similar to: Backing up resource forks

HI All, I'm new to this rsync world. Please bear with me if it looks odd. I've downloaded the rsync 2.6.9 version and using it to perform backup to my server. My doubt is when i try to copy a file Does rsync is capable of copying the resource forks of that files as well ? Please advise. Thanks in Advance. Janakiram.

Hello, Our hard drive crashed and we restored a backup under Mac 10.3.9. Unfortunately we lost the executability of the files. The icons do not show up and we have to manually click "Open With" and choose Word/Excel/etc. I have an old backup that has old data, but all of the executibility, permissions, and resource forks are still preserved. Is there anyway to transfer the

I have a feature request for rsync. I tried posting it to the FAQ-o-matic, but that system didn't seem to be accepting new questions. I hope this is an okay list for the request--apologies if it's misdirected. Mac OS X provides support for the Mac file system resource forks and mac specific metadata (e.g., creator and file type). Most Unix applications ignore this information, but it

From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed on more recent versions, or have I hit a bug? I noticed 4.10.6 had some work done regarding AppleDouble and resource forks. In the client log I?m

I'd note that the mkisofs man page listed about a dozen different formats used in various contexts to store Mac resource forks and finder metadata in various contexts. I'd imagine the advent of MacOSX (with UFS support) has narrowed the field of what options are common somewhat, but it's an area where a lot of ad-hoc solutions made it out to the real world. On the other hand, the

> On 23 Oct 2019, at 18.54, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > On 10/23/19 4:31 PM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: >> From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5455 Summary: destination files with resource forks now have current mtime Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi folks, I wish you all a happy new year! I want to migrate a fileserver for Windows und MAC OS clients with ancient versions of samba and netatalk to samba 3.6 (with a samba 4 domain controller), but this raises quite some issues. The new server should - if possible - not be running netatalk. While the package is quite mature, being able to access the same share with both CIFS and AFS

On 10/23/19 4:31 PM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: > From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed on more recent versions, or have I hit a bug? I noticed 4.10.6 had some work done regarding

Hi, Can you help me since upgrading the latest version of rsync on my Xservers I have lost all resouce fork information and I am losing the file types on the backup server. The command I am using is sudo rsync -e ssh -avz /Times_QPS/ 192.168.22.72:/Times_QPS/ Am I missing something simple? -Jason Ferguson *********************************************************************************

As you all know, rsync doesn't have any special handling for Mac OS X HFS+ resource forks. Kevin Boyd made RsyncX and rsync_hfs, to address this gap, but they only work when the destination filesystem is also HFS+. I haven't been able to find any references to an rsync that is capable of syncing from HFS+ to UFS (etc). The only solutions I've seen involve lots of preprocessing

hi will the official rsync version in future maybe support HFS(+) filesystem, like rsyncx does right now? i ask because the rsyncx version dosen't run on my linuxbox and the feature is only supported if all systems use rsyncx. regards sam

On May 21, 2008, at 6:09 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi, > > I've been toying around with the testsuite for a bit, and after > recompiling > llvm-gcc a bunch of times and fixing a nasty bashism bug, I actually > got it to > run and pass most tests. > > When running, I noticed a very long runtime on the lemon test. At > first I > suspected an infinite

We have a central samba file share for our designers (who all use OSX boxes, and mostly use Macromedia products) to work off of. I've lately been able to track down a lot of application quirks (mostly problems with errors when saving, about files being locked) to the Mac resource fork files being indefinitely locked. Here's a sample from a `smbstatus` 14853 DENY_NONE 0x1

I'm trying to use rsync to back up a Mac OS X machine to a Linux server. I've used the instructions at http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html to patch and install rsync 3.0.2 to support HFS+ attributes and forks on the client. I was assuming the Linux box needed the same version, and so tried compiling the patched rsync but got the following: syscall.c: In function

I am using the latest 3.0.0cvs protocol version 30 Capabilities: 64- bit files, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, no ACLs, xattrs xattrs cvs 1.77 I installed xattr for Mac OSX Senario: $ mkdir /Users/alan/Desktop/folder1 $ echo 'Hello' > /Users/alan/Desktop/folder1/file1 $ xattr --set color blue

I am seeking a better workaround than I currently have for the problem. Using OS X 10.3.x and 10.4.x (and possibly other versions) as workstations, and Gentoo Linux (kernel 2.6.16) with Samba 3.0.22, I have the following sequence of events. The symptom is most prevalent when dealing with multi MB files: 1. Resource fork (._ file) gets locked 2. File associated with resource fork also gets

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 Summary: resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-samba at

Dear all, I having this problem on my laptop. It was caused by my clumsy attempts to upgrade the system. As I wrote here, (http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-debian at r-project.org/msg01364.html) I was trying to solve the same problem with JAGS/rjags on my laptop. After typing R in a terminal I'm currently get the following: > R version 2.9.0 (2009-04-17) > Copyright (C) 2009 The R

> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-lucid-x86 on > Network UPS Tools. > Full details are available at: > http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/builds/78 If I understand this correctly, there are multiple copies of some of the man page names in the automake variables: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ../../../docs/man/nut.conf.5