similar to: openssh vulnerability

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer<fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > Is this really a problem for MLton?  I think you only get less precise > alias analysis, and that's it. Correct. However, I want a fair comparison between LLVM performance and the native x86 codegen. If I don't give LLVM the same information the x86 codegen has, it's an unfair comparison.

On Sunday 14 June 2009 14:09:33 Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer<fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > > Is this really a problem for MLton?  I think you only get less precise > > alias analysis, and that's it. > > Correct. However, I want a fair comparison between LLVM performance > and the native x86 codegen. If I don't

* Rahul Chaudhry via gnu-gabi: > The encoding used is a simple combination of delta-encoding and a > bitmap of offsets. The section consists of 64-bit entries: higher > 8-bits contain delta since last offset, and lower 56-bits contain a > bitmap for which words to apply the relocation to. This is best > described by showing the code for decoding the section: > > typedef

* Scott Michel: > On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an > unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) > > I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. > > On the x86_64 buildbot, the same test fails. The culprit is grep, > evidently. It's just that simple. There have been issues the GNU libc

* Neale Ferguson: > So the SimpleTy variable which is a SimpleTypeValue is behaving strangely. > It's found within a private definition: > > union { > uintptr_t V; > SimpleValueType SimpleTy; > const Type *LLVMTy; > }; > > The comment in the above fix indicates that in this 64-bit system the enum > needs to be 64-bits is correct,

* Wesley W. Terpstra: >> Logically, what you want is a distinct LLVM type for every ML union type >> and each of its constructors.  Unfortunately, LLVM does structural >> uniquing of types, so that won't work. > > Is there absolutely no way to generate a new type? Not even an > 'opaque' one? Is this really a problem for MLton? I think you only get less

* Roland McGrath: > Given this corpus of "reloc traces" you can code up many competing encoding > formats and do serious measurements of their space savings across the > entire corpus from simple simulations without having to implement each > encoding in an actual toolchain and dynamic linker to do the analysis. On the other hand, the linker currently assumes that the order

Hi all, I am new to Wine and Linux. I am currently running Ubuntu 8.04 with Wine 1.0-rc2 on an old Dell Inspiron 2650 laptop. For the last couple of days, I have been trying to get my Linkword language learning software to work on my laptop (Rosetta Stone seems like a lost cause at this point). A little about this program, it is a "stand alone" type program, and by that I mean

Hi all. Got a strange question for you (it's for an industrial setting.) I have a large folder (15TB) on a *buntu server that I'd like to have available to a Windows 2000 Server VM machine (don't ask.) The host filesystem is ext4, but Samba shouldn't care about that. What I'm wondering is will Windows be able to access/utilize all the space on that, or is it going to start

I've just installed v6.3 as a desktop (from Centos-6.3-i386-LiveCD.iso) and to get the hang of the Centos approach and then hope to move on to a server. I've been using linux *buntu for 5 years. Hope i don't sound like a nit but i've got a little confused with the repos. Hoping someone would be kind enough just to clarify. This installation is for stability whilst installing the

Hi, I have recently upgraded to dovecot v2.3 on Ubuntu 16.04.3 from repo.dovecot.org and I switched to IMAPSieve for rspamd with the guide from the wiki. When a mail is moved from Junk to another Inbox or vice-versa imap segfaults. I have posted debug logs and versions below, any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Rhys Williams lux at bifrost:~$ dovecot --version 2.3.0 (c8b89eb) lux at

The generic-abi thread has gone into broader subjects of the benefits and desireability of the work. I'm willing to take it as given that the encoded size of pure-relative address relocs (i.e. R_*_RELATIVE equivalents)--ultimately the RODATA segment size of a given ET_DYN file--as sole metric is a worthy goal and the ballpark savings ratios we're seeing are worth committing to a new ABI.

I searched the archives and found this from last month: I ran into the same problem and fixed it by forcing the MVT::SimpleValueType enum to be 64 bits so that all of the types in the union later in the class are the same size. I tested this on ppc64 and x86_64. Index: include/llvm/CodeGen/ValueTypes.h =================================================================== ---

pigeonhole 0.5.0 has been already released... ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Daniel Kenzelmann <dovecot.org at k8n.de> Date: 03/01/2018 21:31 (GMT+02:00) To: Rhys Williams <lux+mailinglists at melted.me>, dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: dovecot v2.3.0: imap segfault when sieve_extprograms_plugin.so ? called Hi, see the following thread:

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 9:44 PM, John McCall<rjmccall at apple.com> wrote: > On Jun 13, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: > Currently I just represent %c as i8*. I assume that this can have > consequences in terms of aliasing. I tried opaque*, but llvm-as didn't > like that. Is there any way to better represent the type %c to LLVM? > > I assume this is for

I am trying to figure out if I am missing something simple here. After upgrading to puppet 3.0 running puppet-rspec tests that use custom resources from modules in the fixtures directory are failing. I have a module that uses the anchor type and with 2.7.19 it works fine. After upgrading to 3.0 all of the tests are failing with Puppet::Error: Puppet::Parser::AST::Resource failed with

Hi, Does anyone know how to prevent snmpd from writing the below into /var/log/messages/ Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity snmpd[2287]: Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34309 Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity snmpd[2287]: Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34309 Nov 29 19:35:02 serenity last message repeated 7 times Nov 29 19:40:02 serenity snmpd[2287]: Connection from UDP: [127.0.0.1]:34313 Nov 29

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-5.2 After clean upgrade from Lenny I got xend highly use CPU resources causing domU don't being created - due to timeouts for vifs and vbds (mostly CPU Steal Time was increasing - no iowaits). Tried Xen boot options acpi=noirq|ht without success. Option acpi=off solved that issue, but performance of the server was horrible. The final workaround was to

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > * Scott Michel: > >> On my _local_ x86_64 Ubuntu 7.10 machine, the shift_ops.ll is an >> unexpected success (i.e., "grep -w shlh %t1.s | count 9" succeeds.) >> >> I get the same unexpected success on my x86_64 Mac 10.4.11. >> >> On the x86_64 buildbot, the same

>On Sunday 14 June 2009 14:09:33 Wesley W. Terpstra wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Florian Weimer<fw at deneb.enyo.de> wrote: >> > Is this really a problem for MLton? I think you only get less precise >> > alias analysis, and that's it. >> >> Correct. However, I want a fair comparison between LLVM performance >> and the native x86