similar to: (Rsync 3.0) acls for OS X

Version 3.0.0cvs protocol version 30.PR4 Capabilities: 64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, no ACLs, xattrs, iconv The exclude test fails on OS X Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.1 RELEASE_I386. It just hangs there until CTL-C. The same test passes on the G4 PPC Darwin 8.10.0, and on i686 Xeon

Wayne, I am concerned that, when you decide to release rsync 3.0.0, one or more hanging bugs may remain in the incremental recursion code. My rationale is as follows. At least four such bugs have been found so far, and I see no evidence that those are all there are. Furthermore, from April 27 to July 10, about 2.5 months passed without any hanging bugs being found; then, on July 11, Warren

I compiled 3.0.6pre1, including the crtimes and fileflags patches for use on Intel OS X 10.5.6, as described by Mr. Bombich (thanks!) here: <http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html> I want to use 3.0.6 because it seems that this bug: <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365> has been resolved (yay!). ----- [~]$ rsync --version rsync version 3.0.6pre1 protocol version 30

I too have the same issue (reported by Warren) - in that 3.06 backups appear valid, but the terminal shows the following errors: rsync(18819) malloc: *** error for object 0xf305c: Non-aligned pointer being freed *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug I'm looking for confirmation that these are simply anomalies, and indeed are not cause for concern. Thanks.

Are there any patches (or planned updates) to rsync v3.0.6 to handle the HFS+ File Compression that Apple introduced with Snow Leopard?

Looking for more efficient replication or synchronization solution than rsync, take a look at syncdat by www.dataexpedition.com Mike -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

i've built up rsync on both opensuse & osx from src. on osx, it's v2.6.3 w/ both apple's "Extended Attributes" patches: http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.8.ppc/rsync-24/patches/EA.diff http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.4.8.ppc/rsync-24/patches/PR-3945747-endian.diff and the 'lartmaker' fix (iteself, slightly fixed ...):

Hi All, I have been using rysnc 3.0.6 with Mike's rsync_3.0.6-hfs-compression_20091027.diff patch (as well as the standard osx patches) with good results. I discovered that clones done on 10.6 using this rsync cause some executable files ( the ones that are mostly compressed this way on osx ) to be damaged. I did a test twice and indeed a handful of them are damaged. They all appear to be in

Hi. Several months ago, I posted my first pass at a patch to transfer Mac OS X HFS+ metadata (resource forks and Finder metadata) to non-HFS+ filesystems (Linux, Solaris, etc). I finally got a chance to update the patch to reflect suggestions offered on the list. Thanks for the ideas, this version should be a big improvement. The diff and a binary (and a fuller explanation) can be found at:

rsync is a very useful tool for me to backup from Max OS X to a linux server. However, would developers please add one feature: When rsync runs on an OS X machine and the source files are in hfs+ (or hfs) filesystem, copy the resources fork to a file with filename starts with a dot and append the original filename. That's the current behaviour of samba client on OS X interacting with

I'm trying to use rsync to backup some database files on a Linux box to an OS X machine, so I can write them to a tape drive connected to the OS X machine. I'm aware that there are some "issues" about rsync and certain file forks found on HFS+ filesystems, but I'm not sure that should be stopping me from accomplishing what I want to do. I'm using rsync 2.5.5 on both

Hi, I tried using rsyncX which is a GUI front end for rsync and as it turns out, the installer downgraded the current version from version 2.6.3 protocol version 28 to version 2.6.6 protocol version 27. I would like to learn more about how to get a newer version of rsync installed. Where would be a good place for a beginner to start? Thanks Much, Scott G.

Hello group, I am working on a test installation of Samba 3.0.10 on FreeBSD 5.3 as potential solution to some of our current file server problems. One of the main ones being good 'ole Win2000 Services for Macintosh - which we would like to dump completely. Here's the situation. We have a handful of Mac machines, all recently taken to 10.3.7 (10.3.8 upgrade is pending) which currently

As you all know, rsync doesn't have any special handling for Mac OS X HFS+ resource forks. Kevin Boyd made RsyncX and rsync_hfs, to address this gap, but they only work when the destination filesystem is also HFS+. I haven't been able to find any references to an rsync that is capable of syncing from HFS+ to UFS (etc). The only solutions I've seen involve lots of preprocessing

Hi, I'm trying to make a small script to get rid of Apple's TimeMachine. The aim is to backup the files of my company. I setup a MacMini with a lot of storage attached to it. The MacMini connects every once in a while to our data server (XServe) through SSH and pulls the files that need to be saved (I'm using the --link-dest option to limit the amount of files transferred, and to keep

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7685 Summary: rsync should not set the creation data on the root folder of an HFS+ volume Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

OpenSSH Unix Dev, Mac OS X 10.5 recently shipped with OpenSSH 4.5p1. This build includes a number of patches, some general bug fixes and some platform- specific fixes and enhancements. These patches are available from our open source site (http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5/OpenSSH-87/ ). Following is a brief description of each patch. We'd be more than happy to

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Jul 2, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: >> >>> On 07/01/2015 05:10 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>>> >>>> Nope. CentOS 5, 6 and 7 all support dual-boot. >> >> Considering CentOS 7, at least, doesn't include ntfsprogs,

[Now the horse has left the barn, I decided to finally implement that backup system I'd been thinking about for ages. Disk crashes can be great motivators] [Web-location for the living version of this document: http://www.lartmaker.nl/rsync/] Goal: Producing a working network backup / cloning system for Mac OS X systems. The system can be used for local backups as well, for example to

Hi all. Here's my situation with this error. I'm running Mac OS X 10.2. I connect to two servers: one running Win2000 Server (sp3), the other running Linux with Samba 2.2.6. The shared volume on the Linux box is an ext3 volume. I'm connecting to both of them using DAVE v4. I can copy files to the Win2000 server just fine. Most of the time everything works great with the Samba