similar to: Difference between 'DEST' & '--backup-dir='?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Difference between 'DEST' & '--backup-dir='?"

2015 Jul 15
0
Rsync creates empty directories with backup-dir option
With rsync 3.1.1 (on debian), using the "backup-dir" option creates a tree of empty folders inside the backup repository. This doesn't affect the transfer (all files and folder are copied anyway). Example: ---- rsync -rtvhPx --delete --stats --exclude-from=/home/pierre/scripts/ExclusionRSync --backup --backup-dir=/media/pierre/g2/sauvegardes/fichiers_supprimes_pierre
2004 Aug 06
1
ices2 compilation problem
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, I can't compile ices2 from cvs.xiph.org OS Linux gcc 2.95 I get this error: make[2]: Entre dans le répertoire `/usr/local/src/ices/src' gcc -DPACKAGE=\"ices\" -DVERSION=\"2.0\" -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 - -I. -I. -Inet -Ithread -Iavl -Ilog -Itiming -DHAVE_OSS -O20 -ffast-math - -fsigned-char
2015 Apr 17
1
Recycling directories and backup performance. Was: Re: rsync --link-dest won't link even if existing file is out of date (fwd)
How do you handle snapshotting? or do you leave that to the block/fs virtualization layer? /kc On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:35:27PM +1200, Henri Shustak said: >> Our backup procudures have provision for looking back at previous directories, but there is not much to be gained with recycled directories. Without recycling, and after a failure, the latest available backup may not have much
2007 Jan 29
0
Question on --backup --backup-dir Switches For Incremental Ba cks
take a look at rsnapshot http://www.rsnapshot.org/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Blake Carver [mailto:lists@lisnews.com] > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:35 AM > To: rsync@lists.samba.org > Subject: Question on --backup --backup-dir Switches For Incremental > Backs > > > I current do some rsync backups with a command like so every day > > rsync -az
2007 Nov 11
0
Recent French communications
Hello All, (Salut) Sebastien is a French user among us, and doesn''t speak English, so I''ve been talking with him in French the best way I know how (Google is god.) So, I will also translate the conversation going on, so that everyone will be able to understand, and keep up with what has been going on: (Sebastien est un utilisateur français parmi nous, et ne parle pas
2008 Sep 10
1
Xen-3.3 Etch amd64 compil error
Hello user-list, Here is my pb : I have a brand new debian Etch with all updates installed on a DELL PE SC430 with a Pentium D 930 (3Ghz, Intel-VT, EMT64) I''ve downloaded xen-3.3 and tried to install with /*"The Perfect Xen 3.1.0 Setup For Debian Etch" */howto. But when i run the the "make world" I have an error with the studbom compilation : /Dans le fichier
2015 Apr 06
0
rsync --link-dest won't link even if existing file is out of date
Not to mention the fact that ZFS requires considerable hardware resources (CPU & memory) to perform well. It also requires you to learn a whole new terminology to wrap your head around it. It's certainly not a trivial swap to say the least... Thanks, -Clint On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Ken Chase <rsync-list-m829 at sizone.org> wrote: > This has been a consideration. But it
2016 Feb 04
1
Is there a parameter in rsync to clean $BACKUPDIR before writing to it (--backup-dir=$BACKUPDIR)?
Hi Kevin, Thank you very much for the response. Actually, I don't think I need to clean the backup dir defined in --backup-dir=<backup dir>, when the contents has already been deleted in the destination (no exist), it will delete from the backup dir as well in next cycle, correct? Regards, - j On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: >
2018 Mar 05
1
file contents cause rsync to fail (with certains args and dir structure)
Problem was introduced with this commit: commit f3873b3d88b61167b106e7b9227a20147f8f6197 Author: Wayne Davison &lt;wayned at samba.org&gt; Date: Mon Oct 10 11:49:50 2016 -0700 Support --sparse combined with --preallocate or --inplace. The new code tries to punch holes in the destination file using newer Linux fallocate features. It also supports a --whole-file
2002 Jun 07
1
rsync option
Approximated petitioner: Perhaps this will help. SunOS 5.7 Last change: 25 Jan 2002 5 User Commands rsync(1) -C, --cvs-exclude auto ignore files in the same way CVS does --existing only update files that already exist --ignore-existing ignore files that already exist
2003 May 14
1
remote rsyncd modules and --link-dest
Can anyone shed any light on what I should expect from rsync when the --link-dest option is invoked when the destination is a remote rsync module? i.e. rsync --archive --delete --link-dest=../dst_1/ /src/ user@host::xyz/dst_0 I almost expected to get a whole lot of hard links in dst_1 to unchanged files in dst_0... if I skip rsyncd on the server side (i.e. make the target
2016 Feb 08
0
--link-dest not working on remote server (running daemon)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 try: --link-dest=../backup-2016-02-01-0100 On 02/08/2016 04:51 PM, Sam Holton wrote: > Thanks for the reply. The link-dest is different. It is Feb 1 while > the source is Feb 2. > > I tried setting path = /media/external/ for the daemon and using > > rsync -a -v -i --delete --link-dest=backup-2016-02-01-0100 >
2015 Jul 14
1
rsync --link-dest and --files-from lead by a "change list" from some file system audit tool (Was: Re: cut-off time for rsync ?)
And what's performance like? I've heard lots of COW systems performance drops through the floor when there's many snapshots. /kc On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:59:25AM +0200, Paul Slootman said: >On Mon 13 Jul 2015, Andrew Gideon wrote: >> >> On the other hand, I do confess that I am sometimes miffed at the waste >> involved in a small change to a very
2019 Jan 08
2
--link-dest. Time to 'building file list' incrementing
Any ideas anyone? I still need at least a weekly backup of all data. The current workaround is just for the most active directories. Are there any diagnostics I can do which might shed some light on this? Thanks JohnOn 4 Jan 2019 09:53, John Simpson via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Kevin > > The link-dest parameter is a single directory (the previous day's
2011 Mar 04
1
Time series analysis for a daily series
Hi everyone I am trying to do some time series analysis with daily temperature data (40 years). I have created a zoo object and ts object but can't apply stl function. It says the series is not periodic or has less than two periods. I've searched through google and found a lot of messages about this problem but not a solution/example to look for trend and seasonal component of a
2019 Jan 04
0
--link-dest. Time to 'building file list' incrementing
Kevin The link-dest parameter is a single directory (the previous day's directory), the destination is today's directory. I haven't tried deleting a backup, there's no particular need in space terms, at the current rate there's enough space for several years of daily backups. I've reverted to daily backups on a small subset of the total; the full backup now takes
2011 Feb 17
2
Regresión lineal para una serie temporal
Hola a todos Estoy intentando hacer un análisis rápido de una serie temporal de datos diarios pero me encuentro con algunos problemas. Me gustaría en primera instancia hacer una regresión lineal pero no encuentro la forma. Tras leer los datos diarios creo un objeto de la clase zoo y sobre éste no puedo utilizar lm(). He leído algo sobre dynlm pero no encuentro la forma. Se agradece
2007 Sep 12
1
Verifying understanding of backup-dir vs compare-dest
Hello, Say one starts with creating an archive rsync work -> archive and periodically (below, i = 1 to N) does rsync --backup-dir=a_<i> work -> archive and rsync --compare-dest=archive work -> b_<i> Then suppose one wants to recover the work directory as it was at time k. Using the b_<i> directories, one would merely merge
2007 Oct 15
1
--backup-dir or --link-dest?
Hi, To do incremental backups I am presently using --backup-dir=/backup/host/$TODAY and the full backup is written to /backup/host/current. With this system incremental directories only contain deleted files and "current" contains the full backup. Would it be more efficient to use --link-dest=/backup/host/$YESTERDAY and write the main backup to /backup/host/$TODAY ? That way each
2008 Apr 01
12
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5365] New: --backup and --xattrs are not compatible
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365 Summary: --backup and --xattrs are not compatible Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: fauthier@free.fr