Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Rsync hard-links devices with different mtimes despite -t: expected?"
2016 Jul 25
2
[Bug 12036] New: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest flags produce incorrect behavior
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12036
Bug ID: 12036
Summary: Multiple --link-dest, --copy-dest, or --compare-dest
flags produce incorrect behavior
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component:
2008 Feb 16
1
Rsync itemizing "p" even when -p, -E are off
I noticed that rsync itemizes "p" whenever it copies a new file and
finds an alternate basis file whose permissions differ from those to be
applied to the destination file, even when --perms and --executability
are both off. To see this, run the following in an empty directory:
mkdir src dest basis
touch src/file basis/file
chmod 600 src/file
chmod 644 basis/file
rsync -r -ii
2008 Jul 29
7
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5644] New: Option to recheck basis dirs for existing dest files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5644
Summary: Option to recheck basis dirs for existing dest files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2010 Aug 13
26
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7618] New: symlinks and --link-dest
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7618
Summary: symlinks and --link-dest
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: the_majkl at seznam.cz
QAContact:
2019 Mar 07
1
[PATCH] Bug fix for file comparison
Hi,
below you find a patch fixing a bug in the file comparison code: The
current code skips the unchanged_file() check when that check succeeded for
an earlier candidate, which could lead to accepting a file with a different
checksum as unchanged, for example.
Please be aware that the patch is untested.
Florian
diff --git a/generator.c b/generator.c
index a112da6..2df1b28 100644
---
2011 Jun 26
2
does rsync not preserve directory mtimes?
Hi,
I'm running the following command as a local copy command.
faheem at bulldog:/mnt/data$ sudo rsync -abvz --super /data/ .
Origin directory
faheem at bulldog:/data$ ls -la
total 28
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jun 26 08:34 .
drwxr-xr-x 25 root root 4096 Apr 13 17:09 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 owzar001 root 4096 Nov 6 2010 CTS
drwxr-xr-x 2 owzar001 owzar001 4096 Aug 27 2010
2006 Feb 17
3
rsync files with certain mtime
Hello List,
How would i rsync all files which are older than X-Days? I am missing
some kind of -mtime option. Since this is quite common for backups i am
wondering how you are doing this kind of stuff.
Thanks, Mario
2009 Jul 27
3
mtime handling seems generally buggy for directories
Hello again,
as stated earlier there is a problem with mtime setting on directories during
healing in replication setup.
Today I tested 2.0.5 and found out that the handling is more or less generally
buggy for directory mtimes.
Simply try this:
untar some kernel archive on your local disk and look at the mtime of the
created top directory. now untar the same archive on an exported gluster fs
and
2008 Sep 15
5
fixing user, group, and mtime with rsync?
Hi all.
I prepared a mirror (that is intended to be updated by rsync)
by doing the initial copy using cpio (for efficiency on 15 million files).
Unfortunately, user, group, and mtime of some directories and files
was copied incorrectly.
Can I use rsync (GIT) to fix this?
Greetings
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type:
2008 Aug 29
1
maildir, zlib and mtime/internal date
On the wiki:
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Zlib
I think there should be a step 5.0. along the lines of
"get and remember the original message file's mtime"
And a step 5.4 like
"Using the touch command or some other method, set the now compressed
message's mtime back to the mtime of the original message file."
To preserve the message's internal time in case
2008 Nov 09
7
How to delete files older than X on backup during sync?
Hi list,
I have been reading MAN pages and listarchives, but not found the
answer to my question though I am sure it must be possible to acheive
my wish.
I wish to use rsync to create a backup BUT only keep the files for a
limited period of time, EG two weeks.
I have not yet been able to figure out how to do this inside rsync
(while the backup is being performed) and my understanding of the
2007 Nov 16
1
Diff problem
Hi everybody,
Until know i synchronized a few directories full of binaries with
"--checksum" options, it took each time a lot
of time since rsync "mdsum" each file contained in my directories.
Then I decided to skip "--checksum" option to let rsync work only of files
size and files mtime and speed up the process but when i launch
a dry-run : rsync wants to
2017 Apr 13
0
[Bug 12742] New: a proposal: fix bogus nanosecond mtimes on transfer (patch included)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12742
Bug ID: 12742
Summary: a proposal: fix bogus nanosecond mtimes on transfer
(patch included)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: core
2007 Aug 23
4
can rsync scan files only with mtime since T?
Hi
I have a file system that contains millions of small files. Since I
backup it everyday with rsync using slow WAN link, I think it will be
nice that if rsync can do this:
An option that let rsync only check with remote rsync daemon about local
files that has last modification time newer than one day ago (so is
modified since yesterday backup). This can greatly reduce the WAN
traffic.
Is this
2017 Aug 02
1
Fedora bugs and EOL [was Re: CentOS users: please try and provide feedback on Fedora] Boltron
On 08/02/2017 07:36 AM, hw wrote:
>
> Don?t get me started on Fedora updates. One of the reasons to deprecate
> Fedora was that upgrading had turned out to be unreliable and mostly
> failing. Not being able to reliably upgrade disqualifies any
> distribution.
I hate to break it to you, but since they began using fedup and dnf
upgrade, it's never been an issue for me at
2018 Apr 13
3
[Bug 13385] New: rsync sometimes silently transfers more or fewer mtimes than it should
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13385
Bug ID: 13385
Summary: rsync sometimes silently transfers more or fewer
mtimes than it should
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P5
Component: core
2010 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] DCE and external function
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:21 PM, leledumbo <leledumbo_cool at yahoo.co.id> wrote:
>
>> only if the compiler can prove that the called function has
>> no side effects (such as modifying some global variables or
>> causing the program to exit).
>
> can it prove if the function resides in a shared library?
Only if the right function attributes are added. See
2007 Sep 15
5
File changed during save....
hi!
i want to use rsync for backup to central storage.
from emc networker i know some nice feature - it`s telling about "changed
files during save" - i.e. i
know which files have changed their contents while being backed up. for
example you can see if
shutdown of some oracle database was forgotten and that database was backed
up online accidentally.
what`s the rsync equivalent to
2002 Oct 28
3
SMBFS files receiving incorrect timestamps
Hello all.
Our system consists of two linux machines, each running Red Hat 7.1
(kernel 2.4.9-34), using SMB to mount multiple shares hosted by a
Windows 2000 Advance Server. smbclient from Samba 2.2.5 is used to do
the actual mounting.
Over the weekend, a number of files on these SMBFS shares were created
with incorrect timestamps (modification times). In some cases, the
timestamps were off by
2015 Oct 17
2
Order in which UIDs are assigned..
Hi,
I just want some clarification on how Dovecot's IMAP assigns UIDs when
it picks files from the "new" directory of a Maildir. What I am
observing is that only ctime has a role to play in it. For example if
there are two files in "new", a.msg & z.msg. Even when a.msg has lower
mtime than z.msg and "a" comes before "z" alphabetically, dovecot