similar to: signature from rsync tar file ...

There is no sig file for v1.32.3 in http://libguestfs.org/download/1.32-stable/ Nikos

Hi, #tcsh#machine# gpg --verify openssh-4.1p1.tar.gz.asc openssh-4.1p1.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Wed May 25 08:26:24 2005 EDT using DSA key ID 86FF9C48 gpg: BAD signature from "Damien Miller (Personal Key) <djm at mindrot.org>" I made sure that I had the same key loaded that the signature was made with, but that didn't change the error. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Goebel :

(Samba 3.0.1, RedHat 9, share is a w2k3, security = ADS) Here is a snippet of debug level 3 output of an smbclient tar operation, with error at the end. Command is: # smbclient \\\\snapper\\dfs <password> -U Administrator -E -W CISWINNET -D home -d3 -Tqca /tmp/test.tar [2004/01/14 15:05:10, 3] lib/util.c:dos_clean_name(549) dos_clean_name

Hello, Anytime when I issue rpm command, there will be a warning massage "warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature". For example, [root at hadoop-datanode44 ~]# rpm -qa | grep -i post postgresql-server-8.3.8-1PGDG.rhel4 warning: only V3 signatures can be verified, skipping V4 signature postgresql-8.3.8-1PGDG.rhel4 postgresql-pgpool-II-2.3.1-1

Hi, I installed CentOS 5 from DVD and noticed this warning at the top of /root/install.log: Installing libgcc - 4.1.1-52.el5.i386 warning: libgcc-4.1.1-52.el5: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897 Wondering if anyone knows why this error occurs. Is this expected? Thanks, Venkat

Hi, I am new to the list although not really new to Xen - I would like to shoot you a quick one regarding the following message logged on xend.log: DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:200) restore:shadow=0x0, _static_max=0x201, _static_min=0x201, DEBUG (balloon:145) Balloon: 29722616 KiB free; need 525312; done. DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:217) [xc_restore]: /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_restore 22 2 1 2 0 0 0 INFO

Hello, I am trying to connect a 2nd Linux machine to my Samba PDC using smbmount. Both machines run Samba 3.0.14a. However, when trying to mount using machine2# /usr/local/samba/bin/smbmount //pdc/wpkg /raid/samba/mount -o username=abc,password=123 it takes some seconds and then only brings up an I/O error. The log on the primary machine brings up [2005/07/19 10:28:36, 1, effective(1008,

I am getting this error while using spreadsheet_on_rails -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

With > R.version.string [1] "R version 2.15.0 alpha (2012-03-14 r58748)" trying to trace a method using the 'signature' argument fails rather than enabling the trace: > trace(initialize, signature="ANY") Error in matchSignature(signature, fdef, where) : trying to match a method signature of class ?signature?; expects a list or a character vector --

I've been having this problem ever since FC5 upgraded above .22 of smbclient: Domain=[IDC] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] smb: \> dir client_check_incoming_message: received message with mid 9 with no matching send record. SMB Signature verification failed on incoming packet! Server packet had invalid SMB signature! listing \* Error in dskattr: Server packet had invalid

HiI have a class which would like to hold a connection to ODBC data connection. The handle to the connection is something like (according to RODBC manual):channel = odbcConnect("DSN",uid="user",pwd="password")However, I would like to make a slot of my "foo" class to hold this object. For example:setClass("foo",

2006/1/27, Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com <Matthew.van.Eerde@hbinc.com>: > > I've successfully installed and configured NUT on my test machine and am > moving it into production. > > http://www.networkupstools.org/source.html offers some good advice... "You > should always use PGP/GPG to verify the signatures before using any source > code" > > But where

When winbind is started I get the following log messages: signing_good: BAD SIG: seq 1 SMB Signature verification failed on incoming packet! After extensive googling the only reference I find is that my kerberos might be too old. (using krb 1.2.4). Can someone confirm is this a bug in kerberos or a bug in samba. If the later is there a workaround or do I have to upgrade to new kerberos?

Author: wyllys Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: c300512c0d2609e729a85ce9f318a9133e7a8b1e Log message: 6217236 pcfs module has incorrect FAT signature check (fix lint) 6310335 mkfs_pcfs FAT size computation is wrong. (fix lint) Files: update: usr/src/cmd/fs.d/pcfs/mkfs/mkfs.c update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/pcfs/pc_vfsops.c

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>RalphLauren.com</TITLE> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16788" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=646 border=0>

Is there some way to create a target-specific C-ABI compatible function signature using LLVM? For example, this C-Code:     typedef struct vpt_data {         char x;         int a;         char c;         float b;     } vpt_data;         void vpt_test( vpt_data vd ) { Generates a function:     define void @vpt_test(i64 %vd.coerce0, i64 %vd.coerce1) #0 { And also packs/unpacks the structure

After compiling llvm and the cfrontend, I tried to run llvm2cpp on a few of the .ll files in the test/Regression directory. When I try this, I get the following error: llvm2cpp: Invalid bytecode signature: 5552203B (Vers=0,Pos=4) Any help would be appreciated. thanks, Todd

Thank you for the help. There seem to be several things in my makefiles that are messed up as a result of switching from the gcc3.4 front end to the gcc4 frontend. Is there any documentation listing the things that have changed? Thanks, Ryan Ryan M. Lefever [http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~lefever] On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:06

> Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions of > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same rev number to be safe. For llvm-gcc 2.3, you should use llvm 2.3. You can't use llvm-gcc 2.3 with llvm svn TOT for example. What version of llvm and llvm-gcc

I am not using svn and llvm version is 2.3 and llvm-gcc is 4.2.1 2008/7/3 Tanya M. Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>: > > > Some weeks ago i talked to someone at #LLVM and he told me that versions > of > > llvm and gcc aren't sycronized. But i don't know how to do this. > > If you are using svn, you should keep llvm and llvm-gcc both at the same > rev number