similar to: [Bug 2389] New: block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2389] New: block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats"

2005 Feb 25
3
[Bug 2389] block/character devices on Solaris yield wacky rsync stats
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 ------- Additional Comments From woodd@deshaw.com 2005-02-24 16:43 ------- Created an attachment (id=979) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=979&action=view) Proposed syscall.c patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the
2005 Feb 25
0
[Bug 2390] New: some dry run stats inaccurate
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2390 Summary: some dry run stats inaccurate Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: woodd@deshaw.com QAContact:
2005 Feb 25
1
[Bug 2390] some dry run stats inaccurate
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2390 ------- Additional Comments From woodd@deshaw.com 2005-02-24 17:21 ------- Created an attachment (id=980) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=980&action=view) Proposed sender.c / receiver.c patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
2000 Mar 14
1
Really Wacky Problem!
Hello, I'm getting a really wacky problem with samba running on solaris 2.7 ./smbclient -L zeus -N -- gives: session request to ZEUS failed (Called name not present) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present) The NT side give "\\Zeus is not accesible." "network name was not found" messages The same smb.conf file works on a solaris 2.5 and 2.6
2006 May 23
0
Wacky Failover Situation w/SIP - Bug?
I have a weird situation. A polycom phone is configured to use system pbx1 as the primary outgoing 'proxy', followed by systems pbx3 and pbx2. All three systems have identical sip.conf files. The phone is registered on pbx1. I shut down the Asterisk application on pbx1. I make a call. The phone sends an INVITE to pbx2. Pbx2 sends back a 407 Proxy Auth message to the phone. The phone sends
2011 Jan 26
0
Really wacky problem with internal extensions.
We have an Asterisk server acting as a hosted PBX system for many clients, and we're going through an upgrade to Asterisk 1.6 by moving our most important (and complicated) clients one at a time. But we're having a problem with one customer that I really can't explain. I can place calls directly to one phone at the customer's location (they also have an IVR that asks for an
2007 Jun 06
1
Users can Read but not Write / Delete Files
Hi All, Hi All, Here is a situation where everyone can read to, but not write to or delete, the shares on our Samba server: We moved the file server a few weeks ago - split off some files to a new Windows file server - and users could read but not write files to the old Samba server after it was renamed (SAN to OLDSAN). It turned out SELinux was running, which I disabled, rebooted, and all
2006 Nov 19
0
Problem With Groups in Samba 3.0.23 ?
Hi all, I just upgraded a test copy of my samba server from version 3.0.10E to the latest, 3.0.23D - the RPM available for Red Hat AS4 on the samba.org site. There was no samba-common, just samba, samba-client and samba-winbind RPMs. I installed all three successfully. I backed up my configs before hand and replaces / adapted them afterwards. I successfully added this server to the
2006 Nov 17
1
Groups not emulating in Samba3.0.23d-SerNet-RedHat
Hi all, I just upgraded a test copy of my samba server from version 3.0.10E to the latest, 3.0.23D - the RPM available for Red Hat AS4 on the samba.org site. There was no samba-common, just samba, samba-client and samba-winbind RPMs. I installed all three successfully. I backed up my configs before hand and replaces / adapted them afterwards. I successfully added this server to the domain
2005 Apr 22
5
IAX help
I am trying to send calls from (telx-NY17S) to (telx-nyc) via an IAX2 channel. However the call is being rejected on the (telx-nyc) server. See error below copied from telx-nyc CLI> Apr 22 13:56:57 NOTICE[147465]: chan_iax2.c:5390 socket_read: Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.0.251 I have icluded the following conf files 1. extensions.conf (telx-nyc) 2. iax.conf (telx-nyc) 3.
2007 Apr 13
0
NYC Area R / S / S-Plus Users Group Forming, Thursday, April 26th
Hi gang. So I'm actually carrying through on the threat I made a couple of months back, and helping to start a local users group for the NYC Metropolitan area. Here's a copy of the announcement of our introductory / planning meeting, I also can send a flyer version of this to anyone who wants (Open Office document, should be viewable in MS-Office). Please feel free to attend,
2013 Apr 04
1
Fwd: Important: message being returned.
Is there a way around bounce back? The moderator has not updated his email address. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Postmaster <systems-postmaster@world.deshaw.com> Date: Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM Subject: Important: message being returned. To: anupamtg@gmail.com Thank you for your inquiry. Miheer Kulkarni is no longer with the firm. For immediate assistance, please
2016 Jun 30
0
DNS Suddenly breaking
On 6/30/2016 9:57 AM, Garland McAlexander wrote: > nslookup google.com <http://google.com> > ;; Got recursion not available from 192.168.1.236, trying next server > Server: 192.168.1.235 > Address: 192.168.1.235#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: google.com <http://google.com> > Address: 172.217.4.78 > > > Interesting little bit
2004 Dec 23
1
Service contract for * in NYC area
I've been contracted by a company in NYC area to install and congfigure an * system. However I live 70 miles from nyc, they want a service contract with shomeon local. Are you interested? must show that s/he know linux and asterisk good enough.
2015 Apr 24
1
[Bug 2389] New: update the PROTOCOL.certkeys spec to avoid confusion regarding encoding of critical options fields
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2389 Bug ID: 2389 Summary: update the PROTOCOL.certkeys spec to avoid confusion regarding encoding of critical options fields Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.8p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement
2007 Jul 31
0
FW: NYC Special Event - Join Us
Anyone know what they are going to be announcing? Any relevance to Asterisk? When are we going to see a decent video conferencing implementation into Asterisk? Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd dean at cognation.net <mailto:dean at cognation.net> +1-212-203-4357 Ph +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). ________________________________ From: Polycom Connect
2009 Mar 08
1
Predictive Analytics Seminar: San Jose, NYC, Toronto, more
Hi all, I wanted to let you know about our training seminar on predictive analytics - coming April, May, Oct, and Nov in San Jose, NYC, Stockholm, Toronto and other cities. This is intensive training for marketers, managers and business professionals to make actionable sense of customer data by predicting buying behavior, churn, etc. Past attendees provided rave reviews. Here's more info:
2008 Mar 26
1
generating a paired t-test with multiple levels of a factor
I have been trying to run this analysis and finally want to ask for help. I am trying to run a paired t-test in which I have 19 subjects who have reaction times for 5 different conditions. The data frame has 114 rows total (6 rows for each subject representing six average reaction times by condition). Is there a way to run all paired t-tests where a paired t-test is run for every possible
2015 Dec 03
0
7.2 kernel panic on boot
I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me. https://wiki.centos.org/Download appears to say that 1503 is the current version. I *thought* this wacky CentOS version number would be more like 7.1.1503? Did I miss something? Is there no easy mapping
2015 Dec 03
0
7.2 kernel panic on boot
On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com>: >> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent >> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure >> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me. > > > CentOS 7.1511 (aka