similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5455] New: destination files with resource forks now have current mtime

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5867 Summary: rsync with ACLs resets mtime on targets Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: samba@byshenk.net

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7683 Summary: New rsync deletes destination files it shouldn't Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy:

So, I backed up a Mac OS X workstation that crashed, and learned the hard way that OS X uses things ( particularly for fonts, it seems) known as 'resource forks', which don't get backed up with normal tools. Ouch. A little research showed me that rsync (2.6.9) for Mac supports the -E option, which is supposed to back up the resource forks, too. But when I rsync over to a Ubuntu Lucid

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6747 Summary: rsync recopies files with diacritics in the file names. Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: mmcmonster

Hi folks, I wish you all a happy new year! I want to migrate a fileserver for Windows und MAC OS clients with ancient versions of samba and netatalk to samba 3.6 (with a samba 4 domain controller), but this raises quite some issues. The new server should - if possible - not be running netatalk. While the package is quite mature, being able to access the same share with both CIFS and AFS

HI All, I'm new to this rsync world. Please bear with me if it looks odd. I've downloaded the rsync 2.6.9 version and using it to perform backup to my server. My doubt is when i try to copy a file Does rsync is capable of copying the resource forks of that files as well ? Please advise. Thanks in Advance. Janakiram.

Hello, Our hard drive crashed and we restored a backup under Mac 10.3.9. Unfortunately we lost the executability of the files. The icons do not show up and we have to manually click "Open With" and choose Word/Excel/etc. I have an old backup that has old data, but all of the executibility, permissions, and resource forks are still preserved. Is there anyway to transfer the

I'd note that the mkisofs man page listed about a dozen different formats used in various contexts to store Mac resource forks and finder metadata in various contexts. I'd imagine the advent of MacOSX (with UFS support) has narrowed the field of what options are common somewhat, but it's an area where a lot of ad-hoc solutions made it out to the real world. On the other hand, the

On 10/23/19 4:31 PM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: > From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed on more recent versions, or have I hit a bug? I noticed 4.10.6 had some work done regarding

> On 23 Oct 2019, at 18.54, Ralph Boehme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > On 10/23/19 4:31 PM, Perttu Aaltonen via samba wrote: >> From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed

From version 4.10.6 onwards folder icons are not working anymore on macOS. I can see the "._Icon?? file written on disk but seems like Samba isn?t reading it back and presenting it to the client. Is there a change or new setting that is needed on more recent versions, or have I hit a bug? I noticed 4.10.6 had some work done regarding AppleDouble and resource forks. In the client log I?m

I have a feature request for rsync. I tried posting it to the FAQ-o-matic, but that system didn't seem to be accepting new questions. I hope this is an okay list for the request--apologies if it's misdirected. Mac OS X provides support for the Mac file system resource forks and mac specific metadata (e.g., creator and file type). Most Unix applications ignore this information, but it

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3485 Summary: rsync uses more space in destination even with -S specified Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

What is the order that rsync uses to set permissions? Time Machine directories have ACL permissions that basically prohibit making any changes of any kind. In order to make a backup of the directory, you would need to set those permissions after copying everything in the subdirectories. Is rsync smart enough to do it in that order? On 2018-03-19, at 10:44 PM, Andre Althoff via rsync <rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10272 Summary: resource fork handling is broken in 3.1.0 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-samba at

hi will the official rsync version in future maybe support HFS(+) filesystem, like rsyncx does right now? i ask because the rsyncx version dosen't run on my linuxbox and the feature is only supported if all systems use rsyncx. regards sam

Hi, Can you help me since upgrading the latest version of rsync on my Xservers I have lost all resouce fork information and I am losing the file types on the backup server. The command I am using is sudo rsync -e ssh -avz /Times_QPS/ 192.168.22.72:/Times_QPS/ Am I missing something simple? -Jason Ferguson *********************************************************************************

That doesn’t work too. :-( Last login: Mon Mar 19 19:18:16 on console iMac:~ andre$ mount /dev/disk0s2 on / (hfs, local, journaled) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse) map -hosts on /net (autofs, nosuid, automounted, nobrowse) map auto_home on /home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse) /dev/disk2 on /Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3 (hfs, local, nodev, nosuid, journaled, noowners) iMac:~ andre$

I am checking a file system (ext3) as shown below. It is actually a fresh file system, as I had deleted all partitions and created an ext3 file system. But when I run the check with the verbose option, it says I have one large file. Am I missing something here, or is it odd that I cannot find this large file it is reporting? I reviewed some documentation on ext3 file systems, and experimented

As you all know, rsync doesn't have any special handling for Mac OS X HFS+ resource forks. Kevin Boyd made RsyncX and rsync_hfs, to address this gap, but they only work when the destination filesystem is also HFS+. I haven't been able to find any references to an rsync that is capable of syncing from HFS+ to UFS (etc). The only solutions I've seen involve lots of preprocessing