similar to: Recommended way for initial backup before rsync calls

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "Recommended way for initial backup before rsync calls"

2007 Aug 02
4
Which rsync version?
Hi all. I once tried to rsync around 100 GB (10 million files), but version 2.6.6 needed too much RAM and was too slow. Is one of the snapshots stable enough to try this again? Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url :
2011 Jun 18
3
Unconditionally transfer files
Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files, i.e. create them anew even if the target already exists and is identical to the source ? rsync -I looks closer but still avoids transferring the files. -- Andr? Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
2008 Sep 15
5
fixing user, group, and mtime with rsync?
Hi all. I prepared a mirror (that is intended to be updated by rsync) by doing the initial copy using cpio (for efficiency on 15 million files). Unfortunately, user, group, and mtime of some directories and files was copied incorrectly. Can I use rsync (GIT) to fix this? Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:
2008 Nov 18
2
Rsync, what are the max transfer limitations ?
What is the maximum transfer rate allowed for rsync? I mean the limitations? I can't get more than 50Mbit speed in my gigabit lan, with rsync server or with ssh. ftp transfers reach >400Mbit , so it is not a lan or nic problem. Maybe it has something to do with my cpu limitations? or the limitations for rsync is the 50Mb/s? Here is my rsyncd.conf if it helps > # by gourgi > max
2006 Aug 08
1
Fitting data with optim or nls--different time scales
Hi, I have a system of ODE's I can solve with lsoda. Model=function(t,x,parms) { #parameter definitions lambda=parms[1]; beta=parms[2]; d = parms[3]; delta = parms[4]; p=parms[5]; c=parms[6] xdot[1] = lambda - (d*x[1])- (beta*x[3]*x[1]) xdot[2] = (beta*x[3]*x[1]) - (delta*x[2]) xdot[3] = (p*x[2]) - (c*x[3]) return(list(xdot)) } I want
2007 Aug 28
2
moderation?
Hi. I get the feeling it's time to turn this list into a moderated one ... Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20070828/aa56db7a/attachment.bin
2007 Aug 22
2
Two Qustions: RSync Server load? Atomic Updates?
Hi, i have a couple of questions I would appreciate if someone could answer... 1) Are there any guidelines for estimating server load? I am going to be running a couple of RSync servers and don't even have an order of magnitude guess as to what kind of load they can handle, how many sessions I should allow at once, etc. The data set I'll be serving is about 7000 files, an update to them
2011 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] How to make Polly ignore some non-affine memory accesses
On 10/07/2011 03:43 PM, Marcello Maggioni wrote: > 2011/10/7 Marcello Maggioni<hayarms at gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> for example this loop: >> >> #include<stdio.h> >> >> int main() >> { >> int A[1024]; >> int j, k=10; >> for (j = 1; j< 1024; j++) >> A[j] =
2006 Oct 09
1
Not fail if can't set permissions ?
I'm adding files to an existing tree via rsync -aO. Some of the directories on the remote are owned by a different user. I have rwx permissions on them but when rsync tries to set the permissions for those directories, it fails and exits with a non-zero status. This is expected but it complicates error detection on my end. Is there a way to make rsync not consider it an error when chmod()
2007 Aug 20
1
Looking inside device files
Is there a way to make rsync look inside device files ? The goal is to copy the contents of a block device to a regular file incrementally. Short of that, even just getting it to dump the block checksums of the content a block device would help (if I know which blocks are out of sync, I can fix them with dd). -- Andr? Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/> Do not use this account
2013 Dec 03
1
Guard against destination = existing directory
Trying to use rsync to make sure that _dest_ is a regular file with the same content as file _source_. If _dest_ already exists and is a symlink, FIFO or device file, rsync deletes it and creates a regular file in its place. Good. If _dest_ already exists and is a directory, rsync creates _dest_/$(basename _source_). Not what I want. Is there an option similar to GNU install -T or GNU cp -T
2005 Oct 31
1
Truncating with decoding/recoding
Hello all. Thanks for FLAC. It's served me well for the past few years. Is there a program out there to truncate a FLAC file without decoding/recoding it ? Preferably command-line (I already know at what point I want to truncate it). Thanks in advance. -- Andr? Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/> Do not use this account for regular correspondence. See the URL above for
2012 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:55 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel > <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a
2012 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Marcus Frenkel <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:55 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel >> <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've a
2011 Oct 07
1
[LLVMdev] How to make Polly ignore some non-affine memory accesses
I add also the output of these commands: [hades at artemis examples]$ ./compile_ex.sh super_simple_loop Printing analysis 'Polly - Detect Scops in functions' for function 'main': [hades at artemis examples]$ modifying it in : #include <stdio.h> int main() { int A[1024]; int j, k=10; for (j = 0; j < 1024; j++) A[j] = k;
2004 Jul 20
1
Proposal: cache directory tagging convention
Hi rsync'ers, I'm soliciting feedback, discussion, and hopefully eventually support for a (currently very short and simple) proposal that would make it easier and more automatic for users to exclude from backups and other data transfers all the cache directories that various applications create and manage, such as Mozilla's web cache. The idea is simple: if applications that
2002 Mar 05
1
oggenc rc3 fails on this one
OggEnc rc3 has trouble with this file. It adds high frequency gunk to the percussive synth part. Lame encodes it fine. http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/misc/nabogg.wav http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/misc/nabogg.ogg -- André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/> std::disclaimer ("Not speaking for my employer"); --- >8 ---- List archives:
2012 Mar 26
4
[LLVMdev] llvm::Type as llvm::Value in metadata
Hi all, I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a subclass of llvm::Value), but llvm::Type is not? Should they not - technically seen - be equal? And to ask a concrete question: is there any way to store a reference to a llvm::Type within the LLVM metadata? As far as I
2012 Feb 16
1
[LLVMdev] Your LLVM email
I believe it's "Dotty", I simply output "opt -view-regions-only". On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Schuster, Vince J <vinces at lanl.gov> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > wrt your llvm email. What do you use to get a visual > display of your .obj file? > > thanks, > Vince Schuster > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 >
2011 May 27
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM teaching materials
I guess even kaleidoscope would serve as a good tutorial -sanjiv On 24 May 2011 17:23, "Tobias Grosser" <grosser at fim.uni-passau.de> wrote: > > On 05/24/2011 05:18 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > > > > On 28.02.2011, at 15:44, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > > >> On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > >>> Hi everyone >