similar to: [Bug 1792] doing directory only rsync causes an rsync protocol error

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792 Summary: doing directory only rsync causes an rsync protocol error Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1660 Summary: --exclude option causes rsync to fail Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: jguenther@gmail.com

I've released version 2.6.0 of rsync. Two important things to note in the new release: 1. The default remote shell is now "ssh" unless you tell the configure you want to use something else. 2. Some bug fixes in the include/exclude code, while making things work properly, have resulted in some user-visible changes for certain wildcard strings. Read the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1508 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-02-25 11:14 ------- I am unable to duplicate this using 2.6.3 on cygwin.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1508 Summary: Using options --modify-window and --password-file cause error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2831 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-06-30 10:00 ------- Created an attachment (id=1292) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1292&action=view) Ignore EEXIST on second mkdir() call -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because:

I announced the release of 2.6.3pre1 on the rsync-announce mailing list back on the 12th. I was thinking at the time that this email would get seen by those on the regular rsync list, but I forgot that this is not how the rsync lists are setup. For those that missed it, here is the text of the announcement: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-10-08 14:49 ------- There is a diff in the patches directory named

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1673 Summary: Verbose dry run doesn't report replacements of symlink with directory Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2208 Summary: rsync failed at random file with same error rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase "unknown" [sender]: Connection reset by peer (104) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4786 Summary: deletes files in parent directory when destination directory doesn't exist Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

I have released rsync 2.6.3pre2 -- the second (and final) pre-release version of 2.6.3. Please help out with the testing so that the code gets a good workout before 2.6.3 is released. (Note that this version will not be in testing for as long as 2.6.3pre1 was -- I'd like to get it released in a week or two, if possible.) To see what has changed since 2.6.2, read this text file:

I have released rsync 2.6.3pre2 -- the second (and final) pre-release version of 2.6.3. Please help out with the testing so that the code gets a good workout before 2.6.3 is released. (Note that this version will not be in testing for as long as 2.6.3pre1 was -- I'd like to get it released in a week or two, if possible.) To see what has changed since 2.6.2, read this text file:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2158 Summary: Rsync discontinues when large files are vanished or updated Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1477 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-06-24 10:49

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1660 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-08-25 08:32 ------- This is because you're manually specifying the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1633 Summary: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(359) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: Alpha URL: http://www.snailbook.com/faq/scp-ossh-to-ssh2.auto.html OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 Summary: TLS for rsync protocol Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All URL: http://metastatic.org/source/rsync-ssl.patch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi, Using "--delete-after" does not work with 2.6.3pre1 (sender, Fedora Core 2) and 2.5.7 (receiver, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3): > building file list ... > 3288 files to consider > skipping non-regular file "" > Invalid file index 1879320506 in recv_files (count=1) > rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at receiver.c(345) > rsync: connection

Hi all! I've read the manual and google'ed aplenty, but sadly can't figure out this particular issue. Perhaps someone can thwack me with the correct cluestick? I have a number of directories listed under one path in an rsyncd module. I'd like to rsync the contents of some of the directories. Here's essentially what the source filesystem looks like: /home /home/user1