similar to: Rsync & parallelizing it for files in same directory

Hi there, I've asked this question to the BSD group too, but I'd like to know whether anybody else had similar experiences on Linux 2.6.20 etc.?? FreeBSD 6.2 Asterisk 1.4.5 (and 1.4.3 from ports) Sip phone - PBX(*) -IAX2-VROUTER(*)- SIP-Voip provider (SPA901 & SPA922 phones) We've see a situation where the IAX2 appears to "loose"/drop the voice data to be sent to

Hi there, I'm in a situation where some of my clients have all these obscurity things with ssh, like putting it on a different port, or a different user to login for this specific host not mention several don't have proper DNS names and and and. Life is to short to debate it with the client so rather get in line, use ssh_config, and continue to serve the client. However, now I have the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 No, even if bandwidth is your concern I would say that --checksum is wrong. Maybe if bandwidth is so scarse that a few KB vs a few MB equates to dollars then sure, use --checksum. Otherwise, letting rsync re-delta-xfer everything is certainly faster and not much more bandwidth intensive than --checksum. Plus that is only if you screwed up and ran

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just letting rsync re-copy everything and therefore is almost always the wrong thing to do. However, in this case, you really don't want to overwrite the running OS even with files that are essentially the same. So, if the system is running from that storage then --checksum might

Hi there, I have a need to have scp pass the -P option to ssh to "bypass" the packetfilters that doesn't allow connections to return to arbitary "priviledged" ports, ie. ports <1024. See attached context sensitive diffs against 2.2.0p1 to please integrate. Thanx Hendrik Visage -------------- next part -------------- *** 1.1 2000/10/11 13:31:45 --- scp.c 2000/10/11

Dear List, I just googled "superlifter" and found below link, but I can't get any source code. http://superlifter.sourceforge.net/ Any help or info on this is mostly appreciated. And sorry for the trouble, if it's NOT allowed to post here. THanks. -- Daniel

Hey everyone, I am a final semester MCA student. I've chosen rsync as the subject of my project for my graduation. Hence I would appreciate it if someone could guide me with some ideas on how I can contribute to rsync. I will work hard to implement whatever suggestions that you can all give me. I would definitely like to know what are some of the issues concerning rsync. May be I can then

Hi! I do a rsync between 2 machines. The throughput is only 2 MByte/Sec. Each machine is a Supermicro server with 2 x 8 Core Opteron 6128 64 GByte of ECC RAM 1 LSI MegaRAID SAS 9280-24i4e 24 x 2TByte SATA Disks as a RAID6 2 Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network-cards Both run Ubuntu 11.04 64Bit. Both use rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 There are no

Conclusion: DO NOT USE SOFTWARE RAID-1 WITH EXT3 I've started with this conclusion cause i am positive that raid-1 and ext3 are causing data corruption. I've upgraded from 7.1 to 7.2 and from the first date i run into data corruption problems @ least once per day (i was monitoring once per day only) after 7 days we bought a brand new server cause the previous was very old and i thought

Database on a remote machine res_pgsql.conf: [general] dbhost=172.16.0.2 dbport=5432 dbname=ast_config dbuser=pbx dbpass= dbsock=5432 [Nov 28 20:12:02] DEBUG[6581] res_config_pgsql.c: Postgresql RealTime Host: 172.16.0.2 [Nov 28 20:12:02] DEBUG[6581] res_config_pgsql.c: Postgresql RealTime Port: 5432 [Nov 28 20:12:02] DEBUG[6581] res_config_pgsql.c: Postgresql RealTime User: pbx [Nov 28

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just > letting rsync re-copy everything Depends on the network capacity and costs associated with that bandwidth :( >and therefore is almost always the > wrong thing to do. Nope,

Hi all!! I copy files and directories from server with Windows 2000 Server to server with Debian. The copy made with rsync, the instruction is the next: rsync -av --iconv=WINDOWS-1252,utf-8 directory from windows 2000 server directory from Debian There are the error: file has vanished What happenned? thanks -- Xavi Aranda Equip T?cnic ? ASSOCIACI? PER A JOVES TEB Carrer dels

Hi, Using the following script (which runs fine as root in a terminal), I get the error below. Any ideas where to continue searching? sh-2.05b$ rsync --version rsync version 2.6.2 protocol version 28 Copyright (C) 1996-2004 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, IPv6, 64-bit system

We're looking at a large wifi phone deployment, and we're looking for wifi phones that: 1. Are SIP compliant (Asterisk friendly) 2. Provision capable (ideally TFTP of own MAC address) 3. Industrial quality (no cheap plastic stuff). 4. Well documented (and none of the "only telco's get documentation" crap) Does anyone have a suggestion? Thanks, MD -------------- next

----- Original Message ----- From: "hvjunk" <hvjunk at gmail.com> To: "Adam Ru" <ad.ruckel at gmail.com> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 9:29:03 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster and NFS-Ganesha - cluster is down after reboot Sorry, got sidetracked with invoicing etc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, opensuse 13.2 linux v3.16.7-7-desktop x86_64 rsync v3.1.1 I used rsync to copy /usr/ to another volume with these options: - --recursive --one-file-system --links --stats --itemize-changes - --quiet --delete --times After I had modified the system to use the new /usr volume, I realized I should have added: - --perms --owner --group

Hi hvjunk, could you please tell me have you had time to check my previous post? Could you please send me mentioned link to your Gluster Ansible scripts? Thank you, Adam On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Adam Ru <ad.ruckel at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi hvjunk (Hi Hendrik), > > "centos-release-gluster" installs "centos-gluster310". I assume it > picks the

Sorry, got sidetracked with invoicing etc. https://bitbucket.org/dismyne/gluster-ansibles/src/6df23803df43/ansible/files/?at=master <https://bitbucket.org/dismyne/gluster-ansibles/src/6df23803df43/ansible/files/?at=master> The .service files are the stuff going into SystemD, and they call the test-mounts.sh scripts. The playbook installing higher up in the directory > On 05 Jun 2017,

Hi list, After reading rsync docu and doing online search, I still failed to find a simple solution for following problem: The goal is to sync two directories using rsync without running the rsync daemon on one of the two hosts. The standard shell sync does not work because of the network topology: Ssh connect to SRC-Host ^ Base host (with ssh keys) v Ssh connect to bridge

I am rsyncing several hunderds of thousands of files in several directories. The way I got rsync to work for me was I wrote a script which NFS mounts the directory I am rsyncing first before starting, and then it goes through the directories and rsyncs them in bite sizeable chunks by going a few directories deep and starting there.. Is there any way to have this as an option inside rsync