similar to: No subject

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "No subject"

2010 Jul 16
4
--compare-dest weirdness
Hi All, I am writing a backup program for my computer. brief outline is as follows. Running ubuntu 10.04 2 main partitions, / and /home, both ext3. 1 external usb hdd, ext3, mounted to /backups/main. once every couple of days, rsync backs up, using following command, everything worth backing up in / and /home partitions to a folder /backups/main/Full. command: "rsync -vrhRupElog
2000 Apr 03
1
2.0.7pre3: smbclient issues
My systems: rh61, 2.2.14 + smbfs-nls.patch. I refer to 2.0.7pre3 as 2.0.7 === 1) "ls" of an empty dir 1a) 1.9.18 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls 49550 blocks of size 16384. 33754 blocks available 1b) 2.0.7 doing "ls" to an empty samba dir: smb: \> ls ERRDOS - ERRbadfile (File not found.) listing \* <=======
2010 May 05
2
[Bug 1767] New: Inconsistend wildcard expansion in 'ls *'
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1767 Summary: Inconsistend wildcard expansion in 'ls *' Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
2007 Jul 16
2
Source inside source
Is there a way to know where is the source, so as to make a source call inside another source smarter? As an example: file1.R is in directory /files/dir1/ file2.R is in directory /files/dir1/dir2/ In file1.R, there is this line: source("dir2/file2.R") So, if I setwd to /files/dir1/, and then I call source("file1.R"), it will run correctly. However, if I setwd to /files,
2012 Dec 03
4
How to calculate the spatial correlation of several files?
dir1 <- list.files("C:\\Users\\aalyaari\\Desktop\\cor", "*.bin", full.names = TRUE) dir2 <- list.files("C:\\Users\\aalyaari\\Desktop\\cor2", "*.bin", full.names = TRUE) results <- list() for (.files in dir1){ # read in the 365 files as a vector of numbers for dir1 file1 <- do.call(rbind,(lapply(.files, readBin ,
2004 Mar 25
1
Per-directory .cvsignore too aggressive
I have noticed that the contents of per-directory .cvsignore files apply outside their subtrees when using --cvs-exclude in rsync 2.6.0. In the results below, notice how dir1/.cvsignore is applying to a file in dir2. There is no ~/.cvsignore, and the CVSIGNORE variable is unset. % ls -AFR .: dir1/ dir2/ ./dir1: .cvsignore file1 ./dir2: file2.foo % cat dir1/.cvsignore *.foo % /usr/bin/rsync
2003 Feb 25
2
Difference in behaviour with --backup
When I do rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/dir3 machine:/dir1/dir2/dir3 I get /dir1/dir2/Backup/dir3/... /Backup/dir3/dir4/... i.e. the tree under 'dir3' (my source tree) gets created under .../Backup. This is fine. But when I do the same thing with a single file like rsync -av --backup --backup-dir=/dir1/dir2/Backup \ /dir1/dir2/file
2003 Nov 25
1
rsync-bugs and unclear semantics when copying multiple source-dirs to one target
On 24 Nov 2003, Dirk Pape <pape@inf.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Dear Martin Pool, > > I tried to ask via the rsync-mailing list but never got an answer. So I > contact you directly. > > I refer to the rsync syntax > > rsync [OPTION]... SRC [SRC]... DEST > > with more than one SRC, which is mentioned in the man-pages. > We use this form to "overlay"
2018 May 17
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hi mabi, Some questions: -Did you by any chance change the cluster.quorum-type option from the default values? -Is filename.shareKey supposed to be any empty file? Looks like the file was fallocated with the keep-size option but never written to. (On the 2 data bricks, stat output shows Size =0, but non zero Blocks and yet a 'regular empty file'). -Do you have some sort of a
2007 Dec 09
3
OT: Rsync question
Hello All, I have an off topic question about rsync and was wondering if i can get some kind person help with it. I have two servers with each server have three same directories on them /dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/ . How would i achieve this by using rsync? I have tried rsync -avrt --delete server_ip:/dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/ /dir1/ /dir2/ /dir3/ this does not do anything except give errors. Someone on IRC
2018 May 15
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Thank you Ravi for your fast answer. As requested you will find below the "stat" and "getfattr" of one of the files and its parent directory from all three nodes of my cluster. NODE 1: File: ?/data/myvolume-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/filename.shareKey? Size: 0 Blocks: 38 IO Block: 131072 regular
2018 May 23
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hello, I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do? For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread? Thanks, Mabi ? ??????? Original Message ??????? On May 17, 2018 11:07 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > ?? > > Hi Ravi,
2018 May 23
1
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 05/23/2018 12:47 PM, mabi wrote: > Hello, > > I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do? > > For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread? Sorry Mabi,? I haven't had a chance to dig deeper into this. The workaround of
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 04/09/2018 05:40 PM, mabi wrote: > Again thanks that worked and I have now no more unsynched files. > > You mentioned that this bug has been fixed in 3.13, would it be possible to backport it to 3.12? I am asking because 3.13 is not a long-term release and as such I would not like to have to upgrade to 3.13. I don't think there will be another 3.12 release. Adding Karthik to see
2002 Jul 14
0
Samba question - File or
Hello all; I'm attempting to migrate from an existing NT4 file server to a Debian GNU / Samba setup. I've performed this many times before with great success, however this particular case in proving to be something of a problem. On the test setup, all seems to be working fine apart from one particular application. The application in question reports only "Run-time error
2005 Dec 20
4
rsync deleting symbolic link unexpectedly
I''m running 2.6.6 on a red hat EL3 system. using the following command, rsync -rlptDvzL --stats --include=a/ --include=a/dir/ --include=a/dir/symlink/ --include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/ --include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/dir3/ --exclude=''**'' /export/stuff remote::stuff I expect the "symlink" (which is really a symbolic link to a directory) to be preserved on the
2012 May 28
1
Why R order files as 1 10 100 not 1 2 3 ?
The code given below worked well. However, the problem is that when I typed dir1 to see the results I found that R order the files as: [1] "data1.flt" "data10.flt" "data100.flt" "data101.flt" [5] "data102.flt" "data103.flt" "data104.flt" "data105.flt" [9] "data106.flt" "data107.flt"
2008 Jun 12
0
Samba 3 handles Linux permissions differently then Samba 2 ?
Hi, we have a problem with permissions migrating from a custom 2.4 kernel Linux distro with Samba 2.2.5 to OpenSuSE 10.3 (with samba 3.0.26). We used to have directories like this (relative to the Samba share): /root/dir0/dir1/dir2/dir3/userdir1-1/userdir1-2 'root' and all it's parent directories have '0755' Linux permission. dir0-dir3 all have '0711' permissions
2001 Nov 16
1
include/exclude directory question
I want to send a subset of directories sepcified in "include" arguments to a client, but I am creating all the peer and parent directories as well, although they are empty - here is basically what I'm doing. assuming I have /staging/upgrade/dir1, /staging/upgrade/dir2 and /staging/upgrade/dir3 on the source tree. --include "*/" -include upgrade/dir1/** -include
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 04/09/2018 05:09 PM, mabi wrote: > Thanks Ravi for your answer. > > Stupid question but how do I delete the trusted.afr xattrs on this brick? > > And when you say "this brick", do you mean the brick on the arbitrer node (node 3 in my case)? Sorry I should have been clearer. Yes the brick on the 3rd node. `setfattr -x trusted.afr.myvol-private-client-0