similar to: can I preserve UIDs/GIDs when transferring with rsync?

Hello, Is there a list of software phones which will work with Asterisk? For Linux and Windows? I don't have any hardware yet, and before I buy anything I would like to know how Asterisk really works (with software "phones" for example). Tomek

First, yes, I have read the piece on chroot.... Trying to get an AIX (5.3) to run rsync 2.6.2 as a daemon I have tried every possibly usage to stop chroot, used no and false, as on the web it has showed up as either. Also dropped flag --numeric-ids when running.... Here is my test config--- # Simple test config file log file = /tmp/rsync.log [test] use chroot = no path = /tmp/rsync_test/

I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 clients. I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two sets of machines. The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes and their uids/gids are in sync across all four of them. The Samba 3.6 domain members currently have: idmap config MBSW : backend = rid idmap config

Le 14/01/2018 à 15:51, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 > Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix >> UIDs and GIDs. >> >> In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other >> domains, so

Is there any SIMPLE way to maintain consistent mappings between windows RIDs and UNIX/LINUX UIDs/GIDs among multiple samba servers servers running winbindd? Will that problem be addressed in future samba releases? I've read about the "idmap backend" possible solution but is that the only current one? Help!!!

Hi, For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix UIDs and GIDs. In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other domains, so I need to take care that there won't be any UID/GID conflict. Also, I assume that in the future Samba will be able to restore deleted objects, so I need to avoid conflicts with those objects as well. This makes me think that a

Hello, I'm trying to get my Eicon Diva 2.01 PCI ISDN card working with Asterisk and was told that I still have some chance if I tried using chan_capi. I tried compiling it (chan_capi) on two systems running 2.6 kernels, but got lots of errors. Before I go investigating - is it possible to compile chan_capi on 2.6 kernels? Or does it work with 2.4 ones only? Tomek

I saw Active Directory a bit today and was impressed with the ease one can manage many Windows workstations with that. Especially I liked the software installation (too bad it can install MSI packages only) and the ability to run custom scripts on the workstations (when the boot up etc.). Is it possible to run a custom script for a given machine when it boots up (that is already joined to

Kevin Korb <kmk <at> sanitarium.net> writes: > > 3) --numeric-ids copies both as the number. This is what you normally > want for backups. This way you have the exact UID and GID stored on > the backups regardless of what those numbers mean to the backup > system. Just remember to use --numeric-ids when you restore. This is > especially important if you have to

Hi All, Yesterday, I've upgraded my Samba server from 3.021c to 3.023 through yum upgrade samba*. I'm running Fedora Core 4 Kernel 2.6.17-1.2142 on this server. After upgrade has been completed, I lost the attributes of ownership and groups. I noticed that the uids/gids have changed for all AD accounts. This means that users can't have total access for their files and no access

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm wondering how essential it is to ensure that Samba User/Group to UIDs/GIDs mapping across various Samba servers remain consistent. I realise that Samba uses the extended ACLs and also uses extended attributes to store blobs of Windows ACL information; specifically the reason for this is that Windows ACLs don't map 1:1 with POSIX

Hi William, > I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 > clients. > I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two sets of > machines. > > The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: > > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > > and their uids/gids are in sync across all four of them. > > The Samba 3.6 domain

Hello, I?m trying to use winbind to allow my AD users to logon to our linux computers. I?m using FC6 and Samba 3.0.23c-2. I have several problems: 1. When I start linux machine and immediately ofter logging in I try to check trust secret by running wbinfo -t I receive this error: checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was NT_STATUS_DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_NOT_FOUND (0xc0000233)

On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:53:15 +0100 Yvan Masson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > For a new samba domain, I need to create users and groups with Unix > UIDs and GIDs. > > In the future, it is possible that there will be a trust with other > domains, so I need to take care that there won't be any UID/GID > conflict. Also, I assume that in the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 No, rsync would store the files with the numeric UID and GID as is on the source without regard to the existence or non-existence of a matching account. This could mean that ls would show numbers in those columns, or incorrect names in those columns, or (perhaps by coincidence) show the correct names in those columns. The important thing is that if

Hello, I have a severe problem with gluster: User and Group IDs are broken, but not in all directories: drwxr-xr-x 103 p_kohn01 p0wess 4096 24. Jul 17:22 2013_07_24_17:22_10kupsilon_flat ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? 2013_08_10_00:44_500k_upsilon_flat ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? 2013_08_12_21:54_500k_upsilon_flat_1s drwxr-xr-x 2 p_kohn01 p0wess 6 6.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rsync has 4 options for this... 1) Write all files as the owner and group that rsync is running as. This is the default and the only possibility when not running as root since only root can create files as a different UID. 2) Copy the user name and group name. This is what you get when you are running as root and use --owner --group or --archive.

On 22/12/14 17:22, Denis Cardon wrote: > Hi William, > >> I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 >> clients. >> I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two >> sets of >> machines. >> >> The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: >> >> idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes >>

Hi, I have Samba 3.0.4 on Solaris 9, recent patches applied. Samba is integrated in domain (security = domain). I have compiled and configured winbind, but not pam and no ldap. Ncsd is stopped. Winbind works OK, I can connect to share and users get mapped on-the-fly to UNIX uids and gids in the ranges specified in smb.conf. My config is included below with some tweaks to protect the innocent.

Hi Wayne et al, I've been using Linux for a little over a year now. I'm making improvements to the English phrasing used by luckyBackup which uses rsync. English is my first language and I'm doing this so that I can, then, more accurately make translations for the Spanish language. I would like to know how rsync would manage the situation where the UID and GID(s), of a file being