similar to: [Bug 8333] New: crash with hfs-compression.diff and possible fix

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8284 Summary: hfs-compression.diff patch incorrectly expands relative directory Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8267 Summary: hfs-compression.diff compile fix Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au

Precisions: If I run my patched rsync on 10.4 instead of 10.3, it's my function that returns an error: rsync: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr("Src/60-bsd-flags/dir-with- flags","com.apple.FinderInfo") failed: Unknown error: -5000 (-5000) And error -5000 means: afpAccessDenied -5000 User does not have the correct access to the file Directory cannot be shared Available in Mac OS

Working with rsync 3.0.2, it appears that rsync isn't unlocking files before setting the file attributes when those files already exist. This generates error messages on subsequent such as: rsync: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr("locked_file","test_xattr") failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: rsync_xal_clear:

Hello first, sorry for my bad english but i'm french I'm using totaly Ubuntu Dapper for 4 months, and Wine 0.9.9 I would like to submit you a very usefull software for windows and who doesn't work with Wine : it's Http File Server ( or HFS for close friends :D ) The HFS developer knows that HFS doesn't work with Wine, but doesn't know why, so we need your help :D A

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5565 Summary: xattrs not set on locked files that already exist on target Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi A friend has a disk with an hfs filesystem on it; we'd like to move it to a Debian (etch 2.6.18-6) box and share it via samba 3.0.24. I can mount the hfs disk and see the files on the linux box : good I can share a normal (xfs/etx3) fs via samba to the Mac : good Although I can share the hfs fs via samba, the extended attributes are not visible; so the existing files on the hfs

OS X 10.4.6 (BSD) I was using the 'standard' versions (i.e. non-HFS supporting) of rsync with the backup -b option so that I could do nightly incrementals. This seemed to be running fine. Changes to existing backed up files got copied to the appropriate path(s) on the target. BUDIR=myDirectoryName time /usr/local/bin/rsync -a -b --suffix=# --backup-dir=$BUDIR / Users

Hi guys, I'm running into a problem that I'm sure which part of the process fails. I use wget (OSX Leopard, wget 3.0.6 compiled from source) to backup my ~/Pictures directory to a linux server, also with wget 3.0.6 (Debian). In persuit of being sure I get everything from HFS filesystem (resource fork/metadata), I'm getting the following error: rsync: rsync_xal_set:

What is the order that rsync uses to set permissions? Time Machine directories have ACL permissions that basically prohibit making any changes of any kind. In order to make a backup of the directory, you would need to set those permissions after copying everything in the subdirectories. Is rsync smart enough to do it in that order? On 2018-03-19, at 10:44 PM, Andre Althoff via rsync <rsync

I am trying to transfer files between two OSX machines using a FAT32 formatted flash drive. I am transferring a "big" directory (7G). Basically I want to sync everyday my home and work computers for some directories. I tried many possible rsyncs (original supplied, fink 3.0.5/3.0.4 macports 3.0.5, rsync-2.6.3+hfsmode-1.2b2, 3.0.6+fileflags+crtimes) What I would really like to happen

Hi, Which version of Mac OS X are you running? If you are on Mac OS 10.5.x then I can only suggest that you try either formating the drive to HFS + or creating a disk image with an HFS+ file system. If you are running Mac OS 10.4.x then ensure that that ACL support is enabled on the drive. The following URL contains information on how to check and enable ACL support :

Hi all, I?ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all fine. but since i?m going to use this for serving mac home folders via netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes and acl?s. so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount. checking the

I ran into a problem that I couldn't resolve straight away, but would like to solve for sometime in the future. We have a Thecus storage server (similar to a Buffalo TeraByte, if that helps?) that has a Mac filesystem on it. The mother board was failing, but the drives are still OK. A new box has been added, so the urgency is sort of gone. I was going to try and back up the data to a new

That doesn’t work too. :-( Last login: Mon Mar 19 19:18:16 on console iMac:~ andre$ mount /dev/disk0s2 on / (hfs, local, journaled) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse) map -hosts on /net (autofs, nosuid, automounted, nobrowse) map auto_home on /home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse) /dev/disk2 on /Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3 (hfs, local, nodev, nosuid, journaled, noowners) iMac:~ andre$

Hello all, I've started a MacOS 10.3 Panther xattr project at the begin of the year. There is already some time that I haven't presented a new version of rsync10.3xattr_support patch. By this mail I would like to present my apologies and officially stop this project for many reasons: - I'm in a new job and don't need anymore to provide backup solutions for 10.3 users; - I

I am running a CentOS 3 server with a kernel version -2.4.21-40. I typically use Webmin to accomplish mounting varied filesystems, but this one has me buffaloed. We have a Thecus N5400 that was mounted on a Mac and a ton of data was written to it. All of the data was placed in yearly folders with content-related folders below the yearly folders. When I mount this through Webmin as an smbfs

hi will the official rsync version in future maybe support HFS(+) filesystem, like rsyncx does right now? i ask because the rsyncx version dosen't run on my linuxbox and the feature is only supported if all systems use rsyncx. regards sam

I tried to install kmod-hfs and kmod-hfsplus but not found ? What is up ? the system is all updated with yum update. Jerry

The security.evm extended attribute is fully owned by the Linux kernel and cannot be directly written from userspace. Therefore, we can always skip it. --- xattrs.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/xattrs.c b/xattrs.c index b105392..3b72e61 100644 --- a/xattrs.c +++ b/xattrs.c @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ static int rsync_xal_get(const char *fname,