similar to: [PATCH] Fix spelling/grammar in NEWS.

--- I proofread NEWS and here's what I found. NEWS | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index d1f62be..2edb43f 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -116,11 +116,11 @@ Changes since 2.6.9: options are set correctly for the current batch file: --iconv, --acls, --xattrs, --inplace, --append, and --append-verify. - - Using

--- Since the process executing the code inside the previous "if" (which doesn't close the log file) sets am_server = 1, I think the comment is backwards. pipe.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/pipe.c b/pipe.c index 12aa73d..101d4cb 100644 --- a/pipe.c +++ b/pipe.c @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ pid_t local_child(int argc, char **argv, int *f_in, int

--- Makefile.in | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.in b/Makefile.in index 98486f4..fee32b7 100644 --- a/Makefile.in +++ b/Makefile.in @@ -171,11 +171,14 @@ cleantests: # the source directory. distclean: clean rm -f Makefile config.h config.status + rm -f lib/dummy popt/dummy zlib/dummy rm -f $(srcdir)/Makefile $(srcdir)/config.h

Hi, The problem I found is not in what rsync, but on the error handling: How to reproduce: On server side I setup a tree and share using rsync + xinetd, of course, for security reason I use chroot option. Now I push this symlink: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 nov 10 16:28 horsroot -> /bin/ Now I try to do: ./rsync -avPH --copy-unsafe-links draco::test/ /tmp/rsyncdest/ (Of course the

Hi, the combination of --keep-dirlinks and --delete (--delete-during, --delete-delay) erroneously deletes symlinks to directories on the receiver. With --delete-before and --delete-after it works as expected. (rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version, on Debian Lenny) I don't think that this behaviour is intended. Details/example: - Host 1 directory-structure: drwx------ ./1

Hello folks, trying to make use of the new --keep-dirlinks feature for a synch port; it works excellent but feels incomplete without a way for rsync to ignore recursive links. Example: # ls -la . total 6 drwxrwxr-x 2 bldmstr staff 512 Aug 16 21:42 . drwxrwxr-x 8 bldmstr staff 512 Aug 16 21:41 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 bldmstr staff 2 Aug 20 12:07 bogus -> .. if you use

Hello, I'm trying to push some data from one machine to another via rsync source machine uses rsync 3.0.8, it's a CentOS 5.6 Linux with rsync 3.0.8 package from rpmforge destination machine uses rsync 3.0.6, it's a Scientific Linux 6.0 with rsync 3.0.6 from its repository destination machine is running a rsync daemon with the following configuration: log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log

I've been using the --keep-dirlinks feature of 2.6.3pre1. I also use -x (--one-file-system) and --delete-after. The symlinked directories on the receiver are symlinked to a partition other than the one where the target of the rsync resides (that's the whole point of this nifty --keep-dirlinks feature). I discovered that the symlinked directories are not being processed for deletions.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5601 Summary: extend --keep-dirlinks to files also Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: hendrik.maryns@uni-tuebingen.de

Hi, A minor bug in the manpage was noticed by a Debian user... (Please keep the 418923-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the Cc list in replies.) diff -u -r1.399 rsync.yo --- rsync.yo 23 Jan 2007 15:34:43 -0000 1.399 +++ rsync.yo 12 Apr 2007 19:30:17 -0000 @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ also ignored. Using this option in conjunction with bf(--relative) may give unexpected results. -dit(bf(-K,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4037 Summary: Rsync should obey --keep-dirlinks when searching basis dirs Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

I'm trying to figure out if there is some way to run an rsync daemon which makes a mix of "real" and symlinked folders available to a client such that all the folders appear as "real" to the client. I realize the --copy-links and --copy-dirlinks accomplish this when invoked from the client side (and that is currently how I am accomplishing this). Is there any way to

It would be nice if rsync offered a way to specify individual dirlinks to keep without keeping all dirlinks. (Unison can do this.) For example, consider the following command: rsync -a --relative src/./ dest/ If rsync refrained from trimming a trailing /. off of source arguments (at least as an option), one could keep a dirlink by passing it as an additional source argument with a /. and

Hi folks, I have a bunch of directories to mirror via rsync. I have lots of hardlinked files spread about these directories. Therfore I use -R (--relative) and -H. so far ok but: I create symlinks to the source-directories via script because src-dirs have changing names (date and time of backup) and I want to have constant directory names on target. How can I achieve that? I thought -k

Hi, I have gone through the rsync documentation and also tested same both --no-implied-dir and --keep-dirlinks options. My question is what is the difference between these options in below scenario? I have /foo/bar is the symlink to /foo/baz at source and same directory structure with symlink is there at destination. When I sync the data from /foo/bar/* with --relative option specified, I am

Hi, We have a website which loads a data file and then create a html file (according to the data file) with more than thousand of combobox at a time (on the same page). The first time we load that page, everything seems fine. all combobox have been created. But when we load a second data file (not the same) the system seems to create some tempoary files which contains the first choice of the

Hi, I just read the thread http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-June/009678.html which describes how --keep-dirlinks came to be. My use case is similar, but I?d like a similar option for files as well. Setup: in my public_html I have some symlinks which I send over as files, with -L (for various reasons: partly, because they are copies of current work which is done elsewhere, or

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:21:03 -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > Just go 1 deeper for your source: rsync -l > ftp.cn.debian.org::debian/dists/wheezy/main/installer-amd64/current/ Yes, I've tried this before. But I also use the `--delete --delete- excluded' with the above options. And finally I found that the current will not be retrieved, in fact it will be deleted at the end. Then I

In VMCore/Module.cpp i found line (254): ((Value*)Ty)->setName(Name, &ST); Type is not Value now and for me this code call llvm::DerivedType::addAbstractTypeUser (I think it have same index in Type VMT in as setName in Value VMT) with random argument values and terminated with assert fail: Assertion failed: (isAbstract() && "addAbstractTypeUser: Current type not

Wayne, Attached is a patch worth of suggested man page improvements for --no-implied-dirs and --keep-dirlinks. I think new users would find my explanations clearer and more complete, although you may want to make additional changes. I regenerated rsync.1 and the patch includes changes to it, but my yodl is somewhat weird, so I suggest you run yodl again yourself. -- Matt McCutchen