similar to: Feature request for rsync for running scripts

Is there any way to disable the checksum block search in rsync, or to somehow optimize it for systems that are processor-bound in addition to being network bound? I'm using rsync on very low power embedded systems to rsync files that are sometimes comparatively large (sometimes a few hundred megs in size or larger), and am finding that just the operation of the checksumming one such file on

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1529 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-07-14 09:55

Hello, I'm attempting to use the pre-xfer exec and post-xfer exec utilities to replace a complicated script which tails the rsync log and does A Bunch Of Stuff at the beginning and completion of rsync transfers. (It will also allow us to throw away a nasty hack which forces rsync to log the fact that is exiting - trying to provide a catch for /all/ possible exit conditions (ie, strings in the

(I think the subject is quite descriptive; however for use-cases and details see bellow after the mention of the old conversation and the patch.) Searching the mailing list about this topic yields an old conversation about this from 2008: * https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-November/022148.html * https://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-November/022150.html I'll quote

On 14/01/2015 03:56, Emmett Culley wrote: > On 01/13/2015 12:10 PM, Mateusz Guz wrote: >> Have you found a solution? >> >> Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ? >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce >>

I'm using the rsync protocol to keep a windows and linux system mirrored. I have set up the rsync and ssh to run properly, but I would like to know if there is an option, whether in the rsync command or placed in the rsyncd.conf file where I can call a script that runs each time rsync executes? The reason i need to do this is to change the groups/permissions of files when they are transferred

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3778 Summary: rsync triggers ( pre/post xter scripts ) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hello, I am trying to configure rsyncd to mount destination encrypted FS (using EncFS) before syncing. In my rsyncd.conf : [test] path = /home/dest <...> pre-xfer exec = sleep 30 ; echo mypassword | encfs -S /home/ encrypteddir /home/dest ; sleep 30 (I have put "sleep 30" instructions just to make some tests) /home/encrypteddir is correctly mounted by rsyncd to /home/dest

Have you found a solution? Did u allow master dns server to update the slave in /etc/named.conf ? -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 7:02 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Zone file not written to slave DNS server On 1/11/2015 9:28 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:

Dear developers, I need the feature of separately jailed, user writeable and user owned home dirs very badly because I have an SFTP server with 500 users who are partly nested could you please add a feature to set non root chroots with the %h option ? Otherwise I have to rewrite the chroot patch for 4.7p1 :-( thank you very much in advance Dirk

The sshd server has what I think is a serious flaw. There appears to be no way to turn off remote command execution. (someone please correct me if I am wrong). We have a server which uses a chroot jail, and rbash to severely limit what users can do on our system. The remote command bypasses all of that. ie. ssh user at host cat /etc/passwd will display the password file for the live system

Wayne, I've been experimenting with the {pre,post}-xfer exec options ever since the original diff showed up in patches/ - fantastic stuff. My feature request/change centers around the new RSYNC_ARG# variables. Would it be possible to make these available as an array (ie: ${RSYNC_ARG[#]}) rather than discrete variables? If nothing else, it would greatly simplify chewing through all the args

Hello, whereas most people take passwd/shadow/ldap/<whatever> as the place where decision on a chrooted environment / sandbox for certain users is met (just set the given usershell appropriateley), I needed a somewhat different approach. Below is a tiny patch to 2.2.0p1 which enhances the sshd-config by two options and, when set, places all users / users of a certain group immediately in

Hello, I am trying to setup a file server using the SFTP protocol with OpenSSH. I am in trouble because sshd refuses to chroot to a directory that is writable by users other than the owner. I guess that this is to prevent someone else from creating a .ssh/authorized_keys file and impersonate the user. But we have configured an alternative AuthorizedKeysFile. I also understand that a chroot user

Hi! I do a rsync between 2 machines. The throughput is only 2 MByte/Sec. Each machine is a Supermicro server with 2 x 8 Core Opteron 6128 64 GByte of ECC RAM 1 LSI MegaRAID SAS 9280-24i4e 24 x 2TByte SATA Disks as a RAID6 2 Intel Corporation 82599EB 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network-cards Both run Ubuntu 11.04 64Bit. Both use rsync version 3.0.7 protocol version 30 There are no

Dear rsync-guru's, here's a user question: I want to make sure the files transferred to rsync daemon (running on a linux kernel) are written to media I assume if rsync command returns (with 0) all data has been tranferred to rsync daemon, but it depends on the rsync daemon priority and linux pdflush daemon before the data is truly written to physical media (whatever that is). Is there

I'm trying to do something slightly silly; rather than having a C5 machine and a C6 machine around for compiling and testing, I want to create a C5 chroot area. Something similar to "mock" but using lvm snapshots and some local config specific stuff. (Potentially even using Linux Containers to enter the chroot environment). So I thought I'd build out the chroot... % cat

Hourly I have an rsync job backup /home to /home/backup. I have 24 directories (one for each hour): home.0 ... home.23 Here is the script I am running via cron: #! /usr/local/bin/bash dest=`date +%k | sed 's/ //g'` linkdir=`date -v-1H +%k | sed 's/ //g'` chflags -R noschg /home/backup rm -rf /home/backup/home.$dest rsync -ahHP --numeric-ids --delete --stats --link-dest=../

Hello everybody, I'd like to get SSH provide some virtual server feature. Eg. when connecting to an existing server on a different port I'd like to chroot all users to some directory. This can currently be done by starting sshd twice, with different config files (or perhaps command line options); but getting that "right" for all circumstances (init.d, upstart, systemd,

Hello, anybody has a clue why this happens? The scenario: Each night I create LVM snapshot of my volume which contains some virtual disk images (VirtualBox VDIs). Then I rsync the content of one of the snapshot directories to a backup server. Each file size is between 1.3 GB and 6GB. I run the following commmand: sudo -u rsyncbackup rsync -avzP --exclude-from /home/rsyncbackup/excludefile -e