similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7070] New: Permission denied message with --fake-super and permissionless directory

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7070] New: Permission denied message with --fake-super and permissionless directory"

2018 Feb 05
2
Unfortunate results from fake-super
On 05/02/18 05:53, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dave Gordon via rsync > <rsync at lists.samba.org <mailto:rsync at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > [...fake-super symlink saved as a file...] > > This results in the copy being world-writable. > > Indeed. The file initially gets created as a mode-600 file, but the code > later
2018 Feb 03
4
Unfortunate results from fake-super
When using fake-super mode in an rsync receiver, anything that's neither a file nor a directory (e.g. devices, symlinks, etc) is converted into a file, and properties such as original ownership, filetype, and permissions are stored in a specific extended attribute. In the case of a symlink, the contents of the link are stored in a plain file. The original mode of the symlink is normally
2018 Feb 06
0
Unfortunate results from fake-super
On 05/02/18 23:03, Dave Gordon via rsync wrote: > On 05/02/18 05:53, Wayne Davison wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dave Gordon via rsync >> <rsync at lists.samba.org <mailto:rsync at lists.samba.org>> wrote: >> >> [...fake-super symlink saved as a file...] >> >> This results in the copy being world-writable. >> >>
2011 Dec 12
11
[Bug 8654] New: link-by-hash: Fix (non-exploitable) buffer overflow
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8654 Summary: link-by-hash: Fix (non-exploitable) buffer overflow Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au
2008 Jul 27
3
imap processes eating IO
[Ignore the previous e-mail, I somehow sent it when I was trying to paste from clipboard] I recently migrated my dovecot/postfix setup to a new machine. After doing so, I have encountered a problem where imap processes get stuck in a loop eating loads of IO on the machine. Looking at the trace (snippet below), it looks like they are sitting and reading the inbox and other folders of
2003 Jan 06
0
smbd using alot of cpu
I have an smbd process that is using alot of cpu on HP-UX 11.11 using Samba 2.2.3a. It looks like the application on the client side is trying to open and close a ton of files, many of which do not exist. When I do a trace on the smbd process, I see repeated calls to lstat64 to what looks like all of the device files on my unix server. Here is a little bit of the trace. It goes through all of the
2007 Oct 08
2
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at main.c(1385)
Hello, i'm trying to backup one of my hosts with a two rsync-scripts, which are mainly just calling on the client side /usr/bin/rsync --server --sender -vlogDtprz --delete-excluded --numeric-ids --exclude-from=/etc/sm-backup/rsync.exclude / and on the server side rsync -avz --numeric-ids -e "ssh -i $key" --delete --delete-excluded rsync@$client:/ $DATA_PATH/$client/daily.0
2002 Jun 18
1
remote rsync process dies, local hangs
I've got an rsync job which is consistently failing, but I've been unable to diagnose the problem. FAQ/Google/docs/etc. checked and no luck. Basically, it looks like the rsync process invoked on the far end is exiting, and then the local process waits until the timeout and exits. Both systems are Sun boxes, Ultra 10 or better with 256+ MB of memory. Rsync version is 2.5.0 on the local
2008 Aug 16
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5695] New: rsync local timeout
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5695 Summary: rsync local timeout Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: gabriele.tozzi@gmail.com QAContact:
2007 Feb 02
1
lstats on all files in Maildir when opening an e-mail.
Hi, I'm running RC19 on a Solaris 10 SPARC box. It seems that whenever I open an e-mail in any folder via IMAP, dovecot appears to scan every other folder in the Maildir. A truss reveals that it is lstat-ing every e-mail in every directory. I'm sorry I am sending only a fragment of the truss, it's really too long... but is this behaviour expected? Cheers, Tan Shao Yi
2011 Feb 15
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7956] New: Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent default ACL
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7956 Summary: Don't error when attempting to delete a non-existent default ACL Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2013 Oct 28
2
[Bug 10233] New: rsync is spending a lot of time lstat64()'ing --exclude'd files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10233 Summary: rsync is spending a lot of time lstat64()'ing --exclude'd files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2005 Jan 03
0
[Bug 2208] New: rsync failed at random file with same error rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown" [sender]: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2208 Summary: rsync failed at random file with same error rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown" [sender]: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at
2002 Sep 11
0
Strange Hang over ssh
rsync-2.4.6-1 RPM on receiving side on Red Hat 7.3 rsync-2.4.6-13 Red Hat 7.2 RPM on sending side Trying to do a "pull" from sender over ssh, rsync hangs after transferring very little data, usually on the first or second file. strace rsync -avzur --bwlimit=35 -e ssh user@remote:/directory /local/directory (init stuff) read(5, "\375\217\177=", 4) = 4 select(6,
2008 Dec 19
4
only root without password
Hi all, I have a very strange problem with the public key authentication with 2 machines. I generated the key, configured the authorized_keys etc.. etc.. This is all ok, now: The ssh works without the password for the "root" user, any other user cannot use the key and ssh ask me for the password !! I cannot understand why only the root is able to connect without the password. So, the ssh
2002 Jul 16
0
Rsync windows to linux is hanging
Hello, I've looked through all the postings and can't seem to find an answer to my delema. I have tested this on an XP and win2k box and get the same results. I'm trying to rsync a fairly large directory (approx. 1.6 GB) from a windows machine to a linux box for backup purposes. The process hangs at the same point everytime. When I try to rsync smaller portions of the same large
2003 Jul 20
1
rsync on cygwin is hanging
I am trying to backup a Windows machine to a Linux machine using rsync (over ssh). I have been able to successfully sync a few files at a time, but when I try to backup an entire tree the process hangs on both machines. I believe this is a different problem than one posted on here before, but I did try this patch with no success:
2011 Dec 12
2
[Bug 8655] New: link-by-hash: add 'link by hash dir' to rsyncd.conf
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8655 Summary: link-by-hash: add 'link by hash dir' to rsyncd.conf Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris
2011 Jun 25
4
[Bug 8266] New: fileflags.diff compile fix
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8266 Summary: fileflags.diff compile fix Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chris at onthe.net.au QAContact:
2008 Mar 05
0
--fake-super and xattr between Linux and Solaris 10
Hello trusty rsync list, I'm excited about --fake-super as it will replace too much work with none at all. I have gotten it to work under linux and I have a fair grasp with what is happening there. I have a problem, though, and that is, in the long term, I'll need to archive my Linux systems not to a Linux box, but to a Solaris 10 box. I understand that Solaris does have extended