similar to: [Bug 8411] New: invalid flist flag when using protocol 28 or 29

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[Bug 8411] New: invalid flist flag when using protocol 28 or 29"

1998 Jul 16
0
Samba services to NT client (PR#8411)
james.strauch@beasys.com wrote : > The problem is with the share "beasw". (see config below) This share > contains executable installs for various standard PC desktop software. The > share works fine and is viewable and writable by both Windows95 clients and > Windows-NT 4.0 clients. But when trying to install the applications (such > as Meeting Maker, 2nd Copy 97,
2003 Sep 15
0
rsync error: errors selecting input/output files, dirs (code 3) at flist.c(980)
Hi, I've got another error that is not in the FAQ ;) Ran from a script in a directory that doesn't exist anymore: shell-init: could not get current directory: getcwd: cannot access parent directories: No such file or directory building file list ... pop_dir /mnt/dar : No such file or directory rsync error: errors selecting input/output files, dirs (code 3) at flist.c(980) I guess
2003 May 17
1
flist transmission and sorting
Wayne, I've been ruminating a bit on the qsorted flist and duplicate removal and have an idea. What if we removed end_file_entry() from send_file_name() and instead had a for(i=0; i < flist->count; ++i) send_file_entry(flist->files[i], f, ??) in send_file_list(). As near as i can tell this would be unnoticeable to the protocol. Once done the sort of the file list could be
2007 Oct 18
1
3.0.0pre2(cvs) error: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed.
Just a quick heads up to say I'm still getting this (reproducable) error while doing daily backups: rsync: generator.c:1872: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed. rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1500) [receiver=3.0.0pre2] This is with cvs
2008 Mar 22
2
How does flist work
Hello Everyone, I have been reading the rsync code for the past few days and Iam finding it hard to understand how the file list works. The info that I am looking for is - "Are the files processed in the same order in both the receiver and generator processes?". Thanx in advance for all the replies. zahed. -- View this message in context:
2011 Apr 01
3
[Bug 8053] New: Older C compilers don't allow in-line declarations flist.c:1653
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8053 Summary: Older C compilers don't allow in-line declarations flist.c:1653 Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2004 Apr 22
1
rsync problems from flist.c change
On behalf of the development team of R (www.R-project.org), I would like to report the following problem with recent versions of rsync. First, some background info. The R Development Core Team uses CVS for maintainins its source code archive. Additionally, there is a mechanism for "mirroring" some important (so-called recommended) extension packages from a CRAN (Comprehensive R
2005 May 04
1
lmer error:flist must be a non-empty list
Hi, I was wondering if anyone could give me advice regarding using the lmer command in lme4 package to do logistic regression (mixed effects model). I use the following command lmer(ISH ~ArrayPathology2, random=~1|PatientID, data=HSDB4.noNA, family="binomial") where ISH is outcome(0 or 1), ArrayPathology2 is the variable of interest(factor), PatientID is random effect(factor), and
2008 Apr 22
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5407] New: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5407 Summary: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2001 Nov 17
2
transfer interrupted (code 3) at flist.c(812)
Ok, I just setup the log file and this is what I see there: rsync on cdrive/Temp/pix.log from admx (141.214.137.139) transfer interrupted (code 3) at flist.c(812) I had to change [cdrive] from path = "c:\" to path = c: to get rid of '@ERROR: chdir failed' error. I am getting close but still need some help. Thanks in advance. Nishi > -----Original Message----- From:
2004 Feb 06
4
memory reduction
As those of you who watch CVS will be aware Wayne has been making progress in reducing memory requirements of rsync. Much of what he has done has been the product of discussions between he and myself that started a month ago with John Van Essen. Most recently Wayne has changed how the file_struct and its associated data are allocated, eliminating the string areas. Most of these changes have been
2018 Dec 10
2
unable to add pci network to existing vm
Greetings, I'm trying to add a virtual nic to an existing and active vm and I'm getting this error: error: internal error: No more available PCI slots the cmd I'm trying to run is: virsh -c qemu:///system attach-interface --domain router --type bridge --source virbr0 --model virtio --config --live the lspci output within the vm is this: # lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation
2020 Mar 29
3
Upgrade to CentOS8
Hi Phil Here it is: [root at totorbex ~]# lspci -nn .00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register [8086:2280] (rev 21) 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:22b1] (rev 21) 00:10.0 SD Host controller
2007 Feb 05
3
Soul Reaver 2 v1.01 sound buffer underrun
Hello list, I am experiencing sound problems with Soul Reaver 2, follows the initial log after starting the game. $wine sr2.exe fixme:system:SystemParametersInfoW Unimplemented action: 59 (SPI_SETSTICKYKEYS) fixme:d3d:IWineD3DDeviceImpl_GetAvailableTextureMem (0x17a890) : stub, simulating 64MB for now, returning 64MB left fixme:d3d:IWineD3DDeviceImpl_ValidateDevice (0x17a890) : stub loading
2019 Feb 16
2
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
On 16/02/2019 02:43, Saurabh Nanda via samba wrote: >>> 2) Is this normal -- fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: Calculated size 157 length 156 >>> mismatch mid 11907 >> Could be a bug or miscalculated length + non critical warning, I also >> see this on master kernel. Either way I doubt it's slowing everything down. >> > Should I file a bug for this? > > >>
2009 Oct 15
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6816] New: Delta-transfer algorithm does not reuse already transmitted identical blocks
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6816 Summary: Delta-transfer algorithm does not reuse already transmitted identical blocks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned
2020 Mar 29
3
Upgrade to CentOS8
Hi Leon, I don't have the infra (nor the knowledge or expertise) to create a LiveCD I didn't think about Fedora. This is indeed a good pointer, I will definitely try that Actually, I'm not too worried about the basics, but rather about the wifi, audio & video drivers (one of the boxes is a multimedia system) Thanks!
2010 Dec 09
0
[LLVMdev] Parallel testsuite run breaks
greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes: > For now, I think if I tweak the way I do the build to always build > without pointing to llvm-gcc first, build and test LLVM then build > llvm-gcc and re-build LLVM, it should work. It will take much longer, > though. :( I updated the bug explaining what I'm seeing. I think the correct fix is to use absolute paths to tools
2010 Jan 06
1
Zaptel compilation problems: Data Mode!!
Hi all, I need Help. I want to compile zaptel in data mode but i got this errors: /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.12.1/kernel/zaptel-base.c: In function ?zt_xmit?: /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.12.1/kernel/zaptel-base.c:1618: error: implicit declaration of function ?hdlc_stats? /usr/src/zaptel-1.4.12.1/kernel/zaptel-base.c:1618: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast
2010 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] Parallel testsuite run breaks
Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> writes: >>> There is definitely something to this.  If I take a random failing >>> testcase and run the test in isolation in the shell, it works.  So >>> what, if anything, does lit/FileCheck/etc. do that might run >>> interference if there is another copy of lit/FileCheck/etc. running >>> at the same time? I