similar to: [Bug 1536] New: rsync aborts transferring files larger than 2 GB

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-07-30 13:30 ------- Created an attachment (id=589) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=589&action=view) Add checks for open64 and mkstemp64 to configure If the user's system has open64() but not mkstemp64(), we avoid using mkstemp(). -- Configure bugmail:

Rsync bug in handling files larger than 2 GB *even with 64 bit compilation options* We use files in my environment at work that sometimes requires to transfer files with sizes like 2-10 GB each file. I get the following error from rsync after if copies p a part from the file: write failed on doc_all_030414.dmp.Z : Error 0 rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at receiver.c(243) rsync:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1495 Summary: 2.6.x generates protocol stream error running as server daemon on HP-UX 11.11 Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: PA-RISC OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

I got Large files working fine on Solaris, just make a 64bit binary :). Seriously, I would try making a 64bit binary for HPUX as well(something like +DA2.0W for 64bit PA_RISC). Robert Weber University of Colorado -------- > > I am currently writing disaster recovery software for the company I work > for. I have been watching rsync development now for the past couple of

Hello, I read the suggestion posted on this list about adding -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE to build rsync, but it does not work correctly on my platform which is an: 9000/800/N4000-55 with 64bit hp-ux using HP's C compiler (B3901BA) i solved the problem by building rsync as a 64 bit application: CFLAGS='+O3 +DD64' ./configure --prefix=/opt/rsync could you please add this flag to configure if

So I have Need For Speed Porsche Unleased and I have ubuntu 6.06 LTS and I have wine 0.9.90-ubuntu2 which I installed using the package manager . So I simply use wine and I get to play NFS on ubuntu simple right. I install NFS and everything goes fine. I then go to wincfg and add NFS and change it to run in 98. Error one I run the shortcut on my desktop in a terminal and I get this

Hi All, I'm trying to migrate from an NT4 domain to samba-3... sorry this is so long... when I run the "net rpc vampire" I get errors for users and machines in uppercase or contain uppercase chars. I'm in a test env before I go live! I'm on a gentoo distro w/ shadow. useradd FOO errors, this might be the culprit... I set up some dummy accts and made them members of

Oops, forgot to put a subject... apologies for the repost... (newb!) > Hi All, > > I'm trying to migrate from an NT4 domain to samba-3... > sorry this is so long... > > when I run the "net rpc vampire" I get errors for users and machines > in uppercase or contain uppercase chars. > > I'm in a test env before I go live! > > I'm on a

I received the following bug report for the Debian rsync package today. I wouldn't have expected 2.6.4 to refuse to talk to even a 2.6.2 in this way... Perhaps Wayne could comment? Paul Slootman On Tue 26 Apr 2005, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > > Rsync fails to push filters to the the remote host if the remote rsync > is older than the Debian's. I've tried to connect to a

Hello, I know it''s off-topic. But I''m sure you are using SQL and can help me ;) I''ve a table CARS and a table KEYS and a LOCKS table. CARS id|name 1|audi 2|ford 3|mazda 4|porsche ... KEYS id|car_id|lock_id 1|1|1 2|2|1 3|2|2 4|3|1 5|3|2 6|4|1 7|4|2 8|4|3 ... LOCKS id|name 1|main 2|spare 3|engine ... A car can have many keys. Keys are for different locks. How can I

Hello, I can't transfer big files. In the output below, you can see that rsync only transfer 1383275520 of a 5448046592 bytes file: F:\shells>rsync -e ssh -avz ./backup chris@myhost.com:backups chris@myhost.com's password: building file list ... done wrote 114 bytes read 20 bytes 3.01 bytes/sec total size is 1383275520 speedup is 10322951.64 I've tried with other big files and

Hi Folks.. We have started to convert our Veritas clustered systems over to ZFS root to take advantage of the extreme simplification of using Live Upgrade. Moving the data of these systems off VxVM and VxFS is not in scope for reasons to numerous to go into.. One thing my customers noticed immediately was a reduction in "free" memory as reported by ''top''. By way

HI, The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic. We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following performance results. Test Setup: Solaris 10: 11/06 Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS) Sun Fire v490 server LSI Raid 3994 on backend ZFS Record Size: 128KB (default) VxFS Block Size: 8KB(default) The only thing

Hi, sorry if I am brining up old news, but I couldn''t find a good answer searching the previous posts (My mom always says I am bad with finding things :) However I noticed a difference when creating a zfs filesystem compared with a vxfs filesystem in the available size. ie. ZFS zonedata/zfs [b]392G[/b] 120G 272G 31% /zfs VxFS /dev/vx/dsk/zonedg/zonevol

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2207 Summary: Listing of available sync-sets is very different with or without ssh Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

problem: rsync hangs most of the time but not always. When it works it finishes within a few secs. When it hangs it will hang for 2-20 minutes but then finally finish. machines - both are dual processor Sun opteron with Fedora FC2 command: rsync --verbose --checksum --archive --delete --cvs-exclude --delete-excluded --rsh=ssh /data/sites www1-be:/data | tee -a $log 2>&1 source tree:

Hi. Strange error whilst trying to copy a large data-set across a LAN. Invalid file index 522565453 (count=10365) rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at sender.c(151) This error occurs whenever I try to rsync this data structure. Any ideas on what I could do to stop this? The exact same binary is used on both machines. Thanks. Stuart Command line used: FLAGS="-vac

Hi - a question for all ye rsync guru's out there... I have a need to migrate some fairly large Oracle datafiles from a UFS filesystem to VxFS (VERITAS), however I am not being allowed nearly enough outage time to perform a standard file copy migration. The datafiles (of which there are about 4 are about 50GB each in size and on separate UFS filesystems. I am considering instigating a local

Hi, rsync was running against filesystems /disk5 and /disk7 to back them onto remote server (172.16.101.4) using the following script: if [ `ps -ef | grep -v grep | grep ::d5 | /usr/bin/wc -l` -eq 0 ] then rm -f /etc/rsync5.log echo " --- Disk5 --- starts `date`" > /etc/rsync5.log /usr/local/bin/rsync -a --recursive --compress /disk5/ 172.16.101.4::d5 >> /etc/rsync.log echo

On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Wayne Davison wayned-at-samba.org |Rsync List| wrote: > Would anyone who is seeing this problem please try out the patch that is > attached to this bugzilla bug: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1536 I gave it a test and it seems to work fine on HPUX 11.0. It skips the problematic mkstemp() call. It also passed the largefiles test that I sent