similar to: [Bug 2645] New: --one-file-system semantics changed with 2.6.4 (bug?)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645 ------- Additional Comments From dalgoda@ix.netcom.com 2005-04-24 11:36 ------- It looks like the culprit is the change for receiver.c 1.130. It pulled the call to send_file_list(-1,...), which is what handled the one_file_system code. It's not like we can easily go back either, since flist.c 1.267 removed support for f=-1. Bummer. --

Probably have already seen this, but since I didn't see in the email archives: thune:/usr/src/syslinux/syslinux-2.12-pre1# make install make -C sample com32 all make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/syslinux/syslinux-2.12-pre1/sample' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `com32'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/syslinux/syslinux-2.12-pre1/sample' make: *** [installer]

Hi room, There seems to be a problem with the Windows building machines of R-Forge. All our packages with Fortran source code cannot be compiled for Windows. The error in the log file is make[3]: gfortran: Command not found It seems that gfortran is not installed. Is there any plan to fix this or am I doing something wrong on R-Forge? thanks in advance for your advises. regards, Yohan --

Summer Internship at ETH Zurich "Dynamic Portfolio Asset Allocation" We offer a 3-months internship starting midth July 2008. The topic addresses "Dynamic Portfolio Asset Allocation" including alternative instruments and hedge funds. The goal will be to compare the robust mean-variance, the lower partial moment and the conditional value-at-risk approaches for portfolio

Dear Members of the R-Core Team, Rmetrics Developers, and Rmetrics Users ... The repository of the development version of the Rmetrics software environment has been moved to R-forge. The new R-Forge framework for R-project developers based on GForge offers us easy access to SVN, daily built and checked packages, mailing lists, bug tracking,

Computational Finance and Financial Engineering 1st R/Rmetrics Summer School and 4th User/Developer Meeting Meielisalp, Lake Thune Switzerland, June 27 - July 1, 2010 Late Registration: https://www.rmetrics.org/meielisalp2010-registration Students: Apply for Student Scholarships www.rmetrics.org *** Rmetrics 2010 - Don't miss it ! ***

I have released rsync 2.6.4. This version has quite a few enhancements over 2.6.3, some optimizations in the delete handling, and the usual collection of bug fixes. I'd like to say "thanks" to everyone who downloaded and tested one of the pre-release versions -- the feedback was very helpful! A summary of the changes since 2.6.3 is available here:

I have released rsync 2.6.4. This version has quite a few enhancements over 2.6.3, some optimizations in the delete handling, and the usual collection of bug fixes. I'd like to say "thanks" to everyone who downloaded and tested one of the pre-release versions -- the feedback was very helpful! A summary of the changes since 2.6.3 is available here:

Hi, the last commit to upssched.c (Merge Coverity branch, r3555) broke upssched with commands that have a second argument. If a command with a second argument is used, "enc" in line 697 is not an empty buffer and snprintfcat() just appends some stuff, i.e. the following command CANCEL onbatt online becomes onlineCANCEL "onbatt" "online" and is then sent to the

Sorry, aber 2.6.4 ist ZIEMLICH GEIL. Da m?ssen wir mal die neuen schalterchen ausprobieren. (delete-after zum Beispiel) Ich lass Dich raus aus so was. Gruss Markus -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: rsync-announce-bounces+ulrichd=voelcker.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-announce-bounces+ulrichd=voelcker.com@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von rsync-announce@lists.samba.org Gesendet:

I am wondering if there are known incompatibilities between 2.6.3 and 2.6.4? I have a debian box with 2.6.4 and a FC3 box with 2.6.3. Most of the time rsync works fine between the two but I am running this command on FC3 box: rsync -azvv --stats --delete --files-from=/root/.rsb2.tmp / nathan@debian:/home/backup/bkp.01 And I am getting this error message: building file list ... [sender] expand

Since I admin the gateway for a network of bandwidth-greedy machines, I figured that esfq with "hash src" would be a more fair allocation of bandwidth than sfq. Unfortunately, there didn''t seem to be a recent patch for 2.6, so I endeavored to build one. The three patches I made (described below) are available within the attached tar.bz2 or at: http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ 1. I

I've released rsync 2.6.4pre4. I believe that this version will be what gets released as 2.6.4, hopefully on Wednesday. Please try this out and let me know if anything is amiss. All the changes since 2.6.3 are mentioned here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/NEWS You'll also find a preview of the man pages in the same dir (as usual):

Hi Guys, 2012/3/12 Michal Soltys <soltys at ziu.info>: > On 12-03-09 00:21, Greg A. Woods wrote: >> >> >> I had independently made a similar change to the apcsmart driver to keep >> it from failing when tcgetattr() reported some irrelevant differences in >> the port settings. ?What's actually in the patch now is my merge of the >> change from

I've released rsync 2.6.4pre4. I believe that this version will be what gets released as 2.6.4, hopefully on Wednesday. Please try this out and let me know if anything is amiss. All the changes since 2.6.3 are mentioned here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/NEWS You'll also find a preview of the man pages in the same dir (as usual):

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:31:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > ext3-journalled-quotas-2.patch > ext3: journalled quota >... This patch broke modular quota: WARNING: /lib/modules/2.6.4-mm1/kernel/fs/quota_v2.ko needs unknown symbol mark_info_dirty cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There

Hi all, I was just wondering if the following bugfix in 2.6.4 was a serious problem that could cause a problem in a destination file and if it did would that get picked up by the checksum ? Cheers - Steve - Fixed a potential protocol-corrupting bug where the generator could merge a message from the receiver into the middle of a multiplexed packet of data if only part of that

Markus Kemkes m?chte die Nachricht "[rsync-announce] Rsync 2.6.4 released" zur?ckrufen.

Hi, I'll be retaining a bit more 2.6.4, since I'm still missing some feedback and checks to maximize confidence... > The remainder on my side is: > - some completion on HP SNMP, > - merge branch-var-range > - merge LiebertPSP-2012-05-09.diff from Charles > - a massive update on blazer HCL, all this is done > - shut switch (mge-shut->mge-shut-old ;

Hello All, I have compiled Rsync 2.6.4 on HP UX 11 using gcc 4.0. rsync binary fails to query DNS for a host name. If I give IP address instead of host name everything works ok. I tried to run snoop on DNS server by failed to recieve any packets. This would mean that rsync is not every hitting DNS server. I get this error message *rsync -v hello:: rsync: getaddrinfo: hello 873: host nor