similar to: need assistance with rsync keeping two live servers synced.

I did testing on generating this report from a 130 MB Quickbooks file. Locally, 15 seconds. Samba Server, 1:35. Shared off of my win98 Workstation, 2+ mins. I do not understand the reason it is SOO slow. I know it is a fairly large file. The only explanation I can come up with is the way QuickBooks is accessing the files. Maybe jumping all around the file, requiring many operations on the

From what I've read on the list, there does not appear to be POSIX ACL support for rsync at this time, is this true? There does however appear to be a patch floating around out there, where can I find this patch. TIA -Justin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: This is a

I want to build 2 servers (both running samba) to provide file storage to 2 offices (approx 100 miles apart, linked via DSL) but all data writen to 1 server must also be saved to the other server. Both servers would also allow users to access the data via a VPN thus allowing 1 office with a failed server to access the other server via the vpn and still see the data from both offices. I currently

I haven't seen anything about this here and thought I should pass it along. christopher neitzert <chris at neitzert.com> made two postings to the full-disclosure list earlier today. They stated, in part: ***** Does anyone know of or have source related to a new, and unpublished ssh exploit? An ISP I work with has filtered all SSH connections due to several root level incidents

Hi Guys, I have run into a very interesting problem using GPO's on our DC's. As you may (or may not) know, we have migrated to a pure Samba4 (Git stable branch checkout) AD network. I can't be happier. *Kudos to the Samba team* We are running to DC's, DC1 and DC2, both full fledged DC's, both running CentOS 6.9, fully up to date. For the sysvol partition I decided to run a

I have a Cisco VPN Concentrator 3000, It has the ability to auth PPTP tunnels off of a WinNT Domain controler. Well, I to use my samba3 box instead of a WinNT box. I have samba3 running off of an LDAP back end. Anyway, I setup the VPN Concentrator to auth off of the samba box, and when I test it with the test option, and it works, but when I try to auth a pptp tunnel, it fails saying the

On 22 November 2017 at 17:45, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:01:17 +0200 > Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > I have run into a very interesting problem using GPO's on our DC's. > > > > As you may (or may not) know, we have migrated to a pure Samba4 (Git >

Perhaps stupid question but, is Asterisk a statefull or stateless proxy? Ignace

Hi When I register a SIP or IAX client to asterisk and I dial to it from another UA then there is no problem at all But, when I register two or more clients to the SAME peer (with the same user/pass) and I call to this peer.. Then only the UA which registered the last will ring.. Others don't ring... What can I do about this?? I would like to register for example 10 UA's to the same

I am planning to replace our cisco 7200 core router with Linux. We currently serve around 1500 (3/4 DSL - different router) customers with probably half of them being concurrent at any given time. We have a fiber network and customers currently aren''t managed as far as how much bandwidth they can use at anytime. Therefore I have constructed a working tc qdisc Linux router as a test. It

Hai, Small update since i need som testers.. im trying to setup bi-directional sysvol replication. Unison has this ability. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ This is beta, so if you have successed, please report this back. DONT TEST THIS ON YOUR PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT. Thanks ! Louis

On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being used for this replication anymore. As the instructions there actually use "Osync" then the word "UNISON" should probably need to be replaced with "OSYNC". (I looked

On 23 November 2017 at 14:16, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:01:03 +0200 > Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 22 November 2017 at 17:45, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:01:17 +0200 > > > Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at

Hi, I just read the thread http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-June/009678.html which describes how --keep-dirlinks came to be. My use case is similar, but I?d like a similar option for files as well. Setup: in my public_html I have some symlinks which I send over as files, with -L (for various reasons: partly, because they are copies of current work which is done elsewhere, or

On 2016-08-26 10:59, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 06:08:16 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On the "Bidirectional Rsync/Unison based SysVol replication >> workaround" page. The title (as you can see) includes the word UNISON >> when in fact the "Unison" program is NOT being

Hi I use /usr/bin/rsync -XAavz --log-file /var/log/sysvol-sync.log --delete-after -f"+ */" -f"- *" /var/lib/samba/sysvol root at DC2:/var/lib/samba && /usr/bin/unison &> /dev/null and works ok but not working with crontab */5 * * * * root /usr/bin/rsync -XAavz --log-file /var/log/sysvol-sync.log --delete-after -f"+ */" -f"- *"

Hi ! I am running rsync between two server machines where files are being created and removed from both machines simultaneously and I am facing the following problem : When a new file is created on machine 1 it is transferred to machine 2 without any problem, the same happens if a file is deleted from machine 1. But if a new file is created on machine 2, it is deleted from that machine before

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2094 matt at mattmccutchen.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |baya at rodovid.org ------- Comment #2 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2010-07-12 15:02 CST ------- *** Bug 7565 has been marked

> OK, make sure that the two idmap.ldb files match and then run > 'samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset' on both machines and see if this cured > this problem. I did: root at dc1:~$ service sernet-samba-ad stop root at dc2:~$ service sernet-samba-ad stop root at dc2:~$ mv /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb /root/idmap.ldb.bak root at dc1:~$ scp /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb

Hi Rowland, Am 26.08.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > OK, I have done what whoever changed the wiki page should have done, I > have created a new wiki page for the osync way and rolled the original > page back to the unison way of doing things. > > I will also discuss the unison page with Louis Van Belle, I believe he > is still using this method and may have