similar to: Feature Request: Authentication enhancement

This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. Razvan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanya Lattner" <tonic at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 7:40 AM

As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me. If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok. Else, I am afraid that this one is for now the

I tried to compile on Windows ( using the win32/llvm.sln in MSVC Express 2008 ) the new 2.3 branch and here are the results: 1. I needed to copy the file Configure.exe.embed.manifest to Configure.exe.intermediate.manifest . This is a bug from the previous llvm release (2.2) 2. I copied the file SimplifyLibCalls.cpp from lib/Transforms/Scalar to lib/Transforms/IPO. I think the position of

On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:04 AM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > <inline asm>:1:2: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit > suffix (could be 'btsw', 'btsl', or 'btsq') > bts $14,(%eax) This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a

On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: >> >> This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I don't recall if there was a resolution. >> > > Thanks for the link, completely missed

On Nov 20, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Ghitulete Razvan <razvan.ghitulete at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: >>> >>> This has come up before <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/vomnIQjefzA>. I

Razvan, You're somewhat misinterpreting the GPL license. Using binutils as a dependency of LLVM does not require that they be linked into any distributable that might contain proprietary code. They can be shipped as separate, purely-GPL'd executables that are called via the command line, thereby avoiding the whole "infection" problem. This is, for instance, how

I verified the patch and it compiles all the targets, both in Debug and Release modes. If there is no someone else to keep the MSVC projects files updated, I will try from time to time to update them and to add the new targets. Maybe a note must be put in "docs/GettingStartedVS.html" at the Requirements section that llvm needs now MSVC (Express) 2008 to compile. Razvan -----

> This is my patch for MSVC 2008 and it was applied by Chris: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080512/062390.html > > I tested it and it is ok for the 2.3 release. I don't believe I can apply this patch. There have been several patches applied recently to TOT to allow MSVC 2005 which I think many people are using. Does this patch mean that one

On May 19, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > I tested this pre-release on MSVC and I noted that none of the > submitted > patches (mine or others) were applied. > So the llvm 2.3 will not compile out of the box in MSVC? > Please provide me with a link to the patch(s) that need to be applied (llvm-commits archive email). I only apply patches that have been sent to me and

On May 13, 2008, at 10:04 PM, Razvan Aciu wrote: > Thanks for your replies. This is indeed a helpful mailing list. I > made some > more researches about the licensing issue and this is what I > discovered: > For now, I think for a commercial developer who wants to create a > complete > compiler toolchain using llvm, trying to package its compiler with > GCC is a

Dear R-users I have some doubts about with converting dates... e.g. dates data 23/12/1975 0.8678 03/01/1976 0.8736 28/01/1976 0.765 13/03/1976 0,9654 ... I think that converting these dates can easily my plots... is there a R function to convert these dates to a julian dates and so plot that variables?? The help files as.POSIXlt, POSIXt and others don't aswer my doubts...

Hi, I have been searching the mailing list, but i couldn't found the aswer for this one : How do i give root privilege for other users in swat, so that other users can create shares, and change other configs using swat ? Thanks in advance. Alexandre.

Hi, alhtough i googled for details concerning ASTCC i did not found an aswer to the following: Should i put in my extensions.conf the configuration of the astcc? I ask this because as i see it, in the end of the extensions.conf there is an include statement : #include /var/lib/astcc/astcc-exten.conf Should the config been done in the astcc-exten.conf file or the initial extensions.conf

Hello! I'm new in Asterisk and I hope that my trouble is very simple. We're implementing a Education Project of a e-Learning system (LMS) that uses conferencing (video and audio) over internet. The e-Learning system will be on GPL license, and for that, we're using only free software to implement. Asterisk is our first choice for video and audio conferencing, and making tests,

Hello, i have been looking over inet for an answer to a problem iam unable to resolve, and after not being able to find a solution, i hope to get an aswer in the list. I have been trying to reach my /home (Dom0) from one of my virtual machines (i''m runnning them in debian etch) and i''m unable to do it, what i''m trying to do is to catch a file from the /home of my Dom0,

Hi guys, I am trying to compile some files using clang + llvm and I am encountering the following error during the linking step: <inline asm>:1:2: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be 'btsw', 'btsl', or 'btsq') bts $14,(%eax) Which basically does not make any sense, because I don't have the mentioned inline assembly in any

Hi, I hate to stress you guys, i already posted a few messages about this but i am still confused about what's going on. Windows (here XP but i think others as well) is unable to see my list of shares when i have security=user! how come? how can i fix this? Thanks angain, Razvan Rotaru

Add the new MEM_EVENT_REASON_MSR event type. Works similarly to the other register events, except event.gla always contains the MSR address (in addition to event.gfn, which holds the value). MEM_EVENT_REASON_MSR does not honour the HVMPME_onchangeonly bit, as doing so would complicate the hvm_msr_write_intercept() switch-based handling of writes for different MSR addresses, with little added

I'm new to asterisk and fror a cupple of days I heave been googleing the net for digium "clones", because it's very hard for me to get a digium card (X100P). Does anyone Know another substitute for X100P (I know that intel based modem with chip 537/MD3200 is working but I did not find any of those) ? I made it work with an Intel 536 (with a costumised driver that I found on