similar to: Preventing non-root users from transferring root owned files

To whom it may concern, I have a question referring to the calculation of variance estimation of the survey package I need to estimate the variance for different Domains but for a stratified sampling desing in several stages. Särndal et al (1992), CAP 10, makes reference to this problem. My question is if it is possible by means of "survey package" to obtain these

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:34:21PM +0200, NoxDaFox wrote: > Greetings, > > I have the following typical scenario: given one or more qcow2 base images > I clone them with COW and start the VMs. > > At a certain point I'd like to inspect them in order to see their evolution > compared to the known base images. To do so I was thinking about taking a > disk snapshot of

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:41:01PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:34:21PM +0200, NoxDaFox wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have the following typical scenario: given one or more qcow2 base images > > I clone them with COW and start the VMs. > > > > At a certain point I'd like to inspect them in order to see their evolution

Do not error out on empty files, just ignore them. --- src/mode_build.ml | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/mode_build.ml b/src/mode_build.ml index b5f5fa6..9cd0a21 100644 --- a/src/mode_build.ml +++ b/src/mode_build.ml @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ and file_content = | Packages | Hostfiles | Excludefiles +| Empty let rec string_of_file_type = function |

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:30PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: [. . .] > > This makes a copy of the whole disk image. It's also not a consistent > > (point in time) copy. > > Oh I see that you're copying the _snapshot_ that you created with > libvirt; it's not a whole disk copy. There's still not any point in > doing this, and what I said below

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:32:19PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Do not error out on empty files, just ignore them. > --- > src/mode_build.ml | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/mode_build.ml b/src/mode_build.ml > index b5f5fa6..9cd0a21 100644 > --- a/src/mode_build.ml > +++ b/src/mode_build.ml > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ and

I am running below command to connect puppet master puppet agent --certname testcertname --no-daemonize --onetime --server server_host_name --verbose it outputs error like: Error: Execution of ''/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install dnsmasq'' returned 1: Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: base Could not retrieve mirrorlist

I was sure I was doing something wrong as I'm not yet fully aware of QCOW2 snapshot feature and how it interacts with libguestfs. I'll try to explain better the scenario: I have several hosts running lots of VMs which are generated from few base images, say A, B, C the base images (backing file) and A1, A2, A*, B1, B2, B* clones on top of which the newly spawned VMs are running. I need

Hi Team, I am just a curious individual user who reviewed the OpenSSH;not working for a company. I was just wondering why there is a restriction for chroot directory to be owned by root. The line of code below in session.c show them. The basic UNIX security permissions provide a sufficient access control. Have you guys found a way to bypass security if the directory is not owned by root? -

Dear I encounter this error on Samba 3.0.28a, i would like to know how to fix it, The file is owned by root, i don't understand whats going wrong... smbd[15232]: [2011/02/18 16:32:22, 0] param/loadparm.c:load_usershare_shares(4878) Feb 18 16:32:22 virtualbox smbd[15232]: load_usershare_shares: directory /var/lib/samba/usershares/data is not owned by root or does not have the sticky bit

Hi, I installed 3.0.2p1 on our Solaris 8 systems this week (new to ssh), and when I look at the process list for sshd, I see: root 14547 1 0 10:35:29 ? 0:00 /opt/openssh/sbin/sshd root 14548 14547 0 10:35:36 ? 0:01 /opt/openssh/sbin/sshd Process 14547 is the deamon listening on port 22, but process 14548 is my connection from elsewhere. I consider it a design

G'day I am having an interesting issue, that I can not find a fixe for. I am running dovecot 1.0 rc7, on a Freebsd 5.4 x86 box, with around 1500ish users, using Maildir storage format. I have a very small number of user, with the same problem, when messages are moved from ~username/Maildir/new to ~username/Maildir/cur a random number, of the files ownership, will change to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm experiencing an odd situation on my samba (3.0.9) server (RH 7.3). maybe it is normal, but I prefer to ask... Some smbd processes are not owned by the corresponding user, but by root instead : [root@karma logs]# ps faxu|grep smbd|grep ^root|wc -l 213 [root@karma logs]# ps faxu|grep smbd|grep -v ^root|wc -l 29 but samba view

I just tried to mount Windows 2003 share. I used the following command to mount it: mount.cifs //10.1.1.1/G$ /mnt/2003/ -o user=admin,domain=MYDOMAIN The mount is fine, I can read the files. However, each and every file is owned by root, which is not true. Moreover, each and every file and folder has the same permissions, which is also not true. I can change the owners and permissions, but

I mount another Linux machine with: smbmount tillie/all /mnt/tillie -o uid=0 Trying to copy a root owned to file after either su or su - fails with: cp: cannot create regular file `/mnt/tillie/usr/local/bin/smbmt': Permission denied Since I have root priviledges why does this happen? The file perms are: -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 4.6K 2006-05-02 16:58 smbmt I get the following message on

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 07:38:03PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:30PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > [. . .] > > > > This makes a copy of the whole disk image. It's also not a consistent > > > (point in time) copy. > > > > Oh I see that you're copying the _snapshot_ that you created with > >

Hi there, I just found that if an user is assigned in the "admin users", and if the user grab a file from window to samba share, the file will be owned by root from unix view. I am believing this is a bug. The samba version I am using is 2.2.4. Weixing Hao (631) 858-6341 Forest Labs -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Greetings all, After running for more than a year without issue on debian lenny while it was in the testing- we're now experiencing problems under Lenny/Stable. Dovecot now converts some sort of lockfile into messages, and they're owned by root. The result is a mess; clients can't read their mailboxes with the root-owned files, and when the file is changed to be owned by them, many

Hi all. We have been denying NFS access to our Linux et al users since they can of course set their uid to whatever they want. So we tell them to use smbfs. But when I just tried experimenting by mounting my own network share on my Linux box via smbfs, and created a few files, I loo on the serevr and the files are all owned by root?! This has got to be a configuration issue right? -- Mark E

I''m trying to start a number of lvm-backend domUs on a Dell Poweredge 2850 (i''ve got nousb on the grub command line, and no usb in the kernel). Some domUs are created and started successfully. However, quite a few of my domUs don''t start properly. I get the correct Started Domain messages... but then the domain doesn''t "go anywhere", meaning