similar to: signature from rsync tar file ...

What may cause this error? I'm trying to run Armored Brigade, which was working perfectly until I upgraded Wine from 1.2.3. to 1.3.24. I can't get sound to work in that game under that version of Wine. I have OSS V4 When I downgrade to 1.2.3. I can't run that game any more as I'm getting a segmentation fault error at start. I have tried uninstalling wine and removing the .wine

Hi, Most companies we work with, have 'designated' crisis management teams. These vary from the insignificant crisis', through to life-threatening crisis'. There is always an assigned emergency services contact, whose job it is in an emergency, to maintain communication with the emergency services. One of our corporate functions is crisis management - so we have to consider

Hello, Anytime when I issue rpm command, there will be a warning massage "warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature". For example, [root at hadoop-datanode44 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i post postgresql-server-8.3.8-1PGDG.rhel4 warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature postgresql-8.3.8-1PGDG.rhel4 postgresql-pgpool-II-2.3.1-1

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2377 Bug ID: 2377 Summary: Add ssh-agent support to ssh-keygen Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh-keygen Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi, I installed CentOS 5 from DVD and noticed this warning at the top of /root/install.log: Installing libgcc - 4.1.1-52.el5.i386 warning: libgcc-4.1.1-52.el5: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897 Wondering if anyone knows why this error occurs. Is this expected? Thanks, Venkat

Hi, I am new to the list although not really new to Xen - I would like to shoot you a quick one regarding the following message logged on xend.log: DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:200) restore:shadow=0x0, _static_max=0x201, _static_min=0x201, DEBUG (balloon:145) Balloon: 29722616 KiB free; need 525312; done. DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:217) [xc_restore]: /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_restore 22 2 1 2 0 0 0 INFO

Hello, I am trying to connect a 2nd Linux machine to my Samba PDC using smbmount. Both machines run Samba 3.0.14a. However, when trying to mount using machine2# /usr/local/samba/bin/smbmount //pdc/wpkg /raid/samba/mount -o username=abc,password=123 it takes some seconds and then only brings up an I/O error. The log on the primary machine brings up [2005/07/19 10:28:36, 1, effective(1008,

I am getting this error while using spreadsheet_on_rails -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

With > R.version.string [1] "R version 2.15.0 alpha (2012-03-14 r58748)" trying to trace a method using the 'signature' argument fails rather than enabling the trace: > trace(initialize, signature="ANY") Error in matchSignature(signature, fdef, where) : trying to match a method signature of class ?signature?; expects a list or a character vector --

I've been having this problem ever since FC5 upgraded above .22 of smbclient: Domain=[IDC] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] smb: \> dir client_check_incoming_message: received message with mid 9 with no matching send record. SMB Signature verification failed on incoming packet! Server packet had invalid SMB signature! listing \* Error in dskattr: Server packet had invalid

HiI have a class which would like to hold a connection to ODBC data connection. The handle to the connection is something like (according to RODBC manual):channel = odbcConnect("DSN",uid="user",pwd="password")However, I would like to make a slot of my "foo" class to hold this object. For example:setClass("foo",

2006/1/27, Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com <Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com>: > > I've successfully installed and configured NUT on my test machine and am > moving it into production. > > http://www.networkupstools.org/source.html offers some good advice... "You > should always use PGP/GPG to verify the signatures before using any source > code" > > But where

When winbind is started I get the following log messages: signing_good: BAD SIG: seq 1 SMB Signature verification failed on incoming packet! After extensive googling the only reference I find is that my kerberos might be too old. (using krb 1.2.4). Can someone confirm is this a bug in kerberos or a bug in samba. If the later is there a workaround or do I have to upgrade to new kerberos?

Author: wyllys Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: c300512c0d2609e729a85ce9f318a9133e7a8b1e Log message: 6217236 pcfs module has incorrect FAT signature check (fix lint) 6310335 mkfs_pcfs FAT size computation is wrong. (fix lint) Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/pcfs/mkfs/mkfs.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/pcfs/pc_vfsops.c

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RalphLauren.com</TITLE> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16788" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=646 border=0>

Is there some way to create a target-specific C-ABI compatible function signature using LLVM? For example, this C-Code:     typedef struct vpt_data {         char x;         int a;         char c;         float b;     } vpt_data;         void vpt_test( vpt_data vd ) { Generates a function:     define void @vpt_test(i64 %vd.coerce0, i64 %vd.coerce1) #0 { And also packs/unpacks the structure

After compiling llvm and the cfrontend, I tried to run llvm2cpp on a few of the .ll files in the test/Regression directory. When I try this, I get the following error: llvm2cpp: Invalid bytecode signature: 5552203B (Vers=0,Pos=4) Any help would be appreciated. thanks, Todd

Thank you for the help. There seem to be several things in my makefiles that are messed up as a result of switching from the gcc3.4 front end to the gcc4 frontend. Is there any documentation listing the things that have changed? Thanks, Ryan Ryan M. Lefever [http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~lefever] On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:06

> Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions of > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same rev number to be safe. For llvm-gcc 2.3, you should use llvm 2.3. You can't use llvm-gcc 2.3 with llvm svn TOT for example. What version of llvm and llvm-gcc

I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1 2008/7/3 Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>: > > > Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions > of > > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. > > If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same > rev number