Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "parallel tree recursion"
2007 Mar 07
1
syncronizing file content into device content
I have repeatable cases where a (very large) file contents are the
intended content of a device (partition) of that exact size. The
target device is already mostly of that content, but a few block
have been changed. I want to restore the device contents back to
what the file originally was. I'm trying to find a way to have
rsync's write end open the device as a file and do its thing to
2004 Aug 07
1
multiple instances of NSD
I'm trying to set up a machine which will be running multiple instances
of NSD to serve different sets of zones from different interfaces. What
I'm running into is that I can't specify different PID files to refer to
on the command line.
Are there any shortcuts or do I need to go write a patch?
Any other implications of multiple instances?
--
2005 Nov 27
2
trying to understand --include and --exclude
I was under the impression that --include and --exclude worked by matching
patterns in the order given, and whichever matched first, whether that was
an include or exclude determined the action for that file. I have a big
directory from which I am attempting to transfer selected files. I want
all files where the first level directory is anything, the second level
directory is "2005"
2004 Jan 03
1
rsync 2.6.0: ./configure goes into a loop
After doing a fresh extraction of the source for 2.6.0, I execute ./configure
and it enters a loop with no output before or during. I let run 20 minutes
just to see if it would ever do anything and it did nothing else.
Host system has:
Linux: 2.4.23
Slakcware: 9.0
bash: 2.05b.0
gcc: 3.2.2
glibc: 2.3.1
I have a big (huge) strace of it here:
2007 Feb 04
2
klibc 1.4 won't build with linux 2.6.19.1
I get this error:
=============================================================================
KLIBCCC usr/kinit/resume.o
usr/kinit/resume.c:15:66: linux/config.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [usr/kinit/resume.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make: *** [klibc] Error 2
=============================================================================
There is no linux/config.h in
2003 Sep 16
1
SIGHUP fails to restart (3.6.1p2 -> 3.7p1)
I have the sshd daemon located at /sbin/ssh_22 in this scenario (because I have
more than one daemon with separate executable images). After upgrading from
3.6.1p2 to 3.7p1, with the /sbin/ssh_22 copy replaced by mv (not by writing
over the existing image), I do SIGHUP and get this message logged:
Sep 16 15:07:36 vega sshd_22[22552]: Received SIGHUP; restarting.
Sep 16 15:07:36 vega
2004 Apr 03
1
rsync is slowing down
The cause is, of course, that the tree being syncronized ie getting larger,
so of course rsync is slowing down. But in the case of my particular file
tree, there is a way it could be speeded up, but this would obviously also
need a change in the rsync protocol to accomplish it. Any tree that has
major unchanged subbranches would benefit from this.
The file tree I'm syncronizing in this case
2007 Feb 04
1
Instructions for using klibc
Now that I got klibc to build, the next step is to leanr what it takes to
compile ... and most importantly, link ... a program with klibc. Past
experience with the GNU toolchain tells me GCC will be a bit of a trouble
maker in this, probably trying to make inappropriate library references
that would work fine with glibc. I do not currently have any intent to
make shared/dynamically linked
2002 Mar 08
1
delete fails to delete everything it should like dangling symlinks
I think someone posted this before, but I can't find it in the archives.
I am using rsync to pull down source files to be compiled. The delete
options are used to clear out any old files left over from previous.
Normally this works. I've run into one case where it persistently fails.
Within the directory created during compiling is a symlink to another
directory, also created during
2002 Aug 22
2
rsync over ssl (again)
A while back, I asked if there had been any consideration in making
rsync support direct ssl (as opposed to just ssh). I've been looking
around for a secure way (e.g. encrypted, so passwords are never in
the clear, and even content is obscured from sniffers) to allow a
set of limited-trust users (limited-trust being defined as mostly
customers, whom you trust with their own data, but not with
2004 Mar 27
1
--include vs. --exclude
It guess I still haven't figured out the entire sematics of the --include
and --exclude options. From reading the man page, it seems to say that
what happens is that each file being checked is tested against each pattern
in order, and when one matches the tests end, and whether it is --include
or --exclude determines if that file is included or excluded.
So I have on my server a big file
2002 Jan 27
3
option --delete still not completely working (2.5.2)
This problem has persisted for as long as I've used rsync. When
the --delete option is used, not all files are deleted from the
target, even though said files are not present in the source.
The particular cases that cause this are when the target has a
directory with files, and the source is something else, at least
a symlink (this is the case I have seen). I'm taking a guess to
say that
2001 Sep 14
1
rsync transfers of data from Windows to Unix
Are there any clients and/or servers for Windows (clients only
for Win98/ME) which can use the rsync protocol, or especially
rsync over SSL (e.g. like stunnel, not ssh), which would allow
setting up some well controlled and secure bulk file exchanging
between Windows an Unix? SMB is not going to be an option and
a VPN may not be an option, either (there are technical reasons
for that but they are
2002 May 19
1
exclude vs include
My understanding of the man page description of --exclude vs. --include
is that the list of these is kept in order, and file names are searched
against these parameters in that order for the first that matches and
that one makes the decision. It doesn't seem to be working exactly as
expected. But there is a factor involved that's making it unclear,
which is whether or not *'s should
2002 Jun 26
2
why fd passing?
If I understand privsep correctly, and I'm not sure I do as there
are some ambiguities in the illustration of what processes are
doing what, there is a way to avoid doing fd passing. What I see
is that fd passing is done to send the PTY to the user privileged
process after the monitor process was requested to set one up.
Why not go ahead and have the monitor set one up before it forks
the
2003 Jun 23
1
any way to get --one-file-system in rsyncd.conf?
I would like to specify an entry in /etc/rsyncd.conf such that it
operates on a --one-file-system basis always. The path will point
to a filesystem mount point, but there is another filesystem that
is mounted in a subdirectory. I want to back up only those files
in the pointed to filesystem, and not the one mounted within (in
that run, anyway). I do not see such an option in man rsyncd.conf.
Is
2000 Jul 23
0
close then select of stderr fd in client (openssh)
Under certain circumstances (repeatable with a workaround) the client in
openssh-2.1.1p3 and p4 closes file descriptors and then calls select()
with the stderr one in the write fd_set. The circumstances which cause
this appears to be that the closing of stdin/stdout/stderr occurs before
the last of the stderr data is written to stderr.
This occurs when a tty is not allocated, but the error
2002 Jun 26
1
�����M�~�W���q������-- �����q
[garbage in Chinese snipped]
Is there any way to set up a post-confirmation system for non-subscribers
so that their posts do not get distributed unless they confirm first?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
| phil-nospam at ipal.net | Texas, USA | http://phil.ipal.org/ |
2001 Sep 14
1
rsync and SSL
I'm finding even less on rsync and SSL. I would have imagined someone
would have done something with this already, but apparently not. So
I guess I need to ask and see for sure: has anyone worked on issues of
using rsync via SSL, such as with stunnel? I want to have encrypted
access, either anonymous or authenticated, but without granting any SSH
access to anyone (e.g. the rsync
2002 Mar 08
1
building openssh executeables mostly statically
Is there a configure option to build OpenSSH mostly statically?
I want to have openssl libraries statically linked. I'd prefer
libc (and related) not be, and libz could go either way.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard - KA9WGN | Dallas | http://linuxhomepage.com/ |
| phil-nospam at ipal.net | Texas, USA | http://phil.ipal.org/ |