : 4624 at myserver.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=myserver.com [127.0.0.1] Jun 14 19:07:01 at6412 sendmail[24627]: q5EN71jC024627: from=<>, size=3958, class=0, nrcpts=1,

hi out there, first of all: samba is pretty cool! question: is there a way to synchronize the clock of my linux box to a win95 box (something like 'smbnet time \\win95 /set /yes')? cheers jodok ;----------------------------------- Jodok Sutterluety Austria, Vienna Tel: ++43 1 4080791 email: js@bonus.unterland.at ;-----------------------------------

Hello, I have red the E-mail from Christophe Dumont from 17 Mar 1997We have a similar problem. In our smb.conf we have the entries: [global] hosts allow = 193.174.234., 192.124.248., 193.174.235., 141.35.191.122 workgroup = IMBNET printing = SYSV printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/yppasswd share modes = yes browseable = yes ....