similar to: rsync's "value to large" error.

HI, I'm currently using rsync version 2.4.4 protocol version 24 on a HP11.0, Solaris 8 and Redhat 7.1 platforms. In my earlier posting, I asked about the problem on "Value too large to be stored in data type" when transferring files which are >= 2GB in size., i.e. building file list ... global/FCSI/WP_RLS05/rundir/wp_celtic_max_fullwarn.tcl.log: Value too large to be stored in

HI, I have a scenario where a filesystem i.e /fs13/m6.uecommon.1/wmt8/utils is residing on a fileserver i.e. fs13. Contents of this filesystem are as follows: # ls -l /fs13/m6.uecommon.1/wmt8/utils lrwxrwxrwx ........ include-> /fs12/m6.uecommon.1/utils/include lrwxrwxrwx ........ tool_utils-> /fs12/m6.uecommon.1/utils/tool_utils The filesystems being pointed to i.e

We've just released the project code for public review. You can find the diffs at the following links: CSI LLVM pass: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21445 CSI Clang support: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21446 CSI Runtime and tests: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21447 The RST for the CSI project can be found with the Clang diff. We know that this code requires changes, additions, more tests, cleanup, etc.

I am very glad this project reached the state where we can start the public code review. Please shoot the patches for review when ready. --kcc On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:14 PM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > CC'ing the mailing list for the CSI project. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:01 PM, TB Schardl <neboat at mit.edu> wrote: >

Hey David, Thank you for your feedback. I'm trying to understand the model you sketched in order to compare it to CSI's current approach, but the details of your proposal are still fuzzy to me. In particular, although the model you described would avoid using LTO to elide unused hooks, it seems more complicated for both tool writers and tool users to use. Please clarify your model and

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 295352 logcheck-database Bug#295352: logcheck doesn't ignore rsync's log "rsync on modulename-with-hyphen from host (ip)" Bug reassigned from package `rsync' to `logcheck-database'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Hi, I vaguely remember some talk on this list of a virtual file system of some sort for rsync. The goal was to handle cases where the file system on the original side carried information (permissions, ownership, special file types?) which couldn't be recorded directly on the receiving side. I think the proposal was to record as much of this information as possible in the receiving

Hi, I'm writing a program to use rsync to do something, and I want to keep the output of both in the same log file. My program is writing log to /var/log/my.log via syslog() LOG_LOCAL0. I tried to use rsync's '--log-file=/var/log/my.log' option; it seems to work to some extent, but have some problems: 1. If I issue the rsync command directly on command line, rsync's log will

I am trying to understand how rsync uses ssh. From what I understand of the source, it simply opens a ssh connection and then simply pipes rsync's data. But somehow my stomach tells me that this is not the whole story. For one, that would mean the whole (?) of rsync's protocol is only used for not-ssh transmission. The biggest question for me right now is, whether rsync, when transmitting

Steve Sills Platnum Computers, President http://www.platnum.com steve@platnum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sills" <steve@platnum.com> To: "jw schultz" <jw@pegasys.ws> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Rsync's Speed > The source server is a Dual 800 Mhz /w a 7200 RPM 40 GB HDD, the dest server > is a P III 450 with a

Hello, I am working on a backup script using rsync and have a question. Rather than doing a single rsync of /home/ I have set my script up to loop over /etc/passwd and do a seperate rsync of each user home dir (/home/user1, /home/user2) etc. In the end, I should have the exact same backup either way. However I feel safest doing it as multiple rsyncs (one for each user). I am doing this

Hi, Is there a way in which rsync's -z compression (zlib) utility can be benchmarked? I'm trying to compare the compression ratio between rsync and external compression tools like gzip and bzip2. Are there any advantages to using rsync's internal compression mechanism specified with the -z option compared to solely applying external compression i.e. bzip2 to the files and invoking

During my initial download for my home directory backup, it took rsync over 6 hours to do the initial backup, but I can FTP the stuff in about 30 Mins. Is Rsync usualy this slow? I have compression turned on, and its across a 100 MB/S network, Anyone had this problem before? Steve Sills

I apologize if this has already been discussed before, but as of yet I have been unable to find any info on the topic. I have a very simple (and common) disk based backup system using rsync, hard links, and a little bit of perl to glue it together. Remote machines are backed up regularly using hardlinks across each snapshot to reduce disk usage. Recently I learned that rsync does a