similar to: No subject

I have been trying for quite a while now to understand why is the flist.c:f_name() function implemented using static buffers. Anyone care to comment? The immediate problem is that any call to f_name overrides the previous content (well, obvious). This, combined with the fact that several function calls are made with the result of f_name(file) results in problems handling hardlinks - and

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Dear Sir or Madam, Has anyone seen a error message like the following? rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: Too many links (31) rsync: stat "/home/kmiller/briefcase/1205275" failed: No such file or directory (2) As far as I can tell, I am not using any symlinks or hardlinks. Please find below a reasonably complete bug report. Please let

I'm running a mirror of several repositories that are fetched using separate rsync runs. Since some of those repositories are hosting related files, I'm using the hardlink utility[1] in order to save disk space. However, I've noticed an issue that may lead to potential file metadata inconsistencies when using hardlink. Consider the following scenario: - two repositories (rep_a and

Hi, I've build rsync-3.0.6 on a number of legacy unix systems, and on a few systems the regression tests showed up with some errors: HP-UX 11.11 and 11.23 (ia64): FAIL chown FAIL dir-sgid FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize IRIX 6.5.13m: FAIL chown FAIL fuzzy FAIL itemize MacOS-X 10.4: FAIL chgrp the errors on "fuzzy" and "itemize" are

Hi, I detected a silly behaviour of rsync when new hardlinks of already synced files are created: Scenario: There are a local directory and a equal remote directory created by former run of rsync. Create a hardlink from a already existing file (both inside the local directory). If this hardlink has a filename with comes before the original filename when both are sorted in alphabetic order,

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws> wrote: > OK, first pass on TODO complete. .... > PERFORMANCE ---------------------------------------------------------- .... > Traverse just one directory at a time > > Traverse just one directory at a time. Tridge says it's possible. > > At the moment rsync reads the whole file list into memory at the >

I think your product is awesome, but I am experiencing an unexpected behaviour. $ rsync -avviPH /Users/alan/Desktop/rsync_test\ Folder/ root@slug::Downloads opening tcp connection to slug port 873 sending daemon args: --server -vvlHogDtpre30.16i "--log-format=%i" -- partial . Downloads sending incremental file list .d..t..g... ./ rsync: failed to write xattr user.rsync.%stat for

Hi, I'm trying to get rsync over OpenSSH/Cygwin working. I started with a command like this (which fails): $ rsync -v -v -v --recursive --rsh="ssh -i /home/ul081b/mpdm-keys/rsa-mpdm01 mpdm@mpdm-w2k3" MPDM-W2K3::MPDM . opening connection using ssh -i /home/ul081b/mpdm-keys/rsa-mpdm01 mpdm@mpdm-w2k3 MPDM-W2K3 rsync --server --daemon . bash: line 1: MPDM-W2K3: command not found

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8979 Summary: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: simon.klinkert at

Hi all, I have some updates on the hard-link discussion. First, let me explain that I installed a test machine with CentOS 7.1 and dovecot/pigeonhole version 2.2.10-4 and the results where identical on what I had on CentOS 6.7 and dovecot 2.0.9-19 The bottom line is that hardlinking works only when no, or at most only one, RCPT have sieve filtering. For example: - if no RCPT has sieve

Hi! It's me again with another --link-dest issue: I am using dirvish (www.dirvish.org) to create daily backup on disk images. dirvish is using rsync with --link-dest pointing to the last good image. This creates images with hardlinks to unmodified files. So far so good. Now I want to create a "current" filetree with hardlinks pointing to the last image. rsync -vaH --delete

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws> wrote: > OK, first pass on TODO complete. .... This hardlink bug report is nearly 21 months old... So I took a look at it using 2.5.7. See below. > BUGS --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Fix hardlink reporting 2002/03/25 > (was: There seems

This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 2) * This revision is actually against CVS HEAD (I didn't realize I was working from a stale rsync'd CVS). * Apply permissions after

Hi list, I have a little script that uses rysnc and hardlink to perform backups. Some days ago a friend told me that rsync could crash if the hardlink limit is reached. I know (and tested) that for ext4 the max number of hardlink for a single file is 65000 but I can't get a limit on XFS. Due to the fact that I can't get good resources from google search, I tried to reach its limit

Hi all, any ideas? Especially point n.1 (no hardlink when sending the same email to multiple addresses) confuse me a bit. Searching in old messages I even stumbled on some users stating that, using Dovecot LMTP server, they achieved what I want (one messagge, multiple hardlinks), but I am _already_ using LMTP with no avail... Regards. On 27/06/15 18:18, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Hi all,

Reposting this with a subject line :-) Hi, I'm trying to get rsync over OpenSSH/Cygwin working. I started with a command like this (which fails): $ rsync -v -v -v --recursive --rsh="ssh -i /home/ul081b/mpdm-keys/rsa-mpdm01mpdm@mpdm-w2k3" MPDM-W2K3::MPDM . opening connection using ssh -i /home/ul081b/mpdm-keys/rsa-mpdm01 mpdm@mpdm-w2k3 MPDM-W2K3 rsync --server --daemon . bash:

While installing rsync on a new Sun Netra running Solaris 2.8, two tests (chgrp and hardlinks) failed. I found that these tests execute rsync while other successfull tests exectute $RSYNC. It is fortunate that my shell path was quite restricted and that no earlier version of rsync was installed on my path. The system would have run the chgrp and hardlinks tests with an earlier rsync if it had

Hi list, many moons ago I asked about preserving hardlink between identical messages when pigeonhole (for sieve filtering) was used. The reply was that, while hardlink worked well for non-filtered messages, using pigeonhole broke the hardlink (ie: some message-specific data was appended to the actual mail file). Here you can find the original thread:

I can't seem to get the hardlinks to work in windows via --link-dest. It just refuses to find the files in the directory and make a hard link. Here's the setup. -I run 2 rsyncs from batch files called sync.bat and sync2.bat. -I'm connected to the server via a mapped network drive, we'll call it 'z'. -I then run the client, on the destination, once to pull the data