Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2294] New: Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send"
2024 Feb 09
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #39 from andy <andy at digitalsignalperson.com> ---
> This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync.
Funny I am doing exactly this, but I came to rsync looking for a backup for
when ZFS fails. Many consider zfs/btrfs/snapshots as "not a backup".
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #25 from Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua> ---
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
>
> --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
> Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request
> myself, I found
2016 Mar 06
1
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement request
myself, I found everything here and basically have the same use case. My
version is that I am creating a regular backup of logs from many servers'
services onto a single box, and doing so with rsync. Some of those services
2016 Mar 07
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #24 from Karl O. Pinc <kop at meme.com> ---
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 22:20:16 +0000
samba-bugs at samba.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
>
> --- Comment #23 from dajoker at gmail.com ---
> Looking for this capability prior to entering it as an enhancement
> request myself, I found everything
2005 Feb 11
2
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Additional Comments From blackb1rd@seat-ibiza.nl 2005-02-11 01:58 -------
I totally agree this one. With this enhancement there would be no longer
unnecessary traffic when some user has moved / copy'ed a large directory (which
is really annoying).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You
2014 Mar 02
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #20 from kevin.layer at gmail.com 2014-03-02 03:08:37 UTC ---
I've been playing with the --detect-renamed patch
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync-patches.git;a=blob;f=detect-renamed.diff;h=c3e6e846eab437e56e25e2c334e292996ee84345;hb=master
I can't get seem it to work. Does it rely on other patches?
Anyway, in a simple test, using
2007 Jul 11
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
boris@folgmann.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |boris@folgmann.de
------- Comment #6 from boris@folgmann.de 2007-07-11 09:50 CST -------
I'm using rsync 2.6.9 to archive rotated
2008 Nov 30
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Comment #8 from bill+samba@bfccomputing.com 2008-11-30 17:24 CST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Thanks. This will be especially useful for log directories where logrotate is
> incrementing the filename number at each rotation period (httpd.10.gz ->
> httpd.11.gz).
Since I mentioned this specific use case, I should
2016 Dec 30
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #26 from Ben RUBSON <ben.rubson at gmail.com> ---
### What's the diff between --fuzzy and --detect-renamed ?
If I understand correctly, --fuzzy looks only in destination folder, for either
a file that has an identical size and modified-time, or a similarly-named file,
and uses it as a basis file.
Whereas --detect-renamed looks
2017 Jan 22
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #27 from Wolfgang Hamann <wolfgang at maas-noten.de> ---
Hi,
I recently ran into the problem that a large file set got renamed and then
re-sent. I tried to fix after the fact, so I went the obvious way of comparing
sizes and modtimes on the destination and calculate checksums for potential
matches. I would have preferred to use a
2024 Feb 09
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #40 from roland <devzero at web.de> ---
> This feature request is so old it has lost relavence because btrfs/zfs/etc are more optimal backup solutions than rsync.
sorry, but this comment is totally nonsense, as btrfs and zfs are filesystems
(i.e. places to store data) whereas rsync is a tool to sync data from one place
to
2024 Apr 03
0
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #41 from Mihnea-Costin Grigore <mihnea at zulu.ro> ---
The discussion about file systems like ZFS/BTRFS/etc. and their various
snapshot mechanisms is off-topic relative to this feature request, since they
are very different technologies used for different purposes.
rsync is used commonly to synchronise at the *file level* between
2015 Jan 03
1
[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
--- Comment #22 from elatllat at gmail.com ---
Wow 10 years.
Maybe one reason this has not been implemented is there are other options.
For example I have been using a shell script as a wrapper to reduce the
iteration of this bug, here is how it works:
1) Create 2 lists of files; destination and source with the files sizes and
path
2) For each file
2011 Jan 29
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294
------- Comment #12 from phr-samba at nightsong.com 2011-01-28 20:38 CST -------
Hi, I was about to enter a similar suggestion to this. My very frequent use
case is moving files from one directory to another. In that situation the file
name does not change--just the directory path leading to it. These are often
quite large files (0.2 to
2013 Jan 29
0
detect-renamed questions
Hello,
I was looking for "detect renamed" feature in rsync
(https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294) so used rsync-3.0.9
with patches detect-renamed.diff and detect-renamed-lax.diff.
I have 2 questions, not sure if I'm missing something (options) or if
it is working as intended and could be improved.
1) It does not detect a rename when a file is moved into another
2014 Mar 28
4
[Bug 10522] New: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a 'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10522
Summary: --detect-renamed patch is causing deletions as if a
'delete flag' was supplied, when none have been
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Platform: x86
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
2009 Jun 17
0
--detect-renamed
While trying to find a strategy to avoid duplicating renamed files and
folders I came across threads about a "dtetect-renamed" option. This
was a patch back in 2006 but I cannot find much about it later. Was
this aborted? Are there any other ways of smart-ly detecting renames?
--
Rahul
2012 Apr 05
5
[Bug 8847] New: detect-renamed.diff update to ensure existence of directory for partial-dir
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847
Summary: detect-renamed.diff update to ensure existence of
directory for partial-dir
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at
2013 Feb 12
1
dsync 2.1.10 does not correctly handle renames of mailbox subtrees
Hi,
It seems that dsync 2.1.10 does not correctly handle renames of mailbox
subtrees. The scenario is as follows.
There are two servers, A and B, both running dovecot 2.1.10 and configured
to use mdbox. Automatic replication between them is disabled, ie.
replication plugin is not active and replicator service
has process_min_avail = 0. I perform the following actions:
1. On A: doveadm mailbox
2019 Feb 28
1
[virtio-dev] Re: net_failover slave udev renaming (was Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 4/4] netvsc: refactor notifier/event handling code to use the bypass framework)
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:50:44 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:34:56PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2/27/2019 2:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 04:17:21PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2/25/2019 6:08 PM, Michael S.