Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7778] New: --inplace does extra WRITE operations"
2010 Mar 02
9
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7194] New: Getting --inplace and --sparse to work together
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7194
Summary: Getting --inplace and --sparse to work together
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: jansen at
2010 Apr 08
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7337] New: sparse files not equally sparse on destination
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7337
Summary: sparse files not equally sparse on destination
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: brian at
2008 Jan 14
7
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5201] New: Rsync lets user corrupt dest by applying non-inplace batch in inplace mode
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5201
Summary: Rsync lets user corrupt dest by applying non-inplace
batch in inplace mode
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo:
2006 Apr 17
11
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3693] New: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693
Summary: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times,
leading to incorrect hard links
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo:
2007 Jul 30
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4834] New: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4834
Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: joost@seat-ibiza.nl
2009 Dec 26
5
[Bug 25802] New: nouveau driver crashes in exa
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25802
Summary: nouveau driver crashes in exa
Product: xorg
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2013 Feb 25
7
[Bug 61460] New: With Option "NoAccel" "0", xorg fails...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61460
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 61460
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: With Option "NoAccel" "0", xorg fails...
QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
Severity: major
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
Reporter:
2007 Oct 28
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5051] New: --copy-dest copies should use a temporary file unless --inplace
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5051
Summary: --copy-dest copies should use a temporary file unless --
inplace
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2008 May 08
6
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5448] New: rsync modifies files in place even without --inplace specified
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448
Summary: rsync modifies files in place even without --inplace
specified
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2010 Nov 26
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7823] New: Documentation enhancement for --inplace option
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7823
Summary: Documentation enhancement for --inplace option
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: erik at logtenberg.eu
2009 May 19
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6378] New: "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a" reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred size
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6378
Summary: "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a"
reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred
size
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x86
URL: http://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/code/rsync/jing-
2018 Mar 01
29
[Bug 13317] New: rsync returns success when target filesystem is full
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13317
Bug ID: 13317
Summary: rsync returns success when target filesystem is full
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: x64
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2006 Sep 04
7
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] New: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079
Summary: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-
file
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2015 Apr 14
1
The --inplace is very different from the behaviour of --partial when resuming a complex case transfer.
Hi all,
>From the manpage of rsync, I can see the following descriptions:
--inplace
The option implies --partial (since an interrupted transfer does
not delete the file)
So I do the following testings on the `--inplace' and `--partial' for
resuming a file with the following steps:
1- rsync ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/
2010 Jun 16
2
How dangerous is --inplace
Hello list!
How dangerous is acctually the --inplace option if you want to run
rsync to update files that are only read and not written to? What is
the worst that can happen? The file is not readable, the reader gets
half the file of an old version and the rest is from the new version?
There is not a simple way to make it update the file in the standard
way and then change the ownership
2017 Feb 15
1
There is problem of rsync with options --hard-links --inplace.
There is the problem which I discribed here
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=12820.
rsync does not break hard-link into destination if hard-link has be broken
in source with option inplace.
The problem remains in the latest version of rsync?
--
View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/There-is-problem-of-rsync-with-options-hard-links-inplace-tp4714872.html
Sent from
2008 Apr 19
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5404] New: rsync --dry-run should show where files will go
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5404
Summary: rsync --dry-run should show where files will go
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.3
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: nlevitt@gmail.com
2010 Apr 16
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7368] New: Support --link-dest when receiving from a old version
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7368
Summary: Support --link-dest when receiving from a old version
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy:
2009 Dec 13
5
retransfer fail of large files with inplace and broken pipe
Hi,
i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line.
unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken pipe error.
(dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a
reconnect every 24 hours)
i had a script which detect the rsync error and restart the transmission.
this means that if a file has transfered e.g. 80 % i start again from
2014 Dec 26
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
>- --inplace and --append-verify are essentially irrelevant when
>- --link-dest is in play. With --link-dest in play the target system
>must write an entirely new file even for a change in permissions or
>timestamps so any potential benefit by these options are out the
>window from the start. The only thing they can do is add the
>possibility of incomplete or corrupt copies on