similar to: [Bug 2790] Add support for converting filenames into different encodings

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2790 ------- Comment #3 from wayned@samba.org 2006-01-16 20:51 MST ------- I've been working on a filename-conversion solution that uses the iconv() function. After putting a bunch of thought into various designs, I think I have a good solution that I have coded up as a patch for the latest CVS version (also available in the latest

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2790 ------- Comment #5 from mangoo@interia.pl 2006-03-29 04:11 MST ------- I'm just curious. Suppose I have rsyncd running on Windows, and want to copy files from there to a Linux machine. The problem is that some characters (like German umlauts - ü, ö, ä etc.) are changed to ? when saved on the Linux side. Where should I apply this patch?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2790 ------- Comment #12 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2009-10-30 10:48 CST ------- The stable rsync has had --iconv for a while now. Is there a reason this bug isn't marked fixed? (If someone wants to pursue my idea from comment #10, they should enter a new bug or at least narrow the summary of this one.) -- Configure bugmail:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2790 cabo@tzi.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cabo@tzi.org ------- Comment #9 from cabo@tzi.org 2007-10-30 11:09 CST ------- The current solution appears to be somewhat confused about

Hi, One feature missing from rsync, and requested on this list before, is on-the-fly conversion of filename character encoding. For example, I often need to sync files having Hebrew filenames from a UTF-8 system (Linux) to an ISO8859-8 system (Cygwin on Windows 2000 using the non-Unicode Win32 interface). Other circumstances surely abound. Attached is a patch against rsync 2.6.2 that adds an

This patch adds a switch --fat-filenames which replaces all characters that aren't legal on FAT filesystems with an underscore. This is the first time I touch the rsync code, so I may not be going about it the right way, but it seems to be working. Naturally there's some potential for collisions, but it's probably better than what happens currently (such files are simply not copied).

I am attemting to use glmD in order to use latex(obj) afterwards. Glm works fine, glmD throws an error: > conv.go <- glmD(cbind(go.cnt,tot.cnt-go.cnt)~sn+rcs(relAge,4)+termfac+rate:termfac+ + I(relAge*term>(term-1.25))+I((prevbal/tot.cnt)*1e-4)+prod+newmort+ +

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2790 Summary: mkstemp fails for paths which include extended (8-bit) characters Product: rsync Version: 2.6.5 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3362 Summary: Add option to normalize Unicode filenames Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: mike@big.faceless.org

I assume there's some good reason for the way filenames are faithfully maintained as temp files, but it's a little frustrating when you get "filename too long" messages as a result... with no indication of what file it was it's complaining about. The obvious fix is to simply generate a tmpname and have done with it. Possibly safer, truncate the filename, in case there's

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-06-29 10:22

Under Solaris 10 on a 4 core Sun Ultra 40 with 20GB RAM, I am setting up a Sun StorageTek 2540 with 12 300GB 15K RPM SAS drives and connected via load-shared 4Gbit FC links. This week I have tried many different configurations, using firmware managed RAID, ZFS managed RAID, and with the controller cache enabled or disabled. My objective is to obtain the best single-file write performance.

http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/06/09/2336223/Apple-Removes-Nearly-All-Reference-To-ZFS

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297 Summary: merge test fails Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us QAContact:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5296 Summary: Failed to create rounding.h! Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us

I have attached a patch that adds 4 options to rsync that have helped me to speed up my mirroring. I hope this is useful to someone else, but I fear that my relative inexperience with rsync has caused me to miss a way to do what I want without having to patch the code. So please let me know if I'm all wet. Here's my story: I have a large filesystem (around 20 gigabytes of data) that

I''ve got a server that freezes when I run a zpool scrub from cron. Zpool scrub runs fine from the command line, no errors. The freeze happens within 30 seconds of the zpool scrub happening. The one core dump I succeeded in taking showed an arccache eating up all the ram. The server''s running Solaris 10 u3, kernel patch 127727-11 but it''s been patched and seems to have

Hello! I''am setup zfs / cifs home storage server, end now have low performance with play movie stored on this zfs from windows client. server hardware is not new , but n windows it perfomance was normal. CPU is AMD Athlon Burton Thunderbird 2500, runing on 1,7GHz, 1024 RAM and storage: usb c4t0d0 ST332062-0A-3.AA-298.09GB /pci at 0,0/pci1458,5004 at 2,2/cdrom at 1/disk at

If there were a ?zfs send? datastream saved someplace, is there a way to verify the integrity of that datastream without doing a ?zfs receive? and occupying all that disk space? I am aware that ?zfs send? is not a backup solution, due to vulnerability of even a single bit error, and lack of granularity, and other reasons. However ... There is an attraction to ?zfs send? as an augmentation to the

Interesting flash technology overview and SSD review here: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3403 and another review here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Intel-x25-m-SSD,2012.html Regards, -- Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc,Plano,TX al at logical-approach.com Voice: 972.379.2133 Timezone: US CDT OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005