similar to: Adding support for versioned files in rsync

I've pondered the feedback and revised my proposal to the client. Here is the revised project objectives. Notably, this is the addition of 4), the deletion of the whole slew of items actually related to handling versioned files, and mention of preexisting work on 1). I've took a little gander at some of the backup wrappers, and it looks like I will probably use one of these. I'll

I now fully and completely remember why I hate Windows. I have struggled with the backup semantics options in order to get rsync able to back up open files, and I got something that appeared like it should work, but it didn't work. So I finally broke down and wrote a holdopen.exe and a tryopen.exe to test my theory, and no matter what privleges were enabled (backup and restore were enabled),

What is the point to checksum_seed? When reading/writing batch, it is initialized to a constant value, otherwise it is initialized to time(NULL). It certainly has no useful cryptographic value :) I got the go-ahead from the client on my --link-by-hash proposal, and the seed is making the hash unstable. I can't figure out why the seed is there so I don't know whether to cirumvent it in

hi guyz, One simple question. What does rsync do when it encounters open files. Do we have to use open file manager(like st bernard) to back up open files or is there any open source open file manager or can rsync backup open files by itself. thanx tarun --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.

This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. Anyone have an example of an MD4 collision so I can test that case? :) Patch Summary: -1 +1 Makefile.in -0 +304 hashlink.c (new)

Hi!!!! I''ve tried ROR! it''s fantastic!!! wonderful!!! I WANT LEARN ALL ABOUT IT!!! Do you have some links ( if exists in italian language ), or suggest me some book i can buy?? thx very much -- /\/\ariano Di Felice Java PHP Python programmer with MySQL, PostgreSql, SQLite and Oracle support Linux Platform Developer mariano.difelice@gmail.com Tel. 0735 703735 Cell +39 339

This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 2) * This revision is actually against CVS HEAD (I didn't realize I was working from a stale rsync'd CVS). * Apply permissions after

Howdy. I''m trying to work with a legacy SQL Server database where some of the table names have spaces in them. I''ve done set_table_name "tablename with spaces", but I can''t get find(:all) to work. I get the following error (because apparently it''s not putting [ ] around the name as is required for SQL Server for names with spaces.

I''ve have a very tight schedule project that MUST (not my option), be developed in PHP. Is there a Rails based framework for this platform? I like the Rails way of things, but in this case, I cannot choose the programming language, so please don''t offend me :-) Thanks in advance, Alessandro _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list

All callers of robust_rename() call copy_file() if EXDEV is received. This patch moves the copy_file() call into robust_rename(). Patch Summary: -12 +1 backup.c -15 +2 rsync.c -9 +33 util.c -------------- next part -------------- patchwork diff util.c --- util.c 2004-02-17 09:58:44.000000000 -0500 +++ util.c 2004-02-17 10:21:22.000000000 -0500 @@ -355,16 +355,40 @@

I seem to have an rsync versioning problem. The sender is an old ClearOS6 server with rsynv 3.0.6 The receiver is a brand new Centos7-armv7 server with rsync 3.1.2 I am running rsync over ssh Got the error: rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(600) [sender=3.0.6] And researching this it comes down to a versioning issue.? But all I have found was to upgrade the

I am using Rsync to backup 4 Linux/Samba servers to a Netware 6.5 server over a VPN. Also using cyRsync to backup XP computers to the same Netware 6.5 server ovre a LAN. Rsync is run from a cron job on the Linux servers and the actual process works fine. However, I have found that when I rsync to the Netware Server from either Linux/Samba or Xp, the file Date Modified is changed to something like

This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 4) * Updated for committed robust_rename() patch, other changes in CVS. (rev 3) * Don't link empty files. * Roll over to new file when

This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 3) * Don't link empty files. * Roll over to new file when filesystem maximum link count is reached. * If link fails for another reason, leave

This patch adds the --link-by-hash=DIR option, which hard links received files in a link farm arranged by MD4 file hash. The result is that the system will only store one copy of the unique contents of each file, regardless of the file's name. (rev 5) * Fixed silly logic error. (rev 4) * Updated for committed robust_rename() patch, other changes in CVS. (rev 3) * Don't link empty

I am running RedHat 6.2 on many of my servers and am receiving the following errors when compiling Rsync 2.5.2: [root@wrapguy rsync-2.5.2]# make gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c rsync.c -o rsync.o In file included from rsync.c:23: rsync.h:339: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union rsync.h:339: parse error before `inode' rsync.h:341: parse error before `dev'

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8993 If you''ve got feedback, requests for coverage, etc. please let me know. I''ll try to respond in an upcoming column. -- thanks, -pate ------------------------- http://on-ruby.blogspot.com

Hi all, I recently came across a possible requirement of backing up certain files on a remote server ... in an encrypted format. This got me seriously thinking about the possibility of doing such a thing with rsync. I am not too knowledgable about encryption and the mechanisms of the rsync algorithm (at least as yet :), but I would like to know whether this is attainable or 'far fetched'

I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship, remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites), Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written, could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's response for the state of rsync,

On 08/03/2018 11:07 AM, Warren Young wrote: > On Aug 3, 2018, at 8:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> I seem to have an rsync versioning problem. > Have you ruled out the other causes of that error? For instance: > > https://askubuntu.com/a/716911 yeah.? It is backups, not backup.? Oops. > >> And researching this it comes down to a