similar to: rsync/popt/config.log in CVS - presumably an accidental "cvs add"

Perhaps now is a good time to commit this patch which updates the included popt to version 1.7. This has been tested on FreeBSD and Solaris. http://www.catnook.com/patches/rsync-popt-1.7.diff Comments? -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/

This patch updates the files under popt/ to the latest vendor drop. The only change is the inclusion of a FreeBSD-specific patch to popt.c. This is needed in case somebody decides to build rsync on that platform without using the port. I'm not happy about the wording in popt/README.rsync so I may change it. The patch is available at http://www.catnook.com/rsync-popt-1.5.1.patch Comments

http://www.catnook.com/patches/rsync-popt-1.6.4.patch has a patch which upgrades the popt included with rsync to the latest version, 1.6.4. The configure script had to be regenerated (with autoconf 2.53) because popt.c wants HAVE_FLOAT_H. As an aside, I have heard people complain about this version of autoconf generating scripts that break when run under bash (as /bin/sh). Comments? -- Jos

Hello list, This is a patch to rsync 2.5.5, and it serves two purposes. The small patches to batch.c, flist.c and log.c simply add "void" to some function definitions so that all declarations in proto.h have full parameter lists. unsigned char read_batch_flags() OLD unsigned char read_batch_flags(void) NEW The SCO UNIXWare compiler correctly objected to these functions not having a

The second rsync-2.5.6 pre-release version is now available at: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.5.6pre2.tar.gz There's also a corresponding '.sig' file that contains a gpg signature of the file; the public key is available on the

Hi all; I am sure this question has been brought up before, but I could not find any information in the FAQ or docs etc. Quick question; Is there a way of syncing multiple servers simultaneously from 1 source server? Thanks, -- Vaibhav Goel extension 6347

--On Monday, May 14, 2007 9:16 PM -0700 Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> wrote: > ObPuppet: we ramping up our deployment this week to around 200 hosts. So > far everything has been going smoothly. We don''t have nearly as many and yet, we see occasional errors ("End of file reached") which seems to indicate the network cutting out. I can''t imagine what would

Hi, I am trying to compile rsync 2.5.5 on a Tru64 box. I downloaded configure.in revision 1.148, which I believe is the correct fix for the getaddrinfo problem; however I still have errors compiling rsync. Also I had to change line 22 in options.c from #include "popt.h" to #include "popt/popt.h". Any suggestions or ideas? Tan Dang

Hi all, I'm interesting in using -F and -f options to generate delta files to transfer to other computers not connected by network. I'm using cygwin whit rsync version 2.5.5 protocol 26, but even if those options are explaned, I can't use them. So I downloaded source for rsync+ but I'm not able to compile it because I have this error messages. $ make all gcc -I. -I. -g -O2

Hi all, I am using the following rsync command. rsync --write-batch -av --stats `cat $1` -e ssh user@host:/dirPath/ This is what is happening. 1. I have a list of , say 10 files. 2. On first attempt, all files are successfully rsynced. 3. When, I repeat the same command again, the files are MISSING on the destination machine. 4. From the log, it looks like the files are NOT being

I realize batch mode is still experimental, but I was hoping there might be a workaround for a problem I am getting. I have been trying to run some tests and I get the below error when I use the --read-batch option to. I can successfully create an initial set of batch files, then a second set based upon a few modified test files from the first batch. When I first run the --read-batch option

Hi, I was wondering if there is any of getting the gem package provider to run non-interactively? When upgrading mongrel it fails because it gets prompted for which version to install: Attempting remote update of mongrel Select which gem to install for your platform (x86_64-linux) 1. mongrel 1.1.1 (ruby) 2. mongrel 1.1.1 (jruby) 3. mongrel 1.1.1 (mswin32) 4. mongrel 1.1 (mswin32) 5.

Quick and dirty: --- lib/facter.rb (revision 203) +++ lib/facter.rb (working copy) @@ -989,6 +989,18 @@ %x{/usr/sbin/scutil --get LocalHostName} end end + Facter.add(:interfaces) do + confine :kernel => :linux + setcode do + %x{/sbin/ifconfig -a -s}.split($/)[1..-1].collect {|line|

For anyone that has experienced the odd End of file or Cannot describe errors, we''ve found that switching to Mongrel has fixed this problem for us. We''re currently running 5 instance of puppetmaster under mongrel (with the apache proxy in front) and things are going great. For more information on setting up Mongrel, visit:

While installing rsync on a new Sun Netra running Solaris 2.8, two tests (chgrp and hardlinks) failed. I found that these tests execute rsync while other successfull tests exectute $RSYNC. It is fortunate that my shell path was quite restricted and that no earlier version of rsync was installed on my path. The system would have run the chgrp and hardlinks tests with an earlier rsync if it had

I have a rsync server set up on a win2k server and a win xp pro computer is my client. It's working very well doing the anonymous transfers. However, I've tried setting up a password file and not having any success. rsyncd.conf on my server: use chroot = false strict modes = false hosts allow = * [serverbu] auth users = user path = c:/serverbu read only = no list = no secrets file =

And lsof the agent too - see what files it has open... Nico -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Steves [mailto:kevin at atomicgears.com] > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2002 4:48 PM > To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Cc: stevesk at pobox.com > Subject: Re: 3.4p1 ssh-agent auth-retry patch available: was: Re: > Updated ssh-agent authentication retry patch available

Hi, I have an application which is dying horrible deaths (i.e. segmentation faults) in mid-flight, in production... And of course, I should fix it. But while I find and fix the bugs, I found something I think should be different - I can work on submitting a patch, as it is quite simple, but I might be losing something on my rationale. When Mongrel segfaults, it does not -obviously- get to clean

Is there a way to specify on a per-object basis that Puppet should merely report that an object needs to be updated without actually performing the update? This would make it possible to detect changes to critical objects (e.g. config files) that Puppet shouldn''t try to fix automaticaly. -- Jos Backus jos at catnook.com

Just curious as to the functionality of puppet. Does Puppet ensure that a service is up and running as long as puppet is running? Ie, I want to make sure ssh is always running, if for some reason ssh get''s shut down, does puppet start it back up when it does it''s config sync run? Thanks! --------------------------------- Pinpoint customers who are looking for