similar to: Atomic operations in rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5804 Summary: Make atomic-rsync atomic Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: matt@mattmccutchen.net QAContact:

Hi, Apparently a change of behaviour from rsync 2.5 to rsync 2.6 affected the way I worked. I provide RPM repositories that I mirror using rsync. It is important to have the repository meta-data in sync with the data otherwise people have errors using Yum or Apt. In the old days (with older rsyncs) I was able to influence the order in which my transaction set was processed by changing the

Hi Sanjoy, Responses inlined… > On May 8, 2017, at 12:49 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > [+CC Mehdi, Vedant for the auto upgrade issue] > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Neilson via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> **Method** >> >> Clearly we are going to have to teach

Hello, all. Sorry if this topic has been hashed out before -- I didn't see it searching the archives of this list. I want to mirror a local system's /apps and /usr/local directories (both are real directories, not symlinks) to a remote system where /apps and /usr/local are symlinks to /local/apps and /local/usrlocal, respectively. The target directories exist on the remote system.

Greetings all, I am picking up the work that was started in https://reviews.llvm.org/D27133 — adding support for an element-atomic memcpy/memset/memmove to LLVM. I would appreciate suggestions/thoughts/advice/comments on how to best proceed with this work in a way that will be acceptable to the LLVM group. I apologize in advance; this is going to be a long one... **Background** Loads/stores

Hi, i have a couple of questions I would appreciate if someone could answer... 1) Are there any guidelines for estimating server load? I am going to be running a couple of RSync servers and don't even have an order of magnitude guess as to what kind of load they can handle, how many sessions I should allow at once, etc. The data set I'll be serving is about 7000 files, an update to them

Hello - Running rsync v3.0.5 on a mixture of CentOS 4.6 and 5.1 systems, using hpnssh as the transport mechanism. I am using rsync to replicate roughly a TB worth of compressed log data per day from a bunch of systems for processing. Every hour the systems generate log files, compress them and then rsync pushes them out to a centralized set of redundant hosts with their storage connected to a

Hi Evan, Evan Cheng wrote: > The patch looks great. But I do have one comment: > > +let usesCustomDAGSchedInserter = 1 in { > + let Uses = [CR0] in { > + let Uses = [R0] in > + def ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD_I32 : Pseudo< > > The "let Uses = [R0]" is not needed. The pseudo instruction will be > expanded like this later: > > + BuildMI(BB,

Look for createVirtualRegister. These are examples in PPCISelLowering.cpp. Evan On Jul 8, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Evan Cheng wrote: >> The patch looks great. But I do have one comment: >> >> +let usesCustomDAGSchedInserter = 1 in { >> + let Uses = [CR0] in { >> + let Uses = [R0] in >> + def ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD_I32 :

Hi Gary, The patch looks great. But I do have one comment: +let usesCustomDAGSchedInserter = 1 in { + let Uses = [CR0] in { + let Uses = [R0] in + def ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD_I32 : Pseudo< The "let Uses = [R0]" is not needed. The pseudo instruction will be expanded like this later: + BuildMI(BB, TII->get(is64bit ? PPC::LDARX : PPC::LWARX), dest) +

Hi, Well, I need the procedure or how to do a full backup of archives to a directory. Then, do incremental backups in different directories. For example: source-dir to dest-dir a full backup. incremental of sources-dir and differential of backup-dir in `date +%m%h%y` Then, i should have a full backup in the dest-dir and incremental+diferential backup in every $DATE directory. Any ideas? I try

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:32:04PM -0700, Michael Rubel wrote: > Hi J.W., > > Please pardon this intrusion on your private address; the rsync list seems > to be down (no messages since yesterday), so I'm forwarding this directly > to you. If you'd rather wait until the list restarts, that's fine too. I'm CCing the list. > > Best regards, > Mike >

Hi all, I have just migrated my tooling from version 2.6.9 to 3.0.0. Unfortunately my script generated an error message during the execution. Because this command was working perfectly in the previous version I suspect this could be a bug. This is the command that I am executing: rsync -av --link-dest=20080313/ --compare-dest=/data/20080313/ 20080313/ /data/20080314/ It just

Evan Cheng wrote: > You need to insert new basic blocks and update CFG to accomplish this. > There is a hackish way to do this right now. Add a pseudo instruction > to represent this operation and mark it usesCustomDAGSchedInserter. > This means the intrinsic is mapped to a single (pseudo) node. But it > is then expanded into instructions that can span multiple basic >

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693 Summary: rsync can use same --link-dest file several times, leading to incorrect hard links Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448 Summary: rsync modifies files in place even without --inplace specified Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi, I want to use rsync to make daily backups using hard-links in this way: rsync -av --delete --link-dest=../backup_old ./source/. ./backup_new This works great, but the problem is, that rsync does not show correctly what action it performs (-v option). It shows correctly all new and changed files/folders, but it does not show files that were deleted. This works only if I do not use the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5802 Summary: misleading error message in atomic rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: normalperson@yhbt.net

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 Summary: rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Kontakt at

I've been very interested in these discussions and uses of rsync as a "clone" of Time Machine. A couple of things have been keeping me from a fully automated solution. I'd like to eliminate the need for Samba/NFS mounts of any kind, because they have proven to be unreliable for me and under some operating environments (Cygwin) it breaks --link-dest. In most of the articles