Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "This is a bug, right? (--link-dest)"
2008 Mar 14
1
Possibile rsync --link-dest or --compare-dest bug
Hi all,
I have just migrated my tooling from version 2.6.9 to 3.0.0.
Unfortunately my script generated an error message during the execution.
Because this command was working perfectly in the previous version I suspect
this could be a bug.
This is the command that I am executing:
rsync -av --link-dest=20080313/ --compare-dest=/data/20080313/ 20080313/
/data/20080314/
It just
2019 Jan 02
2
llvm-link: why link '@llvm.global_ctors' into dest file even it's not used in dest file?
Hi all,
Recently I do some jobs based on llvm-link tool.
I wonder why link '@llvm.global_ctors' into dest file, even it's not used
in dest file?
And how can I remove it?
Thank you all in advance!
Fangqing
Xilinx Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2007 Mar 28
3
New Introduction
Hi all,
I''ve just rewritten the Puppet introduction from scratch:
https://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetIntroduction
I think it''s better, but I''m not convinced it''s a whole heckuva lot
better.
Comments are very much appreciated, especially if you can recommend a
better approach to the document. I tried to organize it how I have
been giving
2004 Sep 06
2
problems with --link-dest
Hello,
I'm trying to do backups with rsync through ssh. This is what I wrote yet:
src="/vrmd/webserver/"
today=`date +%F`
#link_dest="root@vm2:/vrmd/admin/backup/web/2004-09-05"
link_dest="../2004-09-05"
dest="root@vm2:/vrmd/admin/backup/web/$today"
rsync -av -e ssh --delete --link-dest=$link_dest $src $dest
in 2004-09-05 (on the dest-server) is the
2005 Jan 14
2
link-dest
Hi,
I've seen the option --link-dest of rsync and this is nearly what I'm
searching for.
Problem for me is that if remotefile exists the link-dest gets not checked
again and I want to be able to pass more than one link-dest to rsync.
Has someone an idea for this?
Lars
2003 Jun 03
1
Rsync: --link-dest when target and compare_dir both have file
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:32:04PM -0700, Michael Rubel wrote:
> Hi J.W.,
>
> Please pardon this intrusion on your private address; the rsync list seems
> to be down (no messages since yesterday), so I'm forwarding this directly
> to you. If you'd rather wait until the list restarts, that's fine too.
I'm CCing the list.
>
> Best regards,
> Mike
>
2025 Jan 12
1
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out why a script works when using SSH but not
when using the rsync protocol. When I run the following command:
rsync -aPh --link-dest=/user/snapshots/rsync_test/last
/home/user/rsync_test
root at readynas.internal:/user/snapshots/rsync_test/Jan_11_2025
it works perfectly, correctly recognizing the link-dest parameter.
However, when I try to run the same command
2025 Jan 12
1
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
rsyncd doesn't take unix paths. You must adapt your --link-dest to
contend with however the rsycd module is defined in rsyncd.conf.
On 1/11/25 9:52 PM, Anthony LaTorre via rsync wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to figure out why a script works when using SSH but not
> when using the rsync protocol. When I run the following command:
>
> rsync -aPh
2025 Jan 12
2
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your quick response. The rsyncd.conf file looks like:
charset = utf-8
[user]
path = /c/user
comment = ""
use chroot = true
uid = root
gid = root
read only = false
auth users = admin
I'm still confused about how to specify the path. The actual UNIX path is:
/c/user/snapshots/rsync_test/last
I've tried:
--link-dest=snapshots/rsync_test/last
2009 Feb 11
2
--link-dest=server::location/folder
I'm wondering if I can use link-dest to compare rsync to a remote
directory.
rsync -aCHh --stats --link-dest=akane::backup/ranma.daily.1 /
myserver::akane/ranma.daily.0
Something like that? Is it going to work like it does when doing a
local rsync with a local link-dest directory? Is it going to chew
massive amounts of bandwidth? Is there something else I should be
doing
2008 Oct 03
3
--link-dest behavior
Greetings All,
I've been thinking about the current behavior of the --link-dest=DIR
option. In the absence of --delete, ALL members of DIR should be linked
to the destination (aside from those that are changed). If not, there
should at least be a --no-link-dest-delete option. (This latter option
might be better to avoid disrupting the behavior of current rsync commands)
My rational: This
2008 Jun 25
3
link-dest storage saving on backup server not on usb hard drive
I have setup rsync to backup another linux computer with the link-dest option
and realized storage savings. 1st backup is 31gb, daily backups only take
approx 4gb. But when I rsync with link-dest to usb external drive all
backups take up 31gb. Following is 1st the one that works and 2nd with no
storage savings. Any ideas? Thanks, Frank
date>/aeprodbk/bkupdate
d=`date +%d`
date > $d.log
2014 Dec 26
2
Re[2]: --link-dest --inplace updates files without unlinking. What to do?
>- --inplace and --append-verify are essentially irrelevant when
>- --link-dest is in play. With --link-dest in play the target system
>must write an entirely new file even for a change in permissions or
>timestamps so any potential benefit by these options are out the
>window from the start. The only thing they can do is add the
>possibility of incomplete or corrupt copies on
2025 Jan 12
1
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
On Sat 11 Jan 2025, Anthony LaTorre via rsync wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response. The rsyncd.conf file looks like:
>
> charset = utf-8
> [user]
> path = /c/user
> comment = ""
> use chroot = true
Note the chroot... So "/" equals /c/user
> uid = root
> gid = root
> read only = false
> auth users = admin
>
> I'm
2014 Jun 06
1
[Bug 10637] rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links"
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637
>
> --- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC ---
> Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due
> to too many hard links.
----------
What would be "too many"? -- a few million? I have files in a test
setup that
2010 Mar 24
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7289] New: --link-dest seen as unknown option
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7289
Summary: --link-dest seen as unknown option
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: pjh at lowell.edu
2003 Oct 28
1
can't manage to get --link-dest working.
Hi,
I can't manage to get rsync's --link-dest option working.
Here is a step by step script which doesn't produce the good results.
# create test dir
mkdir testrsync
cd testrsync
mkdir orig
echo "abcd" > orig/testfile
# create a mirror
rsync -apog orig/ mirror/
# create another mirror using link-dest
rsync -apog --link-dest=mirror/ orig/ mirror2/
# look at inodes
ls
2008 Mar 07
1
--detect-moved patch and --link-dest
Hi,
I am using --link-dest for my rotating backups. Noticing the
"--detect-renamed-lax" patch to rsync 3.0.0. I was hoping to make use
of the --detect-moved. Unfortunately, "--detect-moved" does not seem
to recognize the --linkdest option. A moved file is getting transferred
again and a new file is created at the receiving end instead of
linking to the moved
2003 Dec 20
1
why not link devices with --link-dest option?
I notice that devices are not hardlinked when using the --link-dest
option, for instance:
rsync -aH --link-dest=../bar/ foo/ baz/
When foo/zero is a device, baz/zero is not a hardlink to bar/zero. How
come?
$ rsync --version
rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26
on linux 2.4.x
--
Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.''
seniorr@aracnet.com
2016 Sep 20
2
Use of multiple --link-dest options
I can use --link-dest multiple times for backups so that files affected
by a backup-delete-backup-replace-backup scenario get linked. It works well.
However, consider this scenario: backup-modify-backup-undo-backup. We have
* backup 1 contains file 'a'
* backup 2 contains file 'a' ( with modified content)
* backup 3 contains file 'a'
However, the file 'a' in