Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "problems making a daily backup via rsync."
2011 Feb 25
1
The problems with rsync continues. (code 255)
Hi there:
As I posted a few days ago I have problems rsyncing two machines. I will add more logs to this e-mail hoping someone could help me.
I'm doing a daily backup calling a shell script from cron as root.
This is the log of the shell script:
------------------------------------- 8< ----------------------- 8< --------------------
[Fri Feb 25 05:21:05 CET 2011] /usr/bin/rsync -az
2018 May 06
1
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Hi all,
New to the mailing lists but have joined up because of above */2.3.1
Replication is throwing scary errors
/*Brief system configuration
??? MX1 - Main
??? ??? Freebsd 11.1-Release-p9
??? ??? Hosted on a Vultr VM in Sydney AU
??? ??? MTA = Postfix 3.4-20180401
??? ??? Dovecot = 2.3.1
??? ??? File system = ufs
??? MX2 - Backup
??? ??? Freebsd 11.1-Release-p9
??? ???? Running on
2007 Aug 19
1
Dovecot on different server than MTA
Hi,
I'm setting up our new mail system using dovecot as mailbox server. As
our goal is to have many many small redundant (virtual) servers as
components, for example a mailhub (just relaying mail) and a frontend
smtp server (just accepting or denying mail in the first place and
then forwarding it to the mailhub), etc. I want to run Dovecot on a
different server than the main MTAs. The mailbox
2018 May 06
2
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Hi Andy,
Funny you say that - I've been testing this very problem for some time
today to narrow down the commits where I think the problem started
occurring.
So far I have been able to roll forward to commit from git:
74ef8506dcb946acc42722683e49fdcb964eed19
>> "doveadm: Unref header search context after use" . So far I have
been running on that code for a few hours
2018 May 06
3
2.3.1 Replication is throwing scary errors
Ah yes. The hash I put below is wrong but the commit message I quoted
was right. This is the last known working good commit, which was on Mar 6:
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/ff5d02182573b1d4306c2a8c36605c98f217ef3b
"doveadm: Unref header search context after use
Fixes memory leak, found by valgrind"
I've subsequently been able to determine that the bad commit was one of
2023 Jan 15
1
dovecot replication - new and cur folders on mx1 and mx2
Hello,
I have a question in regards to specific dovecot replication behaviour
and I'm just wondering if this is actually an expected/normal behaviour,
or just a version issue.
I'm using dovecot 2.3.16 which is packed by default with latest Ubuntu
22.04.1 LTS server release. I setup dovecot replication pair (mx1 - mx2)
which is working ok. MX1 has priority 10, MX2 has priority 20. I
2023 Jan 17
1
dovecot replication - new and cur folders on mx1 and mx2
I can confirm this in a slightly different setting, but still using two-way sync between two dovecots. On e is 2.3.19.1 running on macOS Monterey, the other is 2.3.20 running in an alpine container on Ubuntu.
Gerben Wierda (LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerbenwierda>)
R&A IT Strategy <https://ea.rna.nl/> (main site)
Book: Chess and the Art of Enterprise?Architecture
2020 Jun 13
2
Dovecot Replication Errors (only) when using tcps: as the mail_replica Protocol
Hi,
I've been seeing errors logged for some time with replication processes,
whereby replication sessions seem to be timing out periodically.
This is with dovecot version 2.3.10.1 (a3d0e1171) and both are Gentoo
x86_64.
After some investigation I've determined that these timeouts are only
ever occurring with tcps as the replication connection type. These
errors never occur if
2023 Jan 17
1
dovecot replication - new and cur folders on mx1 and mx2
It might have a noticeable effect on clients.
I encountered (probably triggered by this in some way?) that I was unable to het the 'read' bit set in macOS Mail.app. Maybe (as I am doing HA with round robin) the Mail.app client got to one dovecot repository on one tcp connection and then on the other.
Is there a reason why syncing tis move from new to cur is a bad idea?
Gerben Wierda
2012 May 15
2
Sendmail problem - baffled
Our backup mail server (which I have just re-configured) tries to
contact the primary mail server, and fails. My log shows repeatedly
"connection refused":
May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection
(mail.greenspot.fi. [83.143.217.182]) failed: Connection refused by
mail.greenspot.fi.
May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483:
to=<myuser at
2012 Aug 17
1
DNS DoS attack
Looks like one of my name servers (CentOS 5) gets a lot of malicious
queries. The cpu load is constantly about 3 %. I put on stricter limits
on who is allowed recursive queries, but this does not affect the CPU
load. I also updated bind.
I temporarily turned on querylog (command: rndc querylog), and noticed
that I get over 200 queries like this per second:
> Aug 17 07:41:38 mx2
2001 May 01
3
SRP unencumbered license statement
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, RJ Atkinson wrote:
> At 06:26 27/04/01, Tom Wu wrote:
> >For those of you who were following the discussion about the new draft
> >and implementation of SRP-based password authentication in OpenSSH, I
> >promised to have Stanford issue the IETF an official, explicit,
> >statement reiterating the unencumbered royalty-free licensing terms.
> >The
2018 May 08
2
replicator: User listing returned failure
> I don't know if it makes a difference, I don't have quotes on my
> mail_plugins:
I don't have quotes too (It's difference between config file and dovecot
-n output)
> Did you check permissons on the replication fifos?
For what? I think that problems on slave. How it should work in
automatic mode?
I repeat that from slave manually all works fine:
>> As I
2015 Aug 26
4
please block user
On Wed, August 26, 2015 12:55 pm, James A. Peltier wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> | Hash: SHA1
> |
> | On 25/08/15 23:09, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> | > On 25/08/15 20:39, Alice Wonder wrote:
> | >> julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com
> | >
> | >> Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with
2005 Oct 25
8
Load balancing email?
Currently, we have two mail relays for inbound messages, and a third for POP.
The inbound messages go thru all the CPU-intensive anti-spam stuff, and then
they relay it to the POP server for pickup.
Currently, one of these is the "primary", and the other is "secondary", and
I'd like them to be considered more or less as equals, since the "primary"
system is
2006 Jan 12
2
Auth protocol and Perl
Hi,
does anyone have at working Perl example of how to use the auth protocol
with Perl (I'm planing on making a dovecot auth plugin for qpsmtpd but
it would a lot easier to reuse somebody elses code :))
tia,
--
Allan Joergensen - http://nowhere.dk/
"All right, so it's impossible. How long will it take?"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was
2015 Aug 25
3
please block user
julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com
Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content that is not
suitable for minors.
It is possible subscribed under different address.
IP of offending spam :
Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com [45.55.128.151])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by
2008 Jul 01
5
Configuring sendmail in a corporate environment
I have a stock CentOS 5 system as far as email (sendmail) is
concerned that is on our corporate LAN. I am not trying to set up a
mail server; I merely want our CentOS systems to be able to send out
emails. This works as long as the recipient's domain is our local
domain. Any email send to recipients that are not in our local
domain get stuck in the queue:
# mailq
2007 Nov 22
2
--delete not working - due to 200+G of files?
All of the rsync pages say that "rsync -a --delete src dest" will do a
full mirror but it just isn't so for us.
I've only found one Google item similar:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/rsync-doesnt-seem-to-delete-599985/
We have around 9200 directories in 250G in /home on a Sun 4500 with
Solaris 8 and rsync 2.6.5 - which we are trying to mirror on Sun
2018 May 08
2
replicator: User listing returned failure
Hello Gerald,
> Besides you have configured mysql userdb twice:
>
>> userdb {
>> args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql-master.conf.ext
>> driver = sql
>> }
>> userdb {
>> args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext
>> driver = sql
>> }
Great!!! This was the root cause. Second userdb with
dovecot-sql-master.conf rewrite the first one, but