similar to: link-dest

Just got this from our nightly backup rsync: overflow: flags=0x6e l1=99 l2=1952984691 lastname=var/www/manual/mod/mod_php4/de/function.get-exte ERROR: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(238) Command exited with non-zero status 22 real 5.15 user 1.00 sys 0.88 Rsync version information: [root@gluon root]# rsync

Steve Sills Platnum Computers, President http://www.platnum.com steve@platnum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sills" <steve@platnum.com> To: "jw schultz" <jw@pegasys.ws> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Rsync's Speed > The source server is a Dual 800 Mhz /w a 7200 RPM 40 GB HDD, the dest server > is a P III 450 with a

Just built 2.6.1 and started testing it. Nice job guys. I especially love the --progress and hardlink tweaks. Quite often, while I have systems backing up out of cron, I'd love to be able to see the --progress. Unfortunately, it's just not practical to crank up the verbosity like that on a regular basis (some of these systems have a few million files). A neat feature I'd like to see

rsync commandline: /usr/bin/rsync -e /usr/bin/ssh --archive --compress --sparse --verbose --stats --delete --numeric-ids --partial --relative --one-file-system target.host:/ /destination/path/ target rsync version: 2.6.3 destination rsync version: 2.6.2 The server we're trying to synchronize contains directories within "/" that are mounted to other locations within

I've been getting this error message for a few days from a customer's server and we can't seem to decipher it. I googled for it and only found references to it with respect to much older versions of rsync. We're running the Debian packaged version of rsync version 2.6.2-3. The customer side is running 2.6.3 compiled from source. #### inflate (token) returned -5 rsync error:

Have the hard-links optimizations that were described here been implemented? http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-January/008137.html In any case, what's the general consensus behind using the --hard-links option on large (100GB and above) images? Does it still use a ton of memory? Or has that situation been alleviated? ..Chuck.. -- http://www.quantumlinux.com Quantum Linux

I've never seen this one before. I'm using rsync 2.6.2 on both ends. Server (Athlon, 768MB RAM) checks out just fine. The only anomoly appears to be that this process has been running for 248268.43 seconds (this is not unexpected with this particular host we're backing up). Commandline: /usr/bin/time -p /usr/bin/rsync -e /usr/bin/ssh --archive --compress --sparse --stats

One of our servers is a CentOS 4 Linux/Samba filesharing server that serves an access database (via a mapped drive) to a client application running on Windows 98. Ever since we started rsync'ing it to back it up every night, it required samba to be restarted after the backup or the clients had trouble accessing the database. Recently though, the client application is complaining when

Hi all, I'm new to the rsync list. I've been searching for two days and have tried five different installs and so far none work the way I need them to. I have an "backup" server running rsync --version: rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29 Copyright (C) 1996-2005 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard

During my initial download for my home directory backup, it took rsync over 6 hours to do the initial backup, but I can FTP the stuff in about 30 Mins. Is Rsync usualy this slow? I have compression turned on, and its across a 100 MB/S network, Anyone had this problem before? Steve Sills

What I want to do is use rsync to back up a folder to an external drive. I would like to keep 30 days worth. For example: I have backups of June 1 - June 30. Once July 1 comes along, I want to keep June 2 - July 1 and delete June 1, and so forth. Any ideas how I can accomplish this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rysnc-Schedule-tf4104577.html#a11672997 Sent from the

# Environment (both local and remote hosts): $ /usr/bin/rsync --version rsync version 2.5.7 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, batchfiles, IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums $ uname -a Linux dbrac-01 2.4.9-e.27enterprise #1 SMP Tue

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2800 Summary: bwlimit effects checksum speed Product: rsync Version: 2.6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: schwern@pobox.com QAContact:

OK, I set up a new PC with a fresh XP load to be my rsync server. Rsync by itself seems to work fine (thank God. I'm going nuts.) I am still having problems when I throw ssh into the mix. At least now, things don't crash, but they do hang. The file list gets build, the transfer starts and it gets through maybe a few hundred files, but then everything stops. All the processes are still

I'm trying to rsync a smb filesystem to a novell netware filesystem. Both file systems are mounted on a debian woody system (from root). On both file systems the rsync process has "root" file system rights. But trying to rsync a file with a read only flag like -r-xr-xr-x 1 root root 3441648 Jan 20 1998 WEBCLIENT.EXE to the novell filesystem gives this error: rename

As you all know, rsync doesn't have any special handling for Mac OS X HFS+ resource forks. Kevin Boyd made RsyncX and rsync_hfs, to address this gap, but they only work when the destination filesystem is also HFS+. I haven't been able to find any references to an rsync that is capable of syncing from HFS+ to UFS (etc). The only solutions I've seen involve lots of preprocessing

Hi, I've installed cygwin and rsync on a vista client and want backup it to a Linux server: On client side (vista) I use rsync 3.0.4 (protocol version 30) Capabilities: 64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, no IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, ACLs, no xattrs, iconv, symtimes On server side (linux) I have rsync 3.0.3

Hi, In my backup script I have noticed nothing gets deleted on the remote end even though I have --delete and --delete-excluded. Did I miss anything obvious here? rsync -azC -e ssh --relative --one-file-system --sparse --numeric-ids --vP $IGNORE ## a long list of --exclude patterns --delete --delete-excluded --bwlimit=0 --backup --suffix=''

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Using the following settings: $ export RSYNC_PROXY=www-proxy:3125 $ rsync -av --stats --progress --partial --delete-after --bwlimit=160 rsync://carroll.cac.psu.edu/mandrakelinux/ /export/ftp/mandrakelinux I'll almost certainly get this error at some point during the transfer: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (320497666 bytes received so

All, Recently on an Ultra 10 running Solaris 8: -- SunOS toasty 5.8 Generic_108528-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10, -- using a pre-compiled package of rsync 2.5.6 from sunfreeware.com: -- bash-2.03$ rsync --version rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 Copyright (C) 1996-2002 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links,