similar to: rsync hangs when copying directories with --hard-links

Hi all,I need some help. I self compiled rsync 3.0.4 on Mac OSX 10.4 (Tiger)Trying to run the command below...rsync --dry-run -aucvvvX --log-file=fly-dryrun.txt /Volumes/airplane/ /Volumes/plane/flight when running the above command, rsync idles with no action. Anything above 2 v's (-vv), rsync will sit at message below.--------------------------[sender] make_file(\#342\#200\#242Unused

Hi, I tried to build rsync-3.0.0pre4 on a list of different plattforms and got some problems with build or test suite. first, the good news: the build and tests worked fine on these plattforms Solaris 5.5.1, 5.6 and 5.8 (sparc) and 5.10 (x86 and sparc) SUSE Linux 9.0 (amd64), 10.1 (amd6) SLES10 (32 and 64 bit) RedHat 7.1 and 9.0 (32 bit) RedHat EL3 (ia64) problems

Hi! I am newbie at wine and I have one problem. After a successful installation of wine I tried to run some programs - some of them worked properly, but one (the one I need it the most) does not work. This program is a simulator of motorola's 68HC11 assembler. When I try to run it, I get an error: simko@Simkobook:~/c/programs/68hc11/asm11$ wine ASM11.EXE

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It's my understanding that as of 3.0 rsync supports OS X ACLs and extended attributes, and that it should be possible to backup a tree from an OS X system that contains files and folders with ACLs and extended attributes to a Linux host filesystem that has both "user_xattrs" and "acl" enabled on the destination file system.

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre4, the second pre-release version for the upcoming 3.0.0 release. Please keep up the good work in testing this and sending email to the rsync mailing list with your questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks! You can download the tar file and its signature from here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0pre4.tar.gz

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre4, the second pre-release version for the upcoming 3.0.0 release. Please keep up the good work in testing this and sending email to the rsync mailing list with your questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks! You can download the tar file and its signature from here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0pre4.tar.gz

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 Summary: rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links" Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hi, I want to use rsync in a may be unusual way: I have a source tree containing lots of symbolic links and I use the option "--copy-links" to get the physical files (the referents of the symlinks) on the target host. As the host uses the synchronized files in a read-only fashion, I also want to get hardlinks for all identical files, to save space. Thus I also use

This has been niggling me for a while, but am only now getting around to reporting it. I have reproduced the problem with rsync 3.1.0 and nothing in the news file for 3.1.1pre2 looks hopeful... In some filing systems it is possible to have symlinks which are themselves hard linked, i.e. have a link count greater than 1. For example, $ ls -ali /tmp/rsync-in/ total 40 4063036241 drwx------ 2

samba-bugs at samba.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 > > --- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC --- > Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due > to too many hard links. ---------- What would be "too many"? -- a few million? I have files in a test setup that

Ah! Think I figured it out -- it's rtti. When I build with -fno-rtti, the spurious symbol disappears. Blargh, that was complicated. I'm going to try an out-of-source cmake build now. So far this has been a soliloquy, hope it helps someone else. ________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of Charles Jacobsen

I'm using 2.6.3pre1 to transfer a rather large Debian archive (126GB, more than 30 million files). It contains about 450 daily snapshots, where unchanged files are hardlinked between the snapshots (so many files have hunderds of links). It's been running for some time now, and I found that while it's far from done, it's already used 165GB on the receiving end. Investigation shows

I need to add eth0:1 with a new IP address to my C5-based router. Does a design document exist for the ifcfg family of scripts that explains how they're to be used? Before I go digging through the script hierarchy I'm hoping someone can point me to documentation to make the process easier. One confusing issue is that the ifcfg-eth* files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts are

Hello rsync list I've stumbled across a fairly obscure situation in which rsync hangs -- it just waits until I press ctrl-C. Here's a transcript. Note that directory foo contains two small files that are hard-linked together, and are unreadable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $ uname -a Linux ferox 2.6.35-28-generic-pae #50-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar

Hi, I'm using Samba 2:3.5.4 in Ubuntu 10.10. I have setup a folder "dev" locally on my pc, and using "cp -alf" hard linked that folder to folder "test". "test" is currently shared using Samba on the network. When a file in "test" is modified via Samba, the hard link is broken (ie the modified file is unique to folder "test"). This

Hello, Samba seems to simulate NTFS like filesystem, but when we tried to create hard link on UNIX partition, which is supported by NTFS, we failed. Of course, both files resided on the same partition... Can anybody explain me wheither I am wrong? Thank you in advance. Giga.

Hi Tim et al., Yes, I can see that the new behaviour would seem like an 'optimization', possibly especially for large files, in that it saves the unlink operation. was (quasi): unlink, open(write), write data, close now is (quasi): open(write, truncate), write data, close However, this old behaviour enabled my rather nice hard link copy (cheap!) local backup. The question is, is the

Hi All! rsync-3.0.6 with fileflags.diff under FreeBSD 8.0-RC1: if there is a file with uchg or schg flag in source directory and it's hard-linked (usual case for /usr/bin), then rsync cannot create the link in destination directory. Error message: rsync: link "/tmp/s/a" => b failed: Operation not permitted (1) The problem is that it's not allowed to link a *chg'ed file.

I've been getting spurious unnecessary copying of files on OSX when using the crtimes patch and the --crtimes -H options (version 3.0.4). I can reliably demonstrate it (on OSX 10.5) by doing this several times (as root): rsync -v -N -axHAX --delete-during --fileflags --force-change /usr/ bin/ /tmp/foo/ I think I've tracked it down to the hard-link processing code in

Just out of couriosity, (I know OCFS 1 is ONLY for oracle data files) but does it support hard linking? Will OCFS 2? TIA! -- Brian M. Diehl Sr. Network Admin A-1 Limousine Inc. 609-919-2019