similar to: Which rsync version?

Hi rsync'ers. What can you recommend to create the initial backup of a partition before calling rsync (under Linux, 100 GB, 10M files, only normal files and some soft links)? (Using rsync takes too long for this initial copy.) Here are some candidates: 1. star -copy -no-fsync -p -xdot -C $1 . $2 2. tar -C $1 -cf - . | tar -C $2 -xf - 3. cp -a $1 $2 4. cpio ... ... Any experiences?

Hi all. I prepared a mirror (that is intended to be updated by rsync) by doing the initial copy using cpio (for efficiency on 15 million files). Unfortunately, user, group, and mtime of some directories and files was copied incorrectly. Can I use rsync (GIT) to fix this? Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type:

What is the maximum transfer rate allowed for rsync? I mean the limitations? I can't get more than 50Mbit speed in my gigabit lan, with rsync server or with ssh. ftp transfers reach >400Mbit , so it is not a lan or nic problem. Maybe it has something to do with my cpu limitations? or the limitations for rsync is the 50Mb/s? Here is my rsyncd.conf if it helps > # by gourgi > max

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5701 Summary: deadlock on local rsyncing, bisected to commit f303b749f2843433c9acd8218a4b9096d0d1bb8d Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hi. I get the feeling it's time to turn this list into a moderated one ... Greetings Sven -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20070828/aa56db7a/attachment.bin

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308 Summary: rsync: exclude.c:532: change_local_filter_dir: Assertion `dir_depth < 4096/2+1' failed Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi: I'm in the middle of recoverying from a tactical error copying around an Mac OS X 10.10.5 Time Machine backup (turns out Apple's instructions aren't great...), and I had rsync running for the past 6 hours repairing permissions/acls on 1.5 TB of data (not copying the data), and then it just died in the middle with: .L....og.... 2015-03-11-094807/platinum-bar2/usr/local/mysql

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:55 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel > <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a

Hello, I'm running HP-UX 11i on an rp74xx. It's 64-bit. C compiler is as follows: B3901BA B.11.11.03 HP C/ANSI C Developer's Bundle for HP-UX 11.i (S800) B3913DB C.03.30.02 HP aC++ Compiler (S800) /usr/bin/cc: LINT B.11.11.02 CXREF B.11.11.02 HP92453-01 B.11.11.02 HP C Compiler $ Sep 8 2000 23:13:51 $ I have successfully compiled rsync 2.6.2 and it

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Marcus Frenkel <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:55 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel >> <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've a

Hi all, I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a subclass of llvm::Value), but llvm::Type is not? Should they not - technically seen - be equal? And to ask a concrete question: is there any way to store a reference to a llvm::Type within the LLVM metadata? As far as I

Matt McCutchen wrote: > On 8/4/07, Rekrutacja <rekrutacja119@gmail.com> wrote: >> i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors: >> >> *** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: >> 0x0d757d58 *** > > This looks like the same problem Sven Hartrumpf recently encountered > and described in this thread: >

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Marcus Frenkel <marcus.frenkel at fernuni-hagen.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've a question about something that's bothering me for quite some time now: why is a llvm::Function seen as a llvm::Value (in a sense that llvm::Function is a subclass of llvm::Value), but llvm::Type is not? Should they not - technically seen - be equal? llvm::Function

Somebody made it possible to use DirectShow video codecs in OGG framework... Now get ready for DivX OGG files :) <http://www.stud.fernuni-hagen.de/q5045045/> -- Jernej Simoncic, jernej.simoncic@guest.arnes.si http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/ ICQ: 26266467 The intelligence of any discussion diminishes with the square of the number of participants. -- Walinsky's Law

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11166 Bug ID: 11166 Summary: running with -vvv causes a hang Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: pskocik at

Wayne, Please consider the attached patch. This applies to the current CVS, and is independant of patches/local-batch.diff. As a matter of fact, I'm sure it would conflict heavily with local-batch.diff. This version of batch mode has a couple distinguishing features: Write-batch records (almost) the entire sender side of the conversation into one file. ("Almost" because it has

Greetings, I'm developing a FUSE-based file system which will be exported to the Windows-world via Samba. My file system is emulating NTFS Alternate Data Streams by creating the content of those files "on the fly" on access. This works quite well with Samba 3.4.6 and the ":Zone.Identifier" stream. But the Windows clients don't even try to access the

Hi, I stumbled upon a strange thing regarding types and module linking, which I don't quite get, so maybe someone around here can enlighten me. Consider the following code, which will create 2 modules m1 and m2, and a named structured type %T = { i32 }; m1 contains only a function definition f(%T), m2 contains a function declaration f(%T) and a function definition h(%T), where h will call f

i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors: *** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x0d757d58 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x1bb)[0xb7eeffeb] rsync[0x807f2f0] rsync[0x804bc22] rsync[0x8056a5d] rsync[0x8056e83] rsync[0x806101a] rsync[0x8061869] rsync[0x8062bf8] rsync[0x8077fef] rsync[0x80623a6]

I've tripped over this behaviour as well. I ended up working around the problem by creating a new context every time I wanted to link modules together. Which led to me accidently generating one module using two different contexts. Which isn't an error that is detected by module verification. It only causes issues for comparisons like Type equality that compare pointers, and those types of