similar to: rsync --noperms?

Hello, $ ssh remote mkdir /tmp/tests $ ssh remote mkdir /tmp/tests/test.d $ ssh remote touch /tmp/tests/test $ ssh remote chmod 700 /tmp/tests $ ssh remote chmod 700 /tmp/tests/test.d $ ssh remote chmod 600 /tmp/tests/test $ rsync -rp remote:/tmp/tests /tmp $ chmod o+r /tmp/tests/test.d $ chmod o+r /tmp/tests/test $ rsync -rpcv --info=flist0,stats0 remote:/tmp/tests /tmp -n -i .f...p.....

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12131 Bug ID: 12131 Summary: Rsync reports directories but not files with changed permissions Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Hello :-) According to my reading of the rsyncd.conf man page, "incoming chmod" accepts comma-separated "chmod" strings as defined by the chmod(1) man page optionally prefixed by D or F to make them apply to directories or files. The local chmod(1) man page does not mention strings. It refers to modes which may be symbolic or octal/numeric. Accordingly I tried incoming

The handling of permissions in rsync (2.5.2) is nasty or broken. (tested platforms: Linux 2.4.x and Solaris 7) We have a directory which should only accessible to a group of users (test) : [sn@noname test]$ ls -lda /home/test drwxrws--- 2 root test 4096 Feb 13 15:44 /home/test Every user has an umask of 007 and his/her own default group: [sn@noname sn]$ id uid=500(sn)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Recent versions of rsync have a "regression test" called "chmod-option" that when run fails, this should be causing rsync to be rejected as broken by all distros and sysadmins. A bit of research show that no one has mentioned this test since it was last worked on in late September, nor does it show up as a current bug

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13222 Bug ID: 13222 Summary: rsync creates warning if time of destination file differs in fractional part of second and owner mismatches Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 ------- Additional Comments From woodd@deshaw.com 2005-02-24 16:43 ------- Created an attachment (id=979) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=979&action=view) Proposed syscall.c patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the

Hi, I've build rsync-3.0.6 on a number of legacy unix systems, and on a few systems the regression tests showed up with some errors: HP-UX 11.11 and 11.23 (ia64): FAIL chown FAIL dir-sgid FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize IRIX 6.5.13m: FAIL chown FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize MacOS-X 10.4: FAIL chgrp the errors on "fuzzy" and "itemize" are

Hello, We use rsync to synchronize a large folder hierarchy between servers. Sometimes we notice that the permissions of some directories end up being wrong after rsync is run. The source directory has permissions 755 while target permissions sometimes end up being 700. We are using the --timeout option of rsync, and we have additional watchdog process that will terminate the process if a total

On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: >> Hi, >> >> I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two >> hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. >> Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve >> scripts actually replicating in live time for

On 3/8/2019 4:44 AM, Voytek Eymont via dovecot wrote: > I have Centos 7 with dovecot/postfix/mysql Maildir > > I want to bring in a new server, new server will have same hostname as > current, but, different IP > > I was intending to > rsync -avzhe ssh vmail at oldserver:/var/vmail/vmail1 /var/vmail/vmail1 > > and, then, re run as necessary when/if mail still

On 6 Aug 2001, Albert Chin-A-Young <china@thewrittenword.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:30:50PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: > > Albert, I'd be interested to hear your comments on these, if you have > > time. > > AC_CHECK_TYPE([socklen_t], [int]) is not robust enough. I had a feeling it was too simple to be correct.. :) > Are you familiar with an ftp

I am running the current version of rsync on Androic CM 11.2 and 12.1 on phones and tablets. While syncing to a server works fine, I am having problems with reverse syncing, specifically having the date and time set for files on the reverse sync. Currently the flags are "rsync - vHrlt --chmod=Du+rwx, go-rwx, Fu+rw, go-rw --no-perms -e "ssh -y -p 22 -i '...'...* source

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13239 Bug ID: 13239 Summary: "rsync --times" does not keep dirs' setgid bits when user not member of setgid group Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi, could somebody apply the below patch, please? It removes a couple of environment variables which are propagated to the child process so far, but which not really necessary to keep child processes running. What's left now is the bare minimum which is requested by scripts, typically. Thanks, Corinna Index: openbsd-compat/bsd-cygwin_util.c

Hi Lorenzo and Dale, My setup is like Lorenzo's completely based on setgid being propagated. The filesystem should determine the group used starting at a certain directory. Different "root" directories have different groups, and security is based on groups, not users. I tried all sorts of settings combinations, alseo "force directory mode = 2770", but none propagates

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 Summary: block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

I'm trying to use rsync to keep the permissions between two Windows servers. A windows NT 4 server (with rsync daemon) and windows 2003 R2 I use Rsync in a batch file and I run it as Administrator by double clicking on it. Typically: set cygwin=notnsec rsync -rpDPo --chmod=Du+rwx,Fu+rwx,+X and the files are crossed over but the permissions are screwed up. Now, I can't find out the

Hi guys, How are you ? We have a share named [userprofile] on our Samba-3.0.9 server where each users' profile is stored. Fairly often a user which is not the user that owns the profile i.e and admin, needs to copy files into other users' profile folders. The problem which then arises is that the user who owns the profile is unable to access the new files, due to the UNIX permissions

Hi I use rsync for daily backups from a mailserver. Every day the mailserver pushes backup to the backupserver. Cron runs the command: rsync -q -zrlpt --specials --chmod=Du+rwx \ --rsh 'ssh -F /root/ssh/config -i /root/ssh/private.key -o UserKnownHostsFile=/root/ssh/known_hosts' \ --files-from=/root/include \ --exclude-from=/root/exclude \ --link-dest=../previous \ /