similar to: Rsync and permissions - rsync version 2.6.4 protocol version 29

I have a basic directory structure that I want to be able to copy in one of two ways. The base structure is /a/b/c under that structure I have /d/e and finally files 'f'. I create a list of the /d/e/f files and put them in a file and then use: rsync -auvP /a/b/c --files-from=myFileList targetBaseDir That works fine and I end up with /targetBaseDir/d/e/f Now what I also want to do is

Hi, I'm rotating my PGP keys, so this is a forewarning that the key used to sign the next release of portable OpenSSH will be different to the one I've used in the past. Hopefully the gnupg incantations that I recited have resulted in a new key that is correctly cross-signed by my old one so there should be a trust path across the rollover. The new key is available from the key servers

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:31:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > ext3-journalled-quotas-2.patch > ext3: journalled quota >... This patch broke modular quota: WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.4-mm1/kernel/fs/quota_v2.ko needs unknown symbol mark_info_dirty cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There

Hi all, I was just wondering if the following bugfix in 2.6.4 was a serious problem that could cause a problem in a destination file and if it did would that get picked up by the checksum ? Cheers - Steve - Fixed a potential protocol-corrupting bug where the generator could merge a message from the receiver into the middle of a multiplexed packet of data if only part of that

Markus Kemkes m?chte die Nachricht "[rsync-announce] Rsync 2.6.4 released" zur?ckrufen.

I have released rsync 2.6.4. This version has quite a few enhancements over 2.6.3, some optimizations in the delete handling, and the usual collection of bug fixes. I'd like to say "thanks" to everyone who downloaded and tested one of the pre-release versions -- the feedback was very helpful! A summary of the changes since 2.6.3 is available here:

I have released rsync 2.6.4. This version has quite a few enhancements over 2.6.3, some optimizations in the delete handling, and the usual collection of bug fixes. I'd like to say "thanks" to everyone who downloaded and tested one of the pre-release versions -- the feedback was very helpful! A summary of the changes since 2.6.3 is available here:

Hi, I'll be retaining a bit more 2.6.4, since I'm still missing some feedback and checks to maximize confidence... > The remainder on my side is: > - some completion on HP SNMP, > - merge branch-var-range > - merge LiebertPSP-2012-05-09.diff from Charles > - a massive update on blazer HCL, all this is done > - shut switch (mge-shut->mge-shut-old ;

Hi All, I'm new to Nut and had been looking for a way of monitoring a small UPS we have just designed. We are using simple contact closure circuit, but I don't appear to be able to get the Genericups driver to work. I've followed the documentation and have decided to try the APC upstype = 1 If I type 'genericups -x upstype=1 /dev/ttys0' , I get an error: 'Fatal error:

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20040414/e4d94ced/attachment.bin

Hi, I got this error after a transaction was interrupted by me and a new (slightly updated) transaction was started. ... fedora/1/en/i386/base/pkglist.dag.bz2 1246954 100% 67.79kB/s 0:00:17 (27, 1.7% of 201557) Invalid file index 1777522462 (count=201557) rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at sender.c(152) On both ends exactly the same rsync was used. It's a

The delete-dir-and-suffix patch creates two new command line options as follows: --delete-dir --delete-suffix The delete-dir and delete-suffix options give the ability to store backup of deleted files on the receiver in different directories or with different suffix than the backup of files that have been changed but that are still on the source drive. Both commands can be

I've upgraded all my Windows servers with the new released cwRsync version, so they're all running the latest rsync now. But this version seems to ignore exitcodes, since my batchscript does not restart the job when a timeout occurs. Before, rsync did set the errorlevel on exit, so my script knew what to do then. When you just give an empty rsync command, it should also exit with an

Hello All, I have compiled Rsync 2.6.4 on HP UX 11 using gcc 4.0. rsync binary fails to query DNS for a host name. If I give IP address instead of host name everything works ok. I tried to run snoop on DNS server by failed to recieve any packets. This would mean that rsync is not every hitting DNS server. I get this error message *rsync -v hello:: rsync: getaddrinfo: hello 873: host nor

Hi, I've been trying to rsync some folders from my debian pc to a suse server. I created an exclude file called exclude_files.txt where one can read the following: ^/proc/* /prova1/ /var* *.o *.swp ^/dev* When I execute de command: rsync -aulHI --delete --partial --modify-window=2 --log-format=" %t %o %l %f " --stats \

Since I admin the gateway for a network of bandwidth-greedy machines, I figured that esfq with "hash src" would be a more fair allocation of bandwidth than sfq. Unfortunately, there didn''t seem to be a recent patch for 2.6, so I endeavored to build one. The three patches I made (described below) are available within the attached tar.bz2 or at: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ 1. I

I am wondering if there are known incompatibilities between 2.6.3 and 2.6.4? I have a debian box with 2.6.4 and a FC3 box with 2.6.3. Most of the time rsync works fine between the two but I am running this command on FC3 box: rsync -azvv --stats --delete --files-from=/root/.rsb2.tmp / nathan@debian:/home/backup/bkp.01 And I am getting this error message: building file list ... [sender] expand

Hi Guys, 2012/3/12 Michal Soltys <soltys at ziu.info>: > On 12-03-09 00:21, Greg A. Woods wrote: >> >> >> I had independently made a similar change to the apcsmart driver to keep >> it from failing when tcgetattr() reported some irrelevant differences in >> the port settings. ?What's actually in the patch now is my merge of the >> change from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 ------- Additional Comments From dalgoda@ix.netcom.com 2005-04-24 11:36 ------- It looks like the culprit is the change for receiver.c 1.130. It pulled the call to send_file_list(-1,...), which is what handled the one_file_system code. It's not like we can easily go back either, since flist.c 1.267 removed support for f=-1. Bummer. --

Hi, the last commit to upssched.c (Merge Coverity branch, r3555) broke upssched with commands that have a second argument. If a command with a second argument is used, "enc" in line 697 is not an empty buffer and snprintfcat() just appends some stuff, i.e. the following command CANCEL onbatt online becomes onlineCANCEL "onbatt" "online" and is then sent to the