similar to: create directory

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 10:53:14AM +1000, Philip Rhoades via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Roland, > > > On 2020-09-10 21:27, Roland wrote: > > > with rsync hanging - after breakout on /home for writing I then get: > > > "Read-only file system" > > > > if your filesystem switches to read-only, you have a serious problem >

Time Machine will enable ownership on the drive the first time it starts up. The first thing it does when it creates the backup directory is to enable ownership on the drive. I've seen this happen repeatedly (it's actually the easiest way I know of to enable ownership on drive). On 2018-04-03, at 4:05 AM, Dave Gordon via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 20/03/18

Hi. I'm trying to accomplish the following ; 1) First, I did a rsync for a file, like this /usr/bin/rsync -lptgoD --delete --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh -R --delete-excluded -vv root@127.0.0.1:/usr/local/src/* /tmp/localhost/daily.0 If I did a ls -la to the destination dir (/tmp/localhost/daily.0/usr/local/src/README) I take ls -la /tmp/localhost/daily.0/usr/local/src/ total 60 drwxrwsr-x 2 root

Please advise on rsync usage. --delete doesn?t work without recursion(--recursion). The recursion is causing huge overheads for me. My directory trees are huge. Any suggestions through which I can cut overheads. It used to work well in rsync-v2.5.5 /opt/rsync-v2.5.5/bin/rsync --delete --checksum -lptgoD --rsync-path=/opt/rsync-v2.5.5/bin/rsync --hard-links --timeout=5184000 --exclude=.snapshot

People, When I did: rsync -av /home/ /mntb5/ # about 4TB I got errors like: 'rsync [sender] expand file_list pointer array to xxx bytes, "did move"' with rsync hanging - after breakout on /home for writing I then get: "Read-only file system" So after unmounting and remounting /home I did: cd /home find /home/ -type d | sort >

Steve Sills Platnum Computers, President http://www.platnum.com steve@platnum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sills" <steve@platnum.com> To: "jw schultz" <jw@pegasys.ws> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Rsync's Speed > The source server is a Dual 800 Mhz /w a 7200 RPM 40 GB HDD, the dest server > is a P III 450 with a

If I try: rsync -lptgoD -e "ssh -i /root/.ssh/rsync-key" --verbose --exclude="/*.*" --exclude="*.xml" --include="+ */Tariff/" 192.168.1.1:/home/e-smith/files/ibays/frogs/files/dbs/ rsync lists the correct files, but if I add the destination like this: rsync -lptgoD -e "ssh -i /root/.ssh/rsync-key" --verbose --exclude="/*.*"

Roland, On 2020-09-10 21:27, Roland wrote: >> with rsync hanging - after breakout on /home for writing I then get: >> "Read-only file system" > > if your filesystem switches to read-only, you have a serious problem > with your system/storage, not with rsync. > > rsync (or the workload) is simply triggering the problem. Thanks for the response . . Hmm . .

Sent from BlackBerry? on Airtel -----Original Message----- From: rsync-request@lists.samba.org Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:00:33 To:rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: rsync Digest, Vol 58, Issue 29 Send rsync mailing list submissions to rsync@lists.samba.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync or, via email, send a message with

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Normally, I would say that --checksum is actually slower than just > letting rsync re-copy everything Depends on the network capacity and costs associated with that bandwidth :( >and therefore is almost always the > wrong thing to do. Nope,

> On 25 May 2020, at 23:55, Wayne Davison via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I've decided to give hosting it on github a try, especially since there's been a lot of nice contributions lately. Hopefully this will make it easier for both the people sending patches as well as for me to snag the changes. I'll continue to push changes to the samba git as well.

I am seeing some odd behavior on a Solaris 8 system. If I try to access a symlinked file, reduce_name is having a problem with the link >From a level 10 log: [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3, pid=18558] lib/util.c:(387) unix_clean_name [/disk2/OC192/syee_test1.bat] [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3, pid=18558] smbd/vfs.c:(800) reduce_name [disk2/OC192/syee_test1.bat] [/vobstore] [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3,

Hi, I think I found a bug in usage of zlib. rsync 2.5.6 with -z fails like bellow. % cp install-disk2.iso /var/tmp/install-disk2.iso install-disk2.iso 100% |*****************************| 316 MB 00:56 % rsync -vIz install-disk2.iso 127.0.0.1:/var/tmp/install-disk2.iso install-disk2.iso deflate on token returned 0 (16384 bytes left) rsync error: error in rsync protocol

problem is he's trying to rsync into the target dir and have the side effect of delete. so an empty dir would necessarily need to be in the target of course and thus created there, triggering the quota block. he tried to avoid this by using device files then 'blocking all device files' but i think rsync figures out first there's nothing to do, so it just stops and doesnt do the

Thanks Fabi, et all, I will follow up with your suggestion using ssh for renaming the directories after rsync. I appreciate the help. Freddie On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 4:00 AM <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Hi Ram, In OS X, some font types (not all) put the font payload in the resource fork. Netatalk provides AFP filesharing, imitating the resource forks by creating secondary files in ?.Appledouble? folders within each folder. Netatalk tracks the resource forks, and other metadata, by keeping a ?Desktop database? at the root of the shared volume ? look for .AppleDesktop, and .AppleDB. You can

Hi raf, Curious issue you have. A few things: What distro(s) are you using? Same rsync version on both ends? Hash of files look correct before and after the rsync? Have you tried using inotify to monitor for changes at the fs level? You should see a "read" on the sender and a "read" + "write" on the receiver. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 11:25 PM raf via rsync

I have it up and working. for me at least. http://crypotworksapps.blogspot.com/2011/04/windows-and-linux-backups-made-dirt.html On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00 AM, <rsync-request at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Send rsync mailing list submissions to > ? ? ? ?rsync at lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > ? ? ?

Hi. I''m working on getting the most recent ZFS to the FreeBSD''s CVS. Because of the huge amount of changes, I decided to work on ZFS regression tests, so I''m more or less sure nothing broke in the meantime. (Yes, I know about ZFS testsuite, but unfortunately I wasn''t able to port it to FreeBSD, it was just too much work. I''m afraid it is too

There are times when a large file is copied up to 99% and then deleted after having received the error. Other times when the error occurs earlier and only a part of it is copied. Does it make sense to calculate the checksum if in both cases in output I don't have the same information that there is in input ? Because in the first case it is totally deleted and in the second case I have only a