similar to: ESTALE error while synching

Hi, I am getting "rsync warning: some files vanished before they could be transferred (code 24) at main.c(1039) [sender=3.0.6]" now frequently but while using rsync version 2.6, I used to get it rarely. Any idea would be helpful on why rsync 3.0.6 is throwing this warning frequently. Jignesh. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hello Friends, Could any atleast one tell me how rsync walk the complete File System and when it start actual synching? Thanks, Jignesh On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Jignesh Shah <jignesh.shah1980@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Friends, > > I think lot of changes have been made from rsync 2.6.0 to V3. The one major > change is rsync V3 will not walk complete file system first and

Hi, Could anyone please tell me how to get the meaning of rsync error codes. In "rsync return code: 12" error, what 12 indicates? Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

This fixes bugzilla 57491. If we take a snapshot of a fs with a unlink ongoing and then try to send that root we will run into problems. When comparing with a parent root we will search the parents and the send roots commit_root, which if we''ve just created the snapshot will include the file that needs to be evicted by the orphan cleanup. So when we find a changed extent we will try

Hi, I am not sure how rsync calculates below statistics and how transfer rate 170583.48 bytes/sec ? Where is the total transfer time information? How speedup is 1? How Total bytes written is 6567384? Could someone please give me brief information on this. Number of files: 4 Number of files transferred: 3 Total file size: 6566219 bytes Total transferred file size: 6566219 bytes Literal data:

Hi, While researching on where rsync-3.0.6 spending more time when we have huge number of files in directory(~1000K files). I got below statistics: 2009/05/28 19:05:38 [9660] building file list . . . 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of files: 724591 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of files transferred: 5674 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Total file size: 63492447862 bytes 2009/05/28

Could any one please help me to get rid of below errors? ERROR: DoRsync(): rsync had errors or failed rsync return code: 23 could not make way for new symlink: bin could not make way for new symlink: etc could not make way for new symlink: include rsync error: some files/attrs were not transferred (see previous errors) (code 23) at main.c(1505)

Hello Friends, Could any one please tell me what is transfer mode and what are the transfer modes available in rsync? Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, I read below lines in rsync v3.0.5 for --relative option. if you used this command: rsync -av /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/ ... this would create a file named baz.c in /tmp/ on the remote machine. If instead you used rsync -avR /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/ then a file named /tmp/foo/bar/baz.c would be created on the remote machine, preserving its full path It is also possible to limit the

Hi, I am using below command. rsync --verbose --log-file-format='%i %f %l %o %b' --log-file='/tmp/myfile' src/ dest/ Though it is good that all the sync information contents will be redirected to /tmp/myfile, it would be useful if rsync could print at least below final statistics on stdout. 2009/05/05 00:17:45 [26050] Number of files: 18 2009/05/05 00:17:45 [26050] Number of

Hi, I was in under impression that rsync 3.0.5/3.0.6 creates all the missing directories in the path but I think I am wrong. Could any one tell me is it possible to create all missing dirs in path at destination side if not exists. Currently, I have been getting below errors. rsync -avz /tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ desthost:/tmp/mytest/rsync-test/dir-test/parent-dir/ sending

Hi, I have one question regarding handling of symlinks in rsync. If I have /source directory in which I have 100s of sub directories of directories and each one has symlink to some directories out side the /source directory hierarchy. Does rsync follows all those symlinks and syncs the data if I specifies below rsync command? rsync -avz /source/ remote.ky:/source/ source | | - source1

Hi, I have gone through the rsync documentation and also tested same both --no-implied-dir and --keep-dirlinks options. My question is what is the difference between these options in below scenario? I have /foo/bar is the symlink to /foo/baz at source and same directory structure with symlink is there at destination. When I sync the data from /foo/bar/* with --relative option specified, I am

Hi, Could any one please tell me if there is any way to remove 11 letters long cryptic output from -ii option. I am using rsync 3.0.5 rsync -av -stats -ii --log-file-format='CONTENTS: %i %f %l %o %b' --log-file='/tmp/rsync-test' Mydocs/ Mydocs1/" The output of this command: 2009/03/31 15:15:17 [4537] building file list 2009/03/31 15:15:29 [4537] created directory Mydocs1

Hi Friends, Does rsync V3 has the feature for logging the files which have not been transferred? Its already logs the file which have been transfered. Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

This server was running fedora core 2 till 12/2/2005. It had an impressive uptime of 180 days or so. On friday I upgraded to CentOS 4.2. After upgrading to CentOS 4.2 this server has been throwing kernel panics every 10 hours or so. These are some of the error messages I am getting on the console: "CPU 0:Machine check exception :4 Bank 0 : f672100000000833 TSC 112180365ccf ADDR e2c7f7c0

On 2 Apr 2019, at 22.37, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > On 2 Apr 2019, at 17.03, Jan-Pieter Cornet via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We're synching mailboxes, changing format from maildir to mdbox, using doveadm backup/doveadm sync. >> >> When

Hi, same here, this doesn't seeem to be fixed with latest pigeonhole and dovecot release. Regards, Marcel Am 03.05.2019 um 08:20 schrieb Piper Andreas via dovecot: > Hello, > > Am 02.04.19 um 21:51 schrieb Timo Sirainen via dovecot: >> On 2 Apr 2019, at 22.37, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org >> <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote:

Hi, We have been planning to upgrad rsync 3.0.5. I have some question on this so that we will not screwed up the file systems. We have been using rsync 2.6.7 since long and we didn't have any major problems. I am wondering if we upgrade rsync 3.0.5 then will it cause any unexpected behaviour then rsync 2.6.7? Can we directly upgrade it without any problems? It would be nice if someone suggest

Hi folks, I am running an offline Rails app that periodically connects to the Internet to download the latest catalogue, and upload any new orders. I am about to implement the synching bit - and was thinking whether there is any other solution other than writing webservices and code to do a manual sync of the data, or whether there is a more nifty and robust way using say replication?