similar to: Autoreply from registration@cgta.org [Re: test ]

Steve Sills Platnum Computers, President http://www.platnum.com steve@platnum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sills" <steve@platnum.com> To: "jw schultz" <jw@pegasys.ws> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Rsync's Speed > The source server is a Dual 800 Mhz /w a 7200 RPM 40 GB HDD, the dest server > is a P III 450 with a

Sent from BlackBerry? on Airtel -----Original Message----- From: rsync-request@lists.samba.org Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:00:33 To:rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: rsync Digest, Vol 58, Issue 29 Send rsync mailing list submissions to rsync@lists.samba.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync or, via email, send a message with

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just > letting rsync re-copy everything Depends on the network capacity and costs associated with that bandwidth :( >and therefore is almost always the > wrong thing to do. Nope,

> On 25 May 2020, at 23:55, Wayne Davison via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I've decided to give hosting it on github a try, especially since there's been a lot of nice contributions lately. Hopefully this will make it easier for both the people sending patches as well as for me to snag the changes. I'll continue to push changes to the samba git as well.

problem is he's trying to rsync into the target dir and have the side effect of delete. so an empty dir would necessarily need to be in the target of course and thus created there, triggering the quota block. he tried to avoid this by using device files then 'blocking all device files' but i think rsync figures out first there's nothing to do, so it just stops and doesnt do the

Thanks Fabi, et all, I will follow up with your suggestion using ssh for renaming the directories after rsync. I appreciate the help. Freddie On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 4:00 AM <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Hi Ram, In OS X, some font types (not all) put the font payload in the resource fork. Netatalk provides AFP filesharing, imitating the resource forks by creating secondary files in ?.Appledouble? folders within each folder. Netatalk tracks the resource forks, and other metadata, by keeping a ?Desktop database? at the root of the shared volume ? look for .AppleDesktop, and .AppleDB. You can

Hi raf, Curious issue you have. A few things: What distro(s) are you using? Same rsync version on both ends? Hash of files look correct before and after the rsync? Have you tried using inotify to monitor for changes at the fs level? You should see a "read" on the sender and a "read" + "write" on the receiver. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 11:25 PM raf via rsync

I have a Samba 3 server that is trying to sync with itself. I have wins support = yes in the samba configuration file and there are no other WINS servers on the network. The IP address of the Samba server is 192.168.10.4 and is trying to sync with itself but fails... Here's the error from log.nmbd [2005/08/10 12:34:21, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)

Inspired by AG Projects' Adrian Georgescu's post of Eric S. Raymond's classic "How to Ask Questions the Smart Way" to the OpenSIPS-users mailing list[1], I'm going to repost it here: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html As Adrian said, "This a good read for those who show up on mailing lists without any guidance about how to ask the right

I have it up and working. for me at least. http://crypotworksapps.blogspot.com/2011/04/windows-and-linux-backups-made-dirt.html On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00 AM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ? ? ?

This sounds like a job for Relax and Recover: http://relax-and-recover.org/ Cal Sawyer | Systems Engineer | BlueBolt On 19/07/15 13:00, rsync-request at lists.samba.org wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > or, via email, send

I THINK YOUR A VERY SAD BUNCH OF LIFES WAISTERS On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:00 PM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ? ? ? ?https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync > or, via email, send a message with subject or body

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 if you see >f it is doing something to the file. At least a delta-xfer. If it was just a metadata change it would show cf. If you see an >fc without a t then that is an example where rsync found a file that didn't match even though the timestamps did. That isn't supposed to happen very often. On 10/28/2015 01:19 PM, Clint Olsen

Hi-- Ok. I?ve now run into the next thing I can?t find in man, and this time, I googled as well: --exclude /afs/\* I thought you could just say: --exclude /afs/* or even --exclude /afs/ To exclude the entire afs directory. Can you explain what the purpose of the \ and * are here? Thanks again :) All My Best, Jeffrey on 8/6/06 5:00 AM, rsync-request@lists.samba.org at

Exit code 2 is "Protocol incompatibility". Also, sounds like what you really want is --files-from On 04/07/2017 10:01 AM, Axel Kittenberger via rsync wrote: > With this two options on a very live system you may need to take into > account this bug as well I reported a while ago: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569 > > Due to this I'm currently

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 No, even if bandwidth is your concern I would say that --checksum is wrong. Maybe if bandwidth is so scarse that a few KB vs a few MB equates to dollars then sure, use --checksum. Otherwise, letting rsync re-delta-xfer everything is certainly faster and not much more bandwidth intensive than --checksum. Plus that is only if you screwed up and ran

Anyone have any other ideas I could try to debug this issue? :) -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 16:02 GMT+01:00 Aron Rotteveel <rotteveel.aron at gmail.com>: > Hi Kevin, > > Just did: same result. > > -- > Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, > > Aron Rotteveel > > 2015-03-27 14:32 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at

Not to mention the fact that ZFS requires considerable hardware resources (CPU & memory) to perform well. It also requires you to learn a whole new terminology to wrap your head around it. It's certainly not a trivial swap to say the least... Thanks, -Clint On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Ken Chase <rsync-list-m829 at sizone.org> wrote: > This has been a consideration. But it