Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "--link-dest, update permissions w/o creating a new file"
2008 Oct 03
3
--link-dest behavior
Greetings All,
I've been thinking about the current behavior of the --link-dest=DIR
option. In the absence of --delete, ALL members of DIR should be linked
to the destination (aside from those that are changed). If not, there
should at least be a --no-link-dest-delete option. (This latter option
might be better to avoid disrupting the behavior of current rsync commands)
My rational: This
2010 May 31
3
scp port on remote hosts
Hello,
I would like to specify ports on both hosts to copy files between two
remote computeres. Is there any way to do this with scp? The -P flag
seems to apply to the port on the second host only.
Regards,
Miguel
2003 Mar 15
1
Dirvish, --link-dest and permissions
(I'm not sending this to dirvish@pegasus because I think that this message
applies more to rsync's --link-dest option than to just dirvish.)
I recently noticed a huge spike in dirvish network usage and traced it to
files whose permissions had been changed. (with rsync v2.5.6)
I understand and agree that a --link-dest copy of a source file cannot be
hardlinked to, but couldn't a
2008 Jun 01
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5509] New: Mention OS X "Ignore permissions" in --link-dest docs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5509
Summary: Mention OS X "Ignore permissions" in --link-dest docs
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: All
URL: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-
August/013394.html
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
2006 Feb 24
1
Fwd: Re: How to use multiple link-dest directories?
I forward Maynard's suggestions to the list.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Maynard Handley <name99@name99.org>
To: Matt McCutchen <hashproduct@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: How to use multiple link-dest directories?
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:31:56 -0800
Great. That's exactly the sort of answer I wanted. I'll try it tonight.
(BTW, I guess maybe it got lost since I
2007 Jul 16
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4793] New: link-dest hardlink does not always work well with -o -g -p
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4793
Summary: link-dest hardlink does not always work well with -o -g
-p
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: PPC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2008 Oct 29
1
Thorough distributed backup/sync strategy
Does anyone have a good distributed backup strategy? I've been revising
mine for a year or so now and always realize there's some hole or
another in it. I get the feeling to do it exactly the way I want it
needs to be complex, but I'm looking for something elegant.
My data consists of some of these representative folders:
.mozilla
Documents
Pictures
.ssh
Music
bin
And these
2006 Feb 24
1
How to use multiple link-dest directories?
Hi guys,
I hope this is not considered a stupid question, but it really seems
to be something that needs to be covered with a decent example in the
man page. I have looked in every piece of documentation I can think
of and have found no answer.
So I want to use the multiple link-dest directories feature as of
2.6.4. (I am using 2.6.6)
My understanding of how this should work is that I can
2009 Feb 06
2
--chmod for destination only
Is it possible to set the permissions on the destination side? As I
understand it, --chmod just pretends certain permissions are coming from
the sending side. I'd like to be able to set permissions to readonly in
the destination while coming from a --copy/link-dest which may more may
not have had it's permissions changed.
2015 Apr 15
1
rsync --link-dest won't link even if existing file is out of date
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/14/2015 11:35 PM, Henri Shustak wrote:
>> Ill take a look but I imagine I cant backup the 80 Million files
>> I need to in under the 5 hours i have for nightly
>> maintenance/backups. Currently it's possible by recycling
>> directories...
I would expect that recycling directories actually makes this worse.
With an
2003 Nov 17
1
printer permissions <-> ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy (samba 3.0.0)
Hi Jerry et al,
I'm using SAMBA 3.0.0 on Solaris 9, it looks very cute, unfortunately I
can not set the permissions on the printers (I can as an admin add a
user etc. but all changes are lost after applying):-(
Is this somehow related to the error entries in the log file:
[2003/11/17 14:45:31, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
If so will it be fixed in
2009 May 09
7
does somebody use XCode on Mac for RoR instead of TextMate?
does somebody use XCode on Mac for RoR instead of TextMate? I wonder
how is it compared to TextMate... TextMate uses the default font of
Monaco... the Xcode screenshot on Wikipedia uses Courier... I wonder if
Xcode looks as good as TextMate when the font is changed to Monaco as
well? Thank you.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2019 Jan 02
2
llvm-link: why link '@llvm.global_ctors' into dest file even it's not used in dest file?
Hi all,
Recently I do some jobs based on llvm-link tool.
I wonder why link '@llvm.global_ctors' into dest file, even it's not used
in dest file?
And how can I remove it?
Thank you all in advance!
Fangqing
Xilinx Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2006 Apr 17
12
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3693] New: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693
Summary: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times,
leading to incorrect hard links
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo:
2016 Jul 25
2
[Bug 12036] New: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest flags produce incorrect behavior
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12036
Bug ID: 12036
Summary: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest
flags produce incorrect behavior
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component:
2008 Mar 14
1
Possibile rsync --link-dest or --compare-dest bug
Hi all,
I have just migrated my tooling from version 2.6.9 to 3.0.0.
Unfortunately my script generated an error message during the execution.
Because this command was working perfectly in the previous version I suspect
this could be a bug.
This is the command that I am executing:
rsync -av --link-dest=20080313/ --compare-dest=/data/20080313/ 20080313/
/data/20080314/
It just
2008 Nov 09
7
How to delete files older than X on backup during sync?
Hi list,
I have been reading MAN pages and listarchives, but not found the
answer to my question though I am sure it must be possible to acheive
my wish.
I wish to use rsync to create a backup BUT only keep the files for a
limited period of time, EG two weeks.
I have not yet been able to figure out how to do this inside rsync
(while the backup is being performed) and my understanding of the
2013 Dec 03
5
Multiple ISP + traffic shapping = poor download speed
Hello,
Thanks for the great Shorewall which has replaced my hard to maintain home-made scripts.
First, what works.
Our local network is 10.48.X.X with multiple vlan, each on a dedicated interface. We use Shorewall 4.4.11 from Debian Squeeze.
We have a 2 ISP:
- isp1 : an optical fiber provider with 10 Mbps.
- isp2 : a DSL provider with 15Mbits/1Mbits.
We use isp2 as the default outgoing
2008 Sep 28
2
Does "--link-dest" option supports link to remote backup server?
Hello everyone:
I keeps using rsync to backup my files on my laptop from one folder to
another, and to reduce disk usage, so I use "--link-dest" option for
incremental backup like this:
*rsync -a --link-dest=/local/old /tmp/myfile /local/new*
And "/local/old" is backuped some days ago, I use "--link-dest" option to
keep unchanged files as links to new destination
2003 Dec 20
1
why not link devices with --link-dest option?
I notice that devices are not hardlinked when using the --link-dest
option, for instance:
rsync -aH --link-dest=../bar/ foo/ baz/
When foo/zero is a device, baz/zero is not a hardlink to bar/zero. How
come?
$ rsync --version
rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26
on linux 2.4.x
--
Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.''
seniorr@aracnet.com